ShiroukenJoin Date: 2016-05-03
Post Count: 655 |
I've seen people lagswitch before without the shotgunning
|
|
bryceeb9Join Date: 2009-04-19
Post Count: 2861 |
did anyone forget they played a global banned player
or that dalt admitted to LSing in that match too
|
|
Dalt2306Join Date: 2011-09-14
Post Count: 8513 |
it had affect on lowering our members health to yellow/orange/red regardless you shouldn't be cheating in a scrimmage so it will be voided and not counted as a win
|
|
BanvaxJoin Date: 2012-06-26
Post Count: 2722 |
go ahead and gb just because you guys are butthurt swines over a virtual match
it's an obvious match I was just providing proof
"it doesnt matter" do you not comprehend the point a LS is a LS?
come on now put your 2 brain cells together
edgier than the average edge |
|
Dalt2306Join Date: 2011-09-14
Post Count: 8513 |
i never lsed in that match but ok
|
|
MohxyJoin Date: 2010-12-20
Post Count: 5958 |
"It's funny that purge left halfway through the match"
To lag switch, you're basically just disconnecting your internet. When you disconnect your internet, you don't actually disconnect from the actual place until you have lost connection for more than 10 seconds or so. Purg most likely "disconnected" from the place because as he was trying to lag switch in order to damage the opposing team unfairly, he left his internet disconnected for over 10 seconds. This happens many times to inexperienced lag switchers who don't time it correctly.
It's obvious this is a lag switching because he's behind cover then after a few seconds, he's dealing 40 damage. Don't say this he is "lagging" because he was not. Even if he was "lagging", he shouldn't be playing if he's dealing damage behind cover, that's unfair and cheap.
I should also mention, during the SF v VAK negotiation time, fehq a.k.a purgeroni was caught lag switching at SMO. This led to his exile by paul321321 so you could ask him yourself that purgeroni lag switches. I could pull up the video as well.
|
|
bryceeb9Join Date: 2009-04-19
Post Count: 2861 |
|
|
bryceeb9Join Date: 2009-04-19
Post Count: 2861 |
Gard is GB'ed and isn't supposed to play in any RCL scrimmages, it's the reason he's GB'ed.
So TECHNICALLY the match can be voided as a win for my team.
|
|
|
So TECHNICALLY the match can be voided as a win for my team.
i dont think you understand what the word voided means |
|
Dalt2306Join Date: 2011-09-14
Post Count: 8513 |
Gard is GB'ed and isn't supposed to play in any RCL scrimmages, it's the reason he's GB'ed.
So TECHNICALLY the match can be voided as a win for my team.
you didn't even bother to provoke from gard playing seriously lol you're pathetic you've played with global banned players and didn't provoke them lol?
contradict yourself please
|
|
bryceeb9Join Date: 2009-04-19
Post Count: 2861 |
yeah i used the wrong word there i apologize.
but yeah you played a GB'ed player congrats and still lost nice
|
|
Dalt2306Join Date: 2011-09-14
Post Count: 8513 |
remember the match is voided now
|
|
BanvaxJoin Date: 2012-06-26
Post Count: 2722 |
it's an obvious lagswitch bryce and we gave even more proof please just stop
edgier than the average edge |
|
bryceeb9Join Date: 2009-04-19
Post Count: 2861 |
The only player I've ever played with that was GB'ed were onzurk and gard because I used to be in JCPO. I've complained several times about them playing in scrimmages, yet they both continue to do it anyways.
People get GB'ed for a REASON, they shouldn't be allowed in any matches. We shouldn't have to complain and ask for Gard1 to not play, it should be obvious, that's why they are >GB'ed<.
Not hard to understand at all.
|
|
|
AdvausoJoin Date: 2010-03-17
Post Count: 4021 |
jesus you guys
|
|
bryceeb9Join Date: 2009-04-19
Post Count: 2861 |
I'm not allowed to make the rematch happen.
If Purge agrees to a rematch, then here are some ground rules.
-Gard1bas can't play
-Onzurk can't play
-Dalt can't play
-Purgence can't play
|
|
Dalt2306Join Date: 2011-09-14
Post Count: 8513 |
you never complained to any of them playing in scrimmages when you were in jcpo lol... and the lies and still continue to contradict yourself just great >_>
|
|
Dalt2306Join Date: 2011-09-14
Post Count: 8513 |
actually i'm still playing i didn't even cheat during the scrimmage so... you can't decide the rules here
|
|
bryceeb9Join Date: 2009-04-19
Post Count: 2861 |
I mean if you disagree with them then I guess no rematch needs to happen, we'll gladly take the win.
You've proven yourself that you're a LS'er, and so has Purge. So I'd rather have NO known LS'ers in our rematch.
Thank you.
|
|
|
you never complained to any of them playing in scrimmages when you were in jcpo [2]
you never complained about them playing because they were gb'd
but because you didnt like them/did want to play with them in general
never had you mentioned the reasoning be is them being gb'd
what's wrong with dalt playing?
he didnt do anything wrong neither is he gb'd or cheat at all
(not looking at the past) |
|
Dalt2306Join Date: 2011-09-14
Post Count: 8513 |
how can you take a win when your player was cheating?????? do you understand what "void" means lol
i proven myself an a lser to 1 scrimmage which was long time ago and haven't done it in any other scrimmage since so again you don't make the rules here buddy
|
|
|
it's not a win
you cheated
that's all there is to it |
|
BanvaxJoin Date: 2012-06-26
Post Count: 2722 |
actually dalt got a warning from that match
he's isn't GB'd fix up on your research dude
edgier than the average edge |
|
bryceeb9Join Date: 2009-04-19
Post Count: 2861 |
"I mean if you disagree with them then I guess no rematch needs to happen, we'll gladly take the win.
You've proven yourself that you're a LS'er, and so has Purge. So I'd rather have NO known LS'ers in our rematch.
Thank you." [2]
Done arguing now.
|
|