|
|
ROBLOX won't be charging $1.99 just to play this game. If this happens, ROBLOX won't be earning that much money and ROBLOX is an imagination platform. Also ROBLOX isn't a country. It's a virtual game. |
|
|
Again, a company has a group of people that can hire and fire the boss. Plus, would you like it if a person told you what happened and you couldn't stop it like "HA! I just took tickets and lifetime builders club away from you." |
|
|
A group of EMPLOYEES make the decisions in a company, not the customer.
Level 666 ROBLOXian |
|
|
Well, I think customer satisfaction is a must when it comes to business. If Roblox wants to keep making money and they want their business to survive for years and decades, then they should accept my idea. |
|
|
Roblox does satisfy their customers, otherwise, they wouldn't be as successful as they are today.
Level 666 ROBLOXian |
|
|
I mean in the future, if the customer satisfaction starts decreasing. Then the Roblox Decision Team will stop this. |
|
|
Also, S&I serves this purpose, whether ROBLOX listens to people complaining about a large update or not is up to them.
Level 666 ROBLOXian |
|
|
What is S&I? Again, if I sound stupid, I apologize. |
|
|
The forum you posted this in.
Suggestions & Ideas.
Level 666 ROBLOXian |
|
|
Oh. Well, now I know how dumb I was to ask that question. Anyway, Roblox's updates rarely ever get reversed, so once and update's put into place, it's put into place! No matter what we say like "AHHHH BRING BACK TICKETS!" the chances of Roblox reversing that update are very slim. We need a team of Robloxians that we voted for to stop a bad update from coming or else it might never get reversed. If this idea is put into place, Roblox will last for several decades, if not centuries. |
|
|
1. Some people have not got a good enough reasoning for ROBLOX.
Example: "I do not want to spend a minute learning the new layout! Remove it even though it looks nice!"
2. Having to make a "speech" is exploitable, a friend can make it for you.
3. I do not agree with having to own a group(in other words have BC and 100 R$).
4. I can make additional accounts, limiting the amount per Internet Protocol(which can be changed anyway) might hurt big families.
5. You changed the idea, I recommend making a new thread after 9 hours from this being posted. |
|
|
Maybe to vote, ROBLOXians will have to have been in ROBLOX for at least 2 years and over 12. Ayy lmao |
|
|
"2. Having a speech is exploitable, a friend could make it for you."
Well if the friend isn't participating in the election by becoming a candidate he/she probably wouldn't waste time on making a speech. If your friend is also a candidate, then you might be running against him. Sure, you might end up paying your friend for him/her to make a speech, but then comes another idea: the impeachment process. If a person has been running for a candidate and does not fulfill the promises he/she had made in a period of time, people could vote him/her out.
"3. I do not agree with having to own a group(in other words have BC and 100R$)."
Well if you can lead a Roblox group you can work your leadership up and become a member of the Robloc Decision Team. Although creating a group requires BC to begin with, former BC members can still own a group. Paying 100 R$ can be a problem, but that's one of the prices you have to pay. I would say they could just let NBC members make a group, but then Roblox would have to do a lot of work to make this Roblox Decision Team a reality.
"4. I can make additional accounts, limiting the amount per internet protocol(which can be changed anyway) might hurt big families."
Okay, you have a point. So that idea of making one account per day on the same wifi network should not be put into effect. So, I made this new idea to prevent alternate accounts. You have to own an account that is at least a month old in order to vote for a candidate.
|
|
|
I disagree. It should be 1 or 2 years. Ayy lmao |
|
|
Five years would be better imo.
Level 666 ROBLOXian |
|
|
"I disagree. It should be 1 or 2 years."
I guess that would make alternate accounts more useless when voting so good idea! To be honest, it should be around 6 months to increase voting population. As for people who were nominated to be a candidate you have to be around Roblox for 1 year so you were with Roblox through many updates and you would have the knowledge of Roblox and you would make great improvements. |
|
|
5 years??? Uhh... There are only a few people who have stayed on Roblox that long. |
|
|
Actually, there's quite a lot who have played for 5+ years.
They're the older and more responsible players of Roblox.
Level 666 ROBLOXian |
|
|
Did I just spell Roblox wrong?
"member of the Robloc Decision Team"
Oh.
I meant to spell it Roblox |
|
|
""2. Having a speech is exploitable, a friend could make it for you."
Well if the friend isn't participating in the election by becoming a candidate he/she probably wouldn't waste time on making a speech. If your friend is also a candidate, then you might be running against him. Sure, you might end up paying your friend for him/her to make a speech, but then comes another idea: the impeachment process. If a person has been running for a candidate and does not do(changed the word for the censorship of under 13 players) the promises he/she had made in a period of time, people could vote him/her out."
1. It is still possible, it can be exploited.
2. Kicking out voting can be abused like this system
""3. I do not agree with having to own a group(in other words have BC and 100R$)."
Well if you can lead a Roblox group you can work your leadership up and become a member of the Roblox(corrected for the under 13 censorship too) Decision Team. Although creating a group requires BC to begin with, former BC members can still own a group. Paying 100 R$ can be a problem, but that's one of the prices you have to pay. I would say they could just not require BC(changed for the under 13 censorship) too make a group, but then Roblox would have to do a lot of work to make this Roblox Decision Team a reality."
OK, we have got our own opinions, this is it, let's end this argument.
""4. I can make additional accounts, limiting the amount per internet protocol(which can be changed anyway) might hurt big families."
Okay, you have a point. So that idea of making one account per day on the same wifi network should not be put into effect. So, I made this new idea to prevent alternate accounts. You have to own an account that is at least a month old in order to vote for a candidate."
Making some accounts and waiting a month is not difficult.
----------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for your reply to my 2nd point, this made me add the 6th point.
6. Trolling. |
|
|
"1. It is still possible, and can be exploited"
Is someone really going to be this desperate just to make decisions for Roblox that decides the entire future of Roblox?
"2. Kicking out voting can be abused like this system"
The only reason you would vote someone out is because you do not like the decisions that he/she is making or he/she did not fulfill the promises he/she made. Well, voting someone else out because you don't like their actions wouldn't happen too often because you voted for them and you trusted them. I don't see how voting someone out can be abused.
"Making accounts and waiting for a month is not difficult."
Yeah, but the election will only last two weeks. The candidates have to make their speeches in that period of time. Plus, I also changed the minimum account age to 6 months. That means you had to play Roblox for at least 6 months to vote. Otherwise, you can't vote. |
|
|
With all my solutions for every problem with this idea, what else could go wrong? |
|
|
""1. It is still possible, and can be exploited"
Is someone really going to be this desperate just to make decisions for Roblox that decides the entire future of Roblox?"
For ROBLOX it might be enough.
""2. Kicking out voting can be abused like this system"
The only reason you would vote someone out is because you do not like the decisions that he/she is making or he/she did not do(you know why) the promises he/she made. Well, voting someone else out because you don't like their actions wouldn't happen too often because you voted for them and you trusted them. I don't see how voting someone out can be abused."
1. I thought ROBLOX is meant to choose.
2. As long as it is possible: "For ROBLOX it might be enough.".
""Making accounts and waiting for a month is not difficult."
Yeah, but the election will only last two weeks. The candidates have to make their speeches in that period of time. Plus, I also changed the minimum account age to 6 months. That means you had to play Roblox for at least 6 months to vote. Otherwise, you can't vote."
"As long as it is possible: "For ROBLOX it might be enough."." |
|
|
Response to MagicGivePen: Remember that the voting population will not be enormous. Only players that are 13+, have their Roblox account linked to an email account, must be in a Robloc Group, and have to be playing Roblox for at least 6 months.
"For Roblox it might be enough"
I guess you're right. People would make alternate accounts just so one person could get elected. I found another solution to this.
Each vote you cast costs 5 R$. You can only vote once on each account.
Is that a good solution? |
|