revansai
#193629035Thursday, July 14, 2016 3:59 PM GMT

"1.0 is classic." Well, explain why a lot of classic objects got tossed out the window
hahahahahaha2366
#193632316Thursday, July 14, 2016 4:53 PM GMT

ROBLOX removing an asset that has stuck with them since beginning times, and has made them distinguishable from other games is a ridiculously redundant action that would only serve to anger the people who just want to use a different, free aesthetic. Your argument states that because something is 'newer', we should do away with the old for no reason. With this logic in hand, should we destroy the hundreds of thousands of residences that have withstood the years and are still being used to this day, merely because a 'new' alternative exists? This act would leave millions homeless, and only cripple the economy and community, but would satisfy your beliefs. TL:DR: It's really dumb.
SpaceInJourney209
#193633868Thursday, July 14, 2016 5:16 PM GMT

No, I don't want to look like a ODer.
YutaAsahina
#193634205Thursday, July 14, 2016 5:21 PM GMT

No. This is RO 'BLOX'. Not RO 'HUMAN' Plus, why not get rid of 3.0 instead?
Pigeooon
#193657870Thursday, July 14, 2016 10:48 PM GMT

I don't understand how people say 2.0 and 3.0 are for "ODers". That doesn't make any sense at all. I use 2.0 all the time, and I use it well. Never once has someone mistaken me for an "ODer", just because of my looks. Like the term "Noob", I think people have lost the meaning of ODer. ODers are people who date online. Not people who use a package that looks more realistic than a bunch of cubes. Also, 3.0 is for the noobs, the new users. You guys are assuming they date online just for using the default package that ROBLOX gives them. See how that doesn't make any sense? I agree, the 3.0 looks extremely dumb, but that doesn't mean that only ODers use it. And if you don't like the look of the 2.0, that's perfectly fine. Just don't buy it. But if you assume someone dates online just because they like that specific package, which, mind you, does not look "seshual" at all, that's not fair.
epicsz205
#193658185Thursday, July 14, 2016 10:52 PM GMT

^ oder ew
far_m
#193658646Thursday, July 14, 2016 10:58 PM GMT

xJulie_Forever 3.0 and 2.0? ODERS? what the heck is wrong with you! I have seen 1.0 OD and they're cancerous no one likes them anymore they think they are mature and clearly not. they ruin the roblox fun experience, they pick on everyone who joined after they did, they're all obnoxious and they should feel how we feel about wearing 2.0 and 3.0. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FpvKDAWlS1A&feature=youtu.be
Pigeooon
#193658934Thursday, July 14, 2016 11:02 PM GMT

^ Exactly! There are ODers across ALL the packages, not just the 2.0 or the 3.0! There are some ODers in 2.0 and 3.0, but that doesn't mean there aren't any with the 1.0!
Rejedt
#193660327Thursday, July 14, 2016 11:22 PM GMT

Do you realize how many users roblox would lose?
Thundermaker300
#193660398Thursday, July 14, 2016 11:23 PM GMT

"Do you realize how many users roblox would lose?" --Great Comment I'm going to add on to that.. Do you realize how many users roblox would lose, as well as money, and possibly have to shut their site down? Buy my easy credit system @ R+://451130605 for an easy way to give people credits, without scripting knowledge or gui designing.
Superdestructo09
#193661787Thursday, July 14, 2016 11:43 PM GMT

this bait is piss poor also has no one pointed out yet that the OP is wearing 1.0?
EpicManXDLA
#193662147Thursday, July 14, 2016 11:48 PM GMT

As long as I has mah overseer Support I guess I like chiken u wanna fite m9?
IoderI
#193665616Friday, July 15, 2016 12:41 AM GMT

@Thundermaker300 OHHH,BECAUSE THEY WILL LITTERALY LOSERS PLAYERS OVER A DAMN PACKAGE.
Thundermaker300
#193665668Friday, July 15, 2016 12:41 AM GMT

yes because a lot of people like that package Buy my easy credit system @ R+://451130605 for an easy way to give people credits, without scripting knowledge or gui designing.
IoderI
#193665724Friday, July 15, 2016 12:42 AM GMT

@Thundermaker300 wow,now a package is more important then anything? a lot of people liked tix it got removed are they losing players?
Thundermaker300
#193665823Friday, July 15, 2016 12:44 AM GMT

yes they are Buy my easy credit system @ R+://451130605 for an easy way to give people credits, without scripting knowledge or gui designing.
Inphormation
#193673313Friday, July 15, 2016 2:20 AM GMT

When did we start saying these packages we're for ODers? e.e Sure some of people Oder with them. Let us Destroy childhoods and nice outfits.
Heyspacedude
#193696702Friday, July 15, 2016 8:28 AM GMT

Nope remove 3.0 and 2.0 and keep 1.0 that's good if they did this i will quit and other players
CODghosts46
#193697085Friday, July 15, 2016 8:44 AM GMT

NO SUPPORT! 1.0 is the classic and original having 4.0 the regular, i would probably not play again without 2.0. And 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 are all called "bad" I don't support this. You're a wizard, cod!
CODghosts46
#193697116Friday, July 15, 2016 8:46 AM GMT

"wow,now a package is more important then anything? a lot of people liked tix it got removed are they losing players?" Actually, they did, BUT not that many that people would see. You're a wizard, cod!
wowzee
#193697171Friday, July 15, 2016 8:49 AM GMT

No <-----
Suggestboy
#193697870Friday, July 15, 2016 9:24 AM GMT

nothings wrong with 1.0
Botbulb
#193697988Friday, July 15, 2016 9:30 AM GMT

I would quit Roblox, so would thousands of others.
WAKESM
#193698273Friday, July 15, 2016 9:46 AM GMT

1.0 is like a classic car. in fact they're basically the same thing; -Been around for a long time (many years) -everyone knows what it is -respected piece of history -looks good -rich people like it :P -I like it I want one. Don't hate, and donate
WAKESM
#193698342Friday, July 15, 2016 9:49 AM GMT

I salute you