|
I'm curious
I know RAA the Autowin
XI the surrender of a small clan
Unofficial RAT
But like anything that actually ended in good terms with both sides? |
|
|
FirewazzzJoin Date: 2015-03-09
Post Count: 3127 |
everyone does it wrong
how war foa won |
|
|
ahpricityJoin Date: 2009-12-02
Post Count: 8146 |
Wasn't XI an autowin too |
|
K_ievJoin Date: 2013-08-25
Post Count: 1346 |
XI was also an autowin, haha.
|
|
|
I'm not too certain if it was or not Madii |
|
K_ievJoin Date: 2013-08-25
Post Count: 1346 |
Shattered I was in XI at the time, I remember seeing Dystra's win declaration thread with absolutely no win screenshots. Just 'refusal to defend' and 'breaking of war terms', you know the usual.
|
|
ahpricityJoin Date: 2009-12-02
Post Count: 8146 |
XI was too full of pride/ego to surrender |
|
|
tbh hard to win wars when nobody accepts/finishes one.
|
|
|
still i just don't like how FoA attempt to say their better than TGI when they don't have an actual war win yet. |
|
K_ievJoin Date: 2013-08-25
Post Count: 1346 |
Aph I can speak for that personally, we always did have lots of pride in our own group, and some of us definitely had an ego going, I doubt we'd surrender.
|
|
ahpricityJoin Date: 2009-12-02
Post Count: 8146 |
It's not entirely FoA's fault.
The XI war was definitely full of bs. So was the RAA war.
OO wasn't ready and the A-SOV war failed to continue.
It's a bad time for war for any/every clan. |
|
|
not saying Dystra's FoA didn't have a pretty valid excuse but still TGI has the overall history and enrichment and etc. blah blah rant
it's the better clan due to it was active during the prime of clans |
|
|
how war did foa won????????????????????????? |
|
|
ahpricityJoin Date: 2009-12-02
Post Count: 8146 |
TGI was alive during a better time and lasted a lot longer than 7-8 months.
Not saying FoA should be able to say they're better, but they need more time before you can compare the two. |
|
|
|
tin didn't TGI accomplish a lot within the first year, i was present around the second year so
and i agree but honestly you shouldn't compare the two clans to begin with since they were present in two different time periods
and TGI does out do it in principles, seeing the whole Paul leaving right after the VAK war got canceled and dragoon issues |
|
daeshHJoin Date: 2015-11-20
Post Count: 942 |
I'm not sure who said FoA was better than TGI but I certainly wouldn't say that just yet. |
|
|
TGI did quite a bit during the first and second years and had so much more potential than anything new on the "market" even to this day,
i would rather fight with TGI again than fight with FoA, even if there was war term breaking and other problems
|
|
ahpricityJoin Date: 2009-12-02
Post Count: 8146 |
Yeah, but w/e. FoA just needs a better high command and to focus on things besides winning. Common problems. |
|
|
|
All I hear is blah,blah,blah.
|
|
|
I ended the war with XI because we were literally a week old when they declared war and they were just looking for some cheap hype in the first place. Not looking to make a war work. They used SF mercs and then began literally refusing to defend servers for an entire day after we began winning. We weren't able to win any raids because they refused to defend.
Ended the war 1-2 in their favor since it wasn't enjoyable and we weren't really interested in a war at that point in time in the first place. We had bigger problems on our hands.
As for RAA and SCU, I declared a definite victory over RAA because we were up 15-3 even after their constant cheating and they were trying to weasel their way out of the war. I could have called a victory against SCU too since we were also smashing them but I chose not to.
OO war didn't work out since they weren't ready. Ended pre-war at 11-0 in our favor.
A-SOV war was mutually agreed to be ended.
I had to begin the process of transferring the group before the RAT war got underway.
|
|