|
Still think Ndomakung Suh is still a good D-lineman in the NFL
Yet he was 54th in sacks with 6 |
|
|
That guy was a beast, what happened |
|
|
|
You mean surrounded by a solid d-line that gave him opportunities
There is no "one man" defensive line, JJ Watt is now way more dominant despite the triple teams cause of the threat of Vince Wilfork |
|
|
I'm talking about his Nebraska days.
That is a scary human being, still his job is to mostly clog dat run |
|
|
DT's are not supposed to get sacks, they are supposed to stop the run.
Idk what miami's run stopping ranking was but i do know they struggled. |
|
zim347Join Date: 2007-04-30
Post Count: 25482 |
Of course a DEs and outside pass rushers like Watt will have more sacks Lol
sacks dont measure you being good or not especially inside line men |
|
|
ESPN is giving the image of Suh that he is a dominant d-lineman and that he can sack the QB repeatedly |
|
|
A Haynesworth contract happened |
|
zim347Join Date: 2007-04-30
Post Count: 25482 |
well espn stopped being good at covering sports like 10 years ago so im not surprised |
|
|
No they're not? They potray Suh as a monster interior lineman capable of eating up everything from the LG to the RG. They don't potray him as a sack master. ### #### #### out of your ass. |
|