of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

jcmkiller9
#198168546Saturday, September 10, 2016 6:42 AM GMT

to my extent of what i'm aware of, ROBLOX report mod's are given A LOT of reports to go through. but a lot of them are either UNREAD, or just not valid (that could mean he or she isn't breaking any rules, or if there's no evidence, or if the report was just fake all together.) and this could really take a toll on the protection of our community. a lot of exploiters today, will be reported up to ten times a day. and it would take around a MONTH or more for them actually put in the consequence, mainly because there's just so many, a lot of them are unread. so my solution is a player involving system called the RRV (ROBLOX Report Validation) these players are given a select limit of reports every day (this can vary from ROBLOX's mods decision), all they have to do is see if the information is VALID or INVALID, they do these for Rewards (this can be a hat only to those who are in RRV and do well, or possibly a small robux reward after every stack of reports for that day is done (my suggestion would be around 5-10 robux but its completely up to the mods) if they do really well in the span of a few days depends on the pay.) If its valid, the players select VALID and its send to the report mods, and if its INVALID, then its ignored and dropped. but every now and then, there will be a random checkup on your INVALID reports. if a report mod gets a INVALID report, or a VALID report was put INVALID, the player will get a strike. 3 strikes in one day will remove the chance of getting a hat every now and then [probably around once a month a appreciation hat will be released to those who do well]) and will take a toll on the small robux reward, too many strikes before the month ends, they can possibly be removed from RRV. on the topic of robux and hats, the player is rewarded the next day if they finished yesterday's reports, when he/she gets his/hers next file of reports. now that the system is explained there are some limitations All invalid reports MUST have a reason to enter, you must at least belong to any kind of BC must have a @cc age over 2 yrs and all those who enter must be tested with a few examples of what they'l be doing after testing, they'l get a message explaining if they passed or did not pass if the player passes, exactly 24 hrs after the message is sent, the player will get their first set of reports to validate. this will help filter out the useless reports of those who are lying, not breaking rules, ect, from the actual reports that can have consequences to those breaking the rules. this will lower the amount of invalid reports the mods will have to deal with, increasing the chances of a valid report getting read or get to a valid report faster without all the invalid ones in the way. this should filter out most of those who break the rules, from the good innocent players of our community who deserve a good time in ROBLOX. if you have ANY questions, or anything that you just don't understand, Please post in the replies. Ill get to replies as fast as I can
jcmkiller9
#198168914Saturday, September 10, 2016 6:56 AM GMT

I really devoted a lot of time into this. time ill never get back. and yet no one cares about this creative unique idea.
theprokillr1122334
#198168939Saturday, September 10, 2016 6:56 AM GMT

this dont matter, all roblox needs to ### ## tix back or free robux thats all
jcmkiller9
#198168989Saturday, September 10, 2016 6:59 AM GMT

tix is not and never will be comming back, get over it. how to get robux (1337% legit) 1)stop being lazy 2)go earn cash 3)buy bc/robux I litterly raked lawns for my cash.
crazygurl
#198169159Saturday, September 10, 2016 7:06 AM GMT

I think it'd also be good to have a "Trust" system based on how many reports you've handled, and the accuracy of the reports. UserA who handled 1000 reports and was right about 50% of them will have himself called into question for accuracy, Reports he handles might be sent to somebody else for further validation UserB handles 1000 reports and is right about 99% of them, their decision is taken more seriously when considering passing a request onto actual staff.
jcmkiller9
#198169241Saturday, September 10, 2016 7:09 AM GMT

well, if a player gets a report wrong, they're given a strike. too many strikes results in a lower reward if a player gets so many strikes within that month, the player will be removed from the group. and i doubt it would be around 1k reports each. because a player gets it DAILY, it would probably be less than 100
jcmkiller9
#198169434Saturday, September 10, 2016 7:17 AM GMT

going to bed, if you have questions. leave them here and check back tommorow :) please support and have a wonderful day
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#198169677Saturday, September 10, 2016 7:28 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
crazygurl
#198169813Saturday, September 10, 2016 7:33 AM GMT

Well, Not really, you can't TERMINATE people under this proposed system of his. You #### # report "Real/fake" and if you are a trustworthy enough person it passes it on to a real moderator; who actually takes an action if the user reported has made an actionable offense.
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#198169853Saturday, September 10, 2016 7:35 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
harleybog6
#198169924Saturday, September 10, 2016 7:38 AM GMT

Let me correct your thread a bit corrected version: To my extent of what I'm aware of, ROBLOX report mod's are given A LOT of reports to go through. But a lot of them are either UNREAD, or just not valid (that could mean he or she isn't breaking any rules, or if there's no evidence, or if the report was just fake altogether.) and this could take a toll on the protection of our community. A lot of exploiters today will be declared up to ten times a day. And it would take around a MONTH or more for them put in the consequence, mainly because there's just so many, a lot of them are unread. so my solution is a player involving system called the RRV (ROBLOX Report Validation) these players are given a select limit of reports every day (this can vary from ROBLOX's mods decision), all they have to do is see if the information is VALID or INVALID, they do these for Rewards (this can be a hat only to those who are in RRV and do well, or possibly a small robux reward after every stack of reports for that day is done (my suggestion would be around 5-10 robux, but it's completely up to the mods) if they do really well in the span of a few days depends on the pay.) If it's valid, the players select VALID and its send to the report mods, and if its INVALID, then it's ignored and dropped. But now and then, there will be a random checkup on your INVALID reports. If a story mod gets an INVALID report, or a VALID report was put INVALID, the player will get a strike. 3 strikes in one day will remove the chance of getting a hat now and then [probably around once a month an appreciation cap will be released to those who do well]) and will take a toll on the small robux reward, too many strikes before the month ends, they can be removed from RRV. on the topic of robux and hats, the player is paid the next day if they finished yesterday's reports, when he/she gets his/hers next file of reports. now with the system explained there are some limitations All invalid reports MUST have a reason to en#########o###ust at least belong to any BC must have a @cc age over two yrs and all those who enter must be tested with a few examples of what they'll be doing after testing, they'll get a message explaining if they passed or did not pass if the player moves, exactly 24 hrs after the message is sent, the player will get their first set of reports to validate. This will help filter out the useless reports of those who are lying, not breaking rules, etc., from the actual stories that can have consequences to those breaking the rules. This will lower the amount of invalid reports the mods will have to deal with, increasing the chances of a valid report getting read or get to an accurate report faster without all the invalid ones in the way. This should filter out most of those who break the rules, from the real innocent players of our community who deserve a good time in ROBLOX. If you have ANY questions or anything that you just don't understand, Please post in the replies. I'll get to replies as fast as I can -If you hate my stuff, shut up and do better.
crazygurl
#198169939Saturday, September 10, 2016 7:39 AM GMT

You don't have to shout no support, We already know your stance on the issue :/ Anyways, Invalid marks get checked by other users again, and there's some manner of trust/accuracy building up over time (And with the lax state of ROBLOX moderation, It's worth anything that slips through the cracks in the meantime!) Alternatively, You could make it a system you have to sign up for specially, and can be discharged if you screw up too much
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#198169990Saturday, September 10, 2016 7:41 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
crazygurl
#198170020Saturday, September 10, 2016 7:43 AM GMT

I mean, You answered your own question, It could require you be 18, Which would eliminate most of the little kiddies, with some form of serious validation.
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#198170040Saturday, September 10, 2016 7:44 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
crazygurl
#198170242Saturday, September 10, 2016 7:53 AM GMT

So basically outsourcing moderation to users who work for very little technically. which is a good idea considering it could just as easily be a volunteer position.
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#198170254Saturday, September 10, 2016 7:54 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
Internecivus
#198173957Saturday, September 10, 2016 11:22 AM GMT

No. Things like this work on other games because the playerbase is more mature. You can't outsource moderation to eight year olds. It doesn't work. Also, I'm pretty sure these reports will be uncensored to show the admin what's actually being said, and I don't think parents want their children learning every vulgar word in 20 different languages over the course of a week.
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#198173994Saturday, September 10, 2016 11:24 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
crazygurl
#198181706Saturday, September 10, 2016 2:56 PM GMT

3/10s of Roblox's "millions of players" is enough to significantly boost response time methinks.
megaweegeekiller
#198181869Saturday, September 10, 2016 2:59 PM GMT

No support. Say someone got salty, and decided to use the option "ban everyone". That would be horrible. We could start by not allowing people to judge on reports about them, or about reports they submitted, but it still isn't foolproof.
Crispello
#198182638Saturday, September 10, 2016 3:11 PM GMT

WOW BC ONLY NO WHAT I WOULD TRUST MYSELF MORE THAN STICKMASTERLUKE
Do_geMasterYT
#198183878Saturday, September 10, 2016 3:33 PM GMT

Support. We need this RRV. this is a siggy which means i have R$34 robux.
crazygurl
#198186239Saturday, September 10, 2016 4:12 PM GMT

Mods aren't always, but can absolutely be, biased. and the reviewers wouldn't have true power, Did you not read the suggestion :/?
HalfPinky456
#198186894Saturday, September 10, 2016 4:23 PM GMT

"a lot of exploiters today, will be reported up to ten times a day" source? "it would take around a MONTH or more" source?? nothin' like a good argument ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right