of     1   

Henrypika
#198554748Friday, September 16, 2016 11:54 PM GMT

I suggest we make a "toolbox" for authors so they can lock their threads or ban certain players from their threads. With a few exceptions of course... 1. Certain Sub-Forums will have this... For example, the RolePlayForum could use this to get rid of spammers and bots, but OT will not have this tool due to the fact that it's OffTopic. 2. If you are banned for something that seems unreasonable, you can appeal to the Author to get unbanned. All things considered, this is basically what forum moderators do, but players can control the flow of their own threads. Thanks for reading.
DroppedDaBass
#198555054Friday, September 16, 2016 11:59 PM GMT

Support
FollowTheLOL
#198555628Saturday, September 17, 2016 12:10 AM GMT

Considering the amount of opinion that flows in and out of here, the author of a thread would just silence a person if they have a different opinion. And S&I is about opinion. So...sorry, but no support.
Henrypika
#198555935Saturday, September 17, 2016 12:16 AM GMT

Banning will not be allowed in S&I if that's the case... If the author abouses their powers, they will not be able to use them... For a certain duration, and permanently if it gets bad enough.
HollieSparkles
#198556048Saturday, September 17, 2016 12:18 AM GMT

no support it's too abusable
Sufganiyot
#198556062Saturday, September 17, 2016 12:18 AM GMT

I kind of support. All toasters toast toast! | R$105
Henrypika
#198556686Saturday, September 17, 2016 12:29 AM GMT

In what ways are they abusable, and how do you want to fix it?
HollieSparkles
#198556933Saturday, September 17, 2016 12:34 AM GMT

not add this at all
Henrypika
#198557003Saturday, September 17, 2016 12:35 AM GMT

And Hollie is being a troll, next question. Why do you partially support?
HollieSparkles
#198557128Saturday, September 17, 2016 12:38 AM GMT

I'm not trolling this is a bad idea
Henrypika
#198557296Saturday, September 17, 2016 12:41 AM GMT

Then TELL ME WHY? There's always a reason, and if you don't give me an answer, that will be marked as a Support.
HollieSparkles
#198580933Saturday, September 17, 2016 10:30 AM GMT

"that will be marked as a support" ok op is trolling
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#198581039Saturday, September 17, 2016 10:35 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
Henrypika
#198598425Saturday, September 17, 2016 5:38 PM GMT

You have to have a reason to "not support" it. It's called constructive criticism.

    of     1