of     1   

Skull_LDS
#199681206Thursday, October 06, 2016 8:02 PM GMT

1. Baltimore Ravens (1-1): While many may argue with this placement, and say they should be lower since they've taken a loss, they really should be 2-0. This team earned their win against the Steelers, and definitely outplayed them in the first half. And against the Jets they FF'd because they showed up too late, they a played a game for fun and stats, and crushed the Jets 18-0. I placed them over the Patriots, because the Patriots only beat the Jets by a last minute field goal. However, this team needs to get under control. UndelightedIV has been ejected twice, Era_Gamer has been ejected, and Godly_Trent has been ejected. If they can get under control then this team can definitely win the SB. Players to Watch: UndelightedIV, Era_Gamer, JayDabII, Hype_SlashSavage 2. New England Patriots (2-0): This team has a number of promising players that are very familiar with one another, and coordinated, and while they may be undefeated its hard to say how well this record will hold up. In week 1 they played the Jets one of the worst teams in the AFC, and the league. To whom, they only beat by 2 points. They did score much better against Miami, but they are one of the worst teams in the league as well. As of now it is hard to judge how well this team will do against real challenges, week 3 will tell us though. Players to Watch: BrandonWalkerII, JaredWalkerLXXXI, StarLitoh, ShadeyWalkerXXII 3. Pittsburgh Steelers (1-1): IMO, I think this team is better than the New England Patriots. They have all the same players they had last season, with which they beat the Patriots 47-18 and 71-68 (week 2 and AFC Championship, respectively). However, to try to remain objective I looked at the team's records to determine who should be ranked higher. But, more about the steelers now. If this team can improve upon their QB and defensive organization then they can do a whole lot better. While they lead the league in points scored, they also lead the league in most yards allowed on them. Players to Watch: Skullsmasher000, h3h20, OhNebula, DaGreatBacon 4. Green Bay Packers (2-0): While I know there may be people that disagree with this, I would like them to be objective and look at what this team has actually done. In week 1, while they did win (by FF), they were losing 22-12. Their QB received the lowest QBR yet, and their team performance overall was very poor. In week 2 it was a 0-0 FF game, so far all we can judge them on is that 1 poor performance. Until they show us differently, its hard to rank them any higher. Watch out Players: Aoexus, MrJigglish, Datchaos, ton6cub 5. New York Jets (1-1): This team, while they did win (by FF), did not score a single point with their new FO in week 2. While they have many talented players that show their team has promise, its hard to say how well they can do. Granted, they did play one of the best teams, with some of the same players in week 2 and almost won, but they have a new FO now, and new players. Week 3 should be a good predictor of if this team can succeed. Watch out Players: Zillive 6. Miami Dolphins (0-2): Unfortunately, they couldn't get a consistent QB and so their FO left after week 2. However, their new FO, Timothy6115, shows promise and should be able to bring this team together and turn it around. Watch out Players: Timothy6115 7. Seattle Seahawks (1-1): I don't even know... Watch out Players: Non-existent 8. Dallas Cowboys (0-2): ^
HatersGC
#199686033Thursday, October 06, 2016 9:41 PM GMT

ofc he doesnt put me in the players to watch whipdab
BrandonWalkerII
#199694082Friday, October 07, 2016 12:22 AM GMT

Where's my man's lulenzo
Skull_LDS
#199696296Friday, October 07, 2016 1:09 AM GMT

I tried to pick top 4 for each team, as he had no stats he did not appear in my top 4
MrJigglish
#199709935Friday, October 07, 2016 10:05 AM GMT

I see skull's making those power plays to justify QBOTY again, not putting Monster in Players to watch out for, mentioning his failures etc. But then again, Apparently the last Steelers game should have been an FF loss, So Steelers higher than us in rankings, when they should have been 0-2, makes no sense. Week 1, Monster was trash I aint gonna lie,(he admitted so himself) but then again what do you expect when the team doesn't practice at all for 2 weeks prior, because the team we we were playing had 0 members until 5 minutes before the game. Should have been an FF, Was a fault on Skulls behalf tbh, so you cant count that as a "weak" performance, Because we could do the same for the last Steelers victory, Which would mean our "performance" record is surely better. But w/e MrJigglish
Skull_LDS
#199712527Friday, October 07, 2016 12:51 PM GMT

I based these on the performance of players thus far. As you all have played only 1 game (which I am not blaming on you, the other team FF'd not you) and in that game, Monster, as you said it yourself did not perform well. I think there were 4 better players than him so far, so I put those people up there. Monster would have been next on the list for Players to Watch, but I am only doing top 4 for each team, sometimes less. I don't know what you mean that the last steelers game should have been a FFL...Can you explain that? It is your fault however, that your team did not practice for 2 weeks prior, when 1 of those weeks would have been the SB week of last season. These rankings reflected (or so I believe) team and player performance. Since you all did not perform as well as you could have I placed you all much lower. I tried to recognize each team's greatest faults, for the Steelers, thats our defense and QB. For the Packers, it was mainly just your QB that has done poorly so far. Sorry you disagree with these power rankings, I hope if we can each better understand one another we can end all this arguing.
MrJigglish
#199713628Friday, October 07, 2016 1:47 PM GMT

^ Its cool I understand the rankings, their fair based on What occurred. I was also just stating that some people were suggesting that the last game steelers played should have been an FF (Im sitting on the fence here idk), but the same occurred week 1(With us) when people were suggesting redo's/No FF's etc. Also regarding the Training, We did train for the Superbowl, But players like Me,Ton, Datch to an extent and Monster (4 out of our starting 7) Not playing. Monster away on important business, AOE benching both me and Ton for randomers (He says otherwise but we never got played instead of SB Mercenarys) and datch who got tired of all the BS in the game eventually leaving for something else. At that point none of us wanted to train or play rofootball, and their was an internal issue with the team cohesion/chemistry. This I understand to be our fault, but when you see the first two teams you play in the league, with either no FO or no players, theirs no point in practising if your wasting your time anyway. It would seem out of order or rude for me to say that week 1's narrow victory was Monsters fault, because to an extent half our team were not awake on Defence (Especially Deep), with our DE not doing work (Until I swapped in for them). And on Offence with monster not Throwing good we had to rely on running plays, I can only block so many people at once, our WR's/TE's were not awake on the day. Im not arguing, but some people on our team get angry/sour etc (Which IMO is understandable). MrJigglish

    of     1