SkydricJoin Date: 2008-05-20
Post Count: 8026 |
The election is thankfully already secured. |
|
|
not really its a tie rn its gonna be really close to be honest
|
|
SkydricJoin Date: 2008-05-20
Post Count: 8026 |
No, the media has been exposed and has admitted for rigging the primaries already (not just the party candidacy).
Even with the rigged polls (which are ever closing in on Trump's victory because they need to maintain an appearance of credibility and can't if they are proven to have shown misinformation), Trump is cutting Hillary's supposed 'lead' exponentially in Colorado, Nevada, New Hampshire, Michigan, Wisconsin, Virginia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and a single electoral delegate from Maine.
It is mathematically impossible for him to lose, even with the rigged polls you are able to see in the media today. |
|
SkydricJoin Date: 2008-05-20
Post Count: 8026 |
I have lived in Michigan my entire life by the way, and I have yet to see a SINGLE Hillary clinton sign in my entire state.
Granted, they're mostly probably in the western region because that's where the wealthy majority of Michigan lives, but the eastern portion (including lots of Detroit because they're tired of democrats screwing them over) is actually quite heavily supportive of Trump-Pence. |
|
SkydricJoin Date: 2008-05-20
Post Count: 8026 |
b |
|
|
|
the cities generally screw republicans over and not all the polls are rigged thats just ignorant as it stands he needs one blue state to win and the blue firewall still stands
|
|
HlCOMJoin Date: 2009-03-29
Post Count: 3332 |
ℍ𝕀𝔾ℍ 𝔼ℕ𝔼ℝ𝔾𝕐 |
|
SkydricJoin Date: 2008-05-20
Post Count: 8026 |
It's not ignorant to assume the polls are rigged. It is clearly proven through wikileaks and the DNC's admittance to it.
Trump will probably end up winning over New York too, as it's his home-state and there's quite a lot of shy republicans there. |
|
|
###### has been in the double digits in new york every single poll and it goes blue every recent election i dont disagree that some of the polls are dishonest its just that the election isnt secured its very close and when you start to take in the fact that hes against the ######## and they wont play fair it starts looking even worse |
|
icebleedJoin Date: 2013-01-30
Post Count: 2043 |
Sick of these Trump supporters to be honest. And no, I am not saying Hillary is clean in fact I think she is quite the opposite.
Also, don't post these political threads on C&G
kthx
Hillary and Trump are alone stuck on an island. Who survives?
America.
|
|
|
"Wrong." - Donald J. Trump, 2016. |
|
|
anonharry is one of those annoying people who constantly say
"hah, both of the candidates are trash. america = DOOMED!!!"
|
|
icebleedJoin Date: 2013-01-30
Post Count: 2043 |
And Bloodborne is one of those annoying people who think there is a good choice in this election.
Also, I don't see how I'm annoying because I think that. If you can explain further, I might agree.
|
|
|
Either pick one or be quiet you bystandar insignificant. |
|
icebleedJoin Date: 2013-01-30
Post Count: 2043 |
@Imperial That's a pretty ignorant view considering there are more candidates than just Hillary and Trump.
|
|
FrostarkzJoin Date: 2011-03-22
Post Count: 14325 |
TRUMP 4 PREZ |
|
|
there's certainly a good choice in this election you can choose NOT to have someone who has been caught, multiple times: evading the law by having friends in positions, selling positions to the highest bidder, carelessly putting american security at risk then adamantly lying about it for years, toppling entire countries in the middle east for special interests, etc. the list goes on. for people like you who so firmly believe that there isn't any choice, your only option is to abstain. and people who refuse to vote are legitimately disgusting human beings who should be ######## of their right to vote and given to someone who is dying, sometimes literally, to have your opportunity to cast a ballot without oppression every 4 years if you vote 3rd party, you're throwing your vote away. there is absolutely no chance for ##### ###### or ######## - 2 of those embarrass themselves on a daily basis and are far worse than clinton or trump. |
|
|
god bless chat filter there's certainly a good choice in this election you can choose NOT to have someone who has been caught, multiple times: evading the law by having friends in positions, selling positions to the highest bidder, carelessly putting american security at risk then adamantly lying about it for years, toppling entire countries in the middle east for special interests, etc. the list goes on. for people like you who so firmly believe that there isn't any choice, your only option is to abstain. and people who refuse to vote are legitimately disgusting human beings who should be ######## of their right to vote and given to someone who is dying, sometimes literally, to have your opportunity to cast a ballot without oppression every 4 years if you vote 3rd party, you're throwing your vote away. there is absolutely no chance for those candidates - 2 of those embarrass themselves on a daily basis and are far worse than clinton or trump. |
|
|
ok im done trying to stop the fitler from breaking indentions
have fun reading |
|
|
You realize that Trump is down like 20+ points in MI right? |
|
|
the exact reason we have 2 unfavorable candidates is because of the elitist system found in elections and government
trump won because he's against that system. hillary, well, she brute-forced it by using that system.
if you're truly against constantly having unfavorable candidates that somehow win the nomination despite nobody liking them, then it's pretty clear who you need to vote for in a few days. |
|
icebleedJoin Date: 2013-01-30
Post Count: 2043 |
@Blood Instead, I choose someone who has committed criminal acts against woman, has vague policies, flip flops within seconds, refused to release taxes, gives the most obscure and ignorant answers during debates?
There is no good choice. A best choice but no good choice.
|
|
icebleedJoin Date: 2013-01-30
Post Count: 2043 |
And bankrupted 3 businesses. So much for a great businessman right?
|
|
|
"I choose someone who has committed criminal acts against woman,"
there is absolutely no case or evidence that he did "criminal acts" against a woman.
"has vague policies, flip flops within seconds, gives the most obscure and ignorant answers during debates?"
completely objective, no need to debate. unless you want to specifically point out vagueness or ignorance in any of his policies.
|
|