DeeruiaJoin Date: 2015-03-16
Post Count: 90 |
@Sufganiyot You can just create a new roleset, and give them all the permissions. However, they cannot use group funds, and not only this. But their name is not featured on the "Owned By:" under the group logo. I'm talking about making them a listed owner, not just making a rank a pretending they are the co-owner when they can't do half the stuff the owner can do.
I suggest you take the time to read my post "INTRODUCTION TO NEW IDEA:" to get an better idea if you haven't. [2]
|
|
|
@Helloburp; you keep disapproving of the idea, yet you never give a direct reason as to why you are doing so.
|
|
EnrxqJoin Date: 2012-11-30
Post Count: 666 |
Unnecessary and abusable [2]
|
|
DeeruiaJoin Date: 2015-03-16
Post Count: 90 |
@Enrxq If you could, give reasons to why it is so, that would be really great. Otherwise, I'll have to say that this is nothing but blind hate on a idea. If you'd be able to give some reasons, I'd be more than happy to respond.
Please don't just say "Unnecessary and abusable". List the reasons to why it is, or else we can't really improve the idea, now can we? |
|
Lem0nzzxJoin Date: 2016-02-08
Post Count: 1604 |
The only way to make this fair is to make groups cost robux, and you have to pay robux to be an owner in the group, and yes it sounds confusing but when you join a group someone paid to make you're in it. Now when you think of it this way you can make a rank for Co Owners, but it costs robux to be in the rank for the person you want to promote. Something like that.
|
|
DeeruiaJoin Date: 2015-03-16
Post Count: 90 |
@Lem0nzzx "Now, as I've stated before this roleset would cost 100 ROBUX to create. The rolesets "Rank" will also be locked at 254 making sure the co-owner rank is always right below the owner rank."
In my new idea the co-owner rank costs 100 ROBUX while normal rolesets cost 25 ROBUX to make I don't fully understand your post, but I think that's what your trying to get at. |
|
Lem0nzzxJoin Date: 2016-02-08
Post Count: 1604 |
I don't like your idea because it's making the owner of the group pay more money just for them to get scammed. It's turning a smaller problem into a bigger one, which is why I don't support it. However, in my opinion I believe if we made the scammer pay in some way as well (such as to be the rank in the group), then we're all good, and I don't believe they'd abuse it as much. I mean if you think of it this way someone's always going to abuse no matter what, that's just how it is.
|
|
DeeruiaJoin Date: 2015-03-16
Post Count: 90 |
Well, I don't really understand how buying a roleset is a scam, but... Frankly I'm quite confused with what you're trying to say. It's one payment of 100 ROBUX for the roleset, then... You put the co-owner in that co-owner roleset I keep talking about. |
|
DeeruiaJoin Date: 2015-03-16
Post Count: 90 |
Bump. |
|
DeeruiaJoin Date: 2015-03-16
Post Count: 90 |
Bump. |
|
zakman97Join Date: 2009-06-08
Post Count: 930 |
#Support
|
|
|
This wouldn't be a good idea because of it mainly being able to be a duo. There should be a possibility of having more than 2 leaders if this should be added, this post by you was also focused on egotism and arrogance. |
|
|
I had some grammatic errors in my post I think but you should still be able to get my point. |
|
|
DeeruiaJoin Date: 2015-03-16
Post Count: 90 |
@Naxxanar I see your point, I did indeed use our group as a base for my idea. As it was a perfect example (for me) of what I wanted my idea to be, a way for friends to make a group together and both be allowed to have decent power in the group.
However, I wasn't really thinking about a third person or even a forth person. Which is my mistake to be honest, as I was too focus on making this idea made around our group. So, thanks for pointing that out.
Therefore, I'm going to make a few changes to my previously mentioned "Co-Owner" roleset.
Instead of being limited to one co-owner, maybe it could be up to at least 5 people. That way, more people will be able to enjoy the benefits of the new roleset.
Thank you for your feedback! |
|
|
MaxuimMaxJoin Date: 2013-08-02
Post Count: 3527 |
support fully |
|
DeeruiaJoin Date: 2015-03-16
Post Count: 90 |
Bump. |
|
DeeruiaJoin Date: 2015-03-16
Post Count: 90 |
Bump. |
|
|
@Colbert But make it an easier feature to use, so you don't have to delete ranks. Make a bar where you can type in the username of a second user and make them a co-owner of the group.
Me For President. https://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=203255128 |
|
DeeruiaJoin Date: 2015-03-16
Post Count: 90 |
Bump. |
|
nopants99Join Date: 2013-07-25
Post Count: 3444 |
no support because if they have different ideas and wont go with one person there is no one that is higher who can just go with their diea |
|
DeeruiaJoin Date: 2015-03-16
Post Count: 90 |
bump |
|
mrjay07Join Date: 2014-06-18
Post Count: 29 |
Support; I Think it would Work. Making 2 People own the Group would Help make Groups who need Two Poeple to run.
mrjay07 |
|
|
This would be good if not for the human psychology. People are selfish idiots who want to betray and abuse their friends and associates. |
|