trainermariopokemon
#203314445Friday, December 02, 2016 5:05 PM GMT

"Everything was fine" "until the Fire nati- ACCESSORY UPDATE Attacked"
Junkful
#203314477Friday, December 02, 2016 5:05 PM GMT

This is the current system: -Three hats; -one hair; My system would be like this: -one hat; -three hair; Is one not less than three?" What in the world? That's not what I said. "This is the current system: -Three hats; -one hair; -one face; -one neck; -one shoulder; -one front; -one back; -one waist" Literally quoted. Please.
fourpapa1
#203314621Friday, December 02, 2016 5:08 PM GMT

The difference is, if Modern Medusa & Rising Sun Samurai both count as hats, which I'm assuming they will, then my hat combo is screwed, along with many more.
GummyBuns_CamGirlXxX
#203314725Friday, December 02, 2016 5:10 PM GMT

@Junkful I think whatever you go with it's going to annoy people. I personally would rather see a whole rework of hats and such where they match perfectly and no clipping happens, but then some people would want clipping for certain appearance effects and such. Not to mention a whole rework would severely some annoy people who have been on ROBLOX for years who are resistant to change. Honestly though a top-to-bottom rework of the whole of ROBLOX to modernise it and make it look visually superior and more uniform would be my ultimate wish. At some point legacy content and relics of the past need to be removed and reinstated with better systems, improved content, etc. ROBLOX is kind of a mess atm.
Junkful
#203314785Friday, December 02, 2016 5:11 PM GMT

This is my idealized version of the new system: My system would be like this: -three hat; -one hair; -one face; -one neck; -one shoulder; -one front; -one back; -one waist or -one hat; -three hair; -one face; -one neck; -one shoulder; -one front; -one back; -one waist or -one hat; -one hair; -three face; -one neck; -one shoulder; -one front; -one back; -one waist or -one hat; -one hair; -one face; -three neck; -one shoulder; -one front; -one back; -one waist or -one hat; -one hair; -one face; -one neck; -three shoulder; -one front; -one back; -one waist or -one hat; -one hair; -one face; -one neck; -one shoulder; -three front; -one back; -one waist or -one hat; -one hair; -one face; -one neck; -one shoulder; -one front; -three back; -one waist or -one hat; -one hair; -one face; -one neck; -one shoulder; -one front; -or back; -three waist See the difference in it? That's the only way to simplify it.
Junkful
#203314833Friday, December 02, 2016 5:12 PM GMT

All the or's mean that they're all possibilities within this new system.
Junkful
#203314891Friday, December 02, 2016 5:13 PM GMT

And it says "three", but it can also be two.
GummyBuns_CamGirlXxX
#203314965Friday, December 02, 2016 5:15 PM GMT

@Junk I'd have it where accessories were divided into more categories, e.g. Hats Hair Glasses Neckwear/Necklaces Shoulder accessories Arm accessories Misc. Items etc. And no limit on individual categories, just a set number on how many items you can wear.
Junkful
#203315026Friday, December 02, 2016 5:16 PM GMT

"And no limit on individual categories, just a set number on how many items you can wear." Why? Wouldn't it make people wear a LOT of accessories?
GummyBuns_CamGirlXxX
#203315096Friday, December 02, 2016 5:17 PM GMT

@Junkful Yes, but like I said in an older comment, I'd rework how hats interact and fit and update all models to remove clipping, or items being worn over items, and instead make them fit together correctly.
Junkful
#203315148Friday, December 02, 2016 5:18 PM GMT

I see. I thought this might just fix the "combo" problem people are having.
Brusts
#203315571Friday, December 02, 2016 5:26 PM GMT

"And no limit on individual categories, just a set number on how many items you can wear." that would be way too much keep it limited at 10 accessories but people should be able to wear 3 accessories from the same category, and not only hats you can currently choose 3 hats, but you cannot choose 3 hairs, instead, you can choose 1 (from each category you can choose 1 btw) now let's say you want 3 shoulder accessories you can pick it! !! (but the system is the same as hats, once chosen the 3 accessories from the same category, you can only pick one accessory to wear from other types) it's not complicated really and im not sure if roblox is ever planning a rework of hats interacting and whatnot
iiExsy
#203315834Friday, December 02, 2016 5:30 PM GMT

Personally, I do not like the accessories idea at all! I think it was easier to just have all the hats you own in one place, when now, we have to find them and it limits how many hairs you wear. I know it's a good thing to some people, but how I think they should have it setup is that you can wear three of every item, creating an easier way to make combinations of hats. I honestly think it's ridiculous how the 'accessories' are set up. I think my way to set them up would give a LOT of people a better reason to buy hats in the first place.
Junkful
#203315994Friday, December 02, 2016 5:34 PM GMT

3 of every category is way too much. 3 of the same category and 1 of any other category also allows you with amazing combinations.
Junkful
#203316580Friday, December 02, 2016 5:44 PM GMT

You can choose 3 accessories from any category, not only hats. And along with them you can pick one accessory from every category. You'd still wear 10 hats basically, with a wider variety of combos. It's almost the same as the current system, the difference is "any category." In four sentences. That's how easy it is. There's no need for 3 accessories for EACH category. That would be 24 hats you're wearing.
Junkful
#203378877Saturday, December 03, 2016 9:24 AM GMT

lol
Junkful
#203408654Saturday, December 03, 2016 6:14 PM GMT

BUMPSS
Junkful
#203410521Saturday, December 03, 2016 6:33 PM GMT

bump
ChrisMichaelBaron
#203411438Saturday, December 03, 2016 6:41 PM GMT

Let us all assume that when I say hats I mean everything in the accessories categories including hats. I've said this in many posts recently, all that needs to be done is this: You are stuck with the three hats limit, but you can have as many hats from each category as you want assuming that you can only have three altogether.
Junkful
#203412199Saturday, December 03, 2016 6:48 PM GMT

"Let us all assume that when I say hats I mean everything in the accessories categories including hats. I've said this in many posts recently, all that needs to be done is this: You are stuck with the three hats limit, but you can have as many hats from each category as you want assuming that you can only have three altogether." Yes, this is essentially the concept behind the idea. Assuming (again) that hats = accessories, you are indeed stuck with the three-hat limit, but, you can choose which type of hat it is. It couldn't be said simpler. The hat limit would still remain 10, but with an even wider variety of combos and creativity. The system would function the same way if people chose 2 instead of 3 hats.
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#203419750Saturday, December 03, 2016 7:59 PM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
Kuroharu
#203420278Saturday, December 03, 2016 8:03 PM GMT

Support because if I can have non touching limbs, why cant I have multiple of the same type of accessory.
awesomegladpablo
#203420767Saturday, December 03, 2016 8:07 PM GMT

This is what I got from the beginning part of the post: "Oh, look, EVERYONE is posting on this subject. I have a great idea, why don't I make a post that is literally almost the same as the post that thousands of people have already made? That will surely get me lots of support and views!"
Junkful
#203421798Saturday, December 03, 2016 8:16 PM GMT

""Oh, look, EVERYONE is posting on this subject. I have a great idea, why don't I make a post that is literally almost the same as the post that thousands of people have already made? That will surely get me lots of support and views!"" You really have a lack of understanding, don't you? I'm not bothering to go into detail with this. What everyone wants is more hair; I'm trying to make the whole thing improve. I don't want more hair specifically.
Junkful
#203425994Saturday, December 03, 2016 8:58 PM GMT

Bump.