WaaaxJoin Date: 2011-03-15
Post Count: 9613 |
>Only quality win is maybe Colorado
>Scheduled Rutgers, Portland State and Idaho in their non conference
>Their one quality opponent, USC, ran all over them at their own home field
>Only 12-1 because Pac 12 is a horrible conference this year besides 1 or 2 teams
>Not much special about this team
|
|
|
you could make a case for neither clemson nor washington making it but i would keep washington in and take clemson out
Iᴛ ᴀɪɴᴛ ᴇᴀsʏ, ʙᴇɪɴɢ Cʜᴇᴇsᴇʏ. |
|
milanfanJoin Date: 2011-03-20
Post Count: 2120 |
Just give us someone to play in Atlanta b/c we don't ####### care if its Washington, Penn State, Michigan, idc. |
|
WaaaxJoin Date: 2011-03-15
Post Count: 9613 |
True, but ACC is much tougher than the Pac 12 this year so
Huge gap between Big Ten/SEC/ACC and Pac 12/Big 12
|
|
waifuSZNJoin Date: 2012-05-04
Post Count: 2577 |
Clemson at least beat LOU and FSU and VT, 3 good ranked teams (and they went to FSU) and also beat AUB week 1
Washington played nobody but USC and COLO and COLO really got lucky having a good season and ppl above em dropping, and got honestly humbled yesterday |
|
|
">Only quality win is maybe Colorado
>Scheduled Rutgers, Portland State and Idaho in their non conference
>Their one quality opponent, USC, ran all over them at their own home field
>Only 12-1 because Pac 12 is a horrible conference this year besides 1 or 2 teams
>Not much special about this team"
1) I'd consider Stanford, Utah, and Washington State as decent wins too
2) And? Alabama scheduled freaking Chattanooga, an FCS team. Ohio State scheduled Bowling Green and Tulsa. Clemson scheduled Troy and South Carolina State. UM scheduled Hawaii and UCF. Wisconsin scheduled Akron and Georgia State. Teams schedule soft opponents in non-conference all the time.
3) 13 points isn't "running all over them"
4) They're 12-1 because they are a good football team
5) Washington is a top 25 team in yards per game, and third in points per game in the entire FBS. They're also 10th in the FBS in points allowed per game. |
|
waifuSZNJoin Date: 2012-05-04
Post Count: 2577 |
ACC > pac12 |
|
|
for you fools saying they had no real opponents: they went 4-0 vs opponents ranked at game time:
44-6 over #7 Stanford (CR: 17)
31-24 over #17 Utah (CR: 20)
45-17 over #23 Washington State (CR: unranked)
41-10 over #9 Colorado (CR: 9)
now shut the hell up.
RIP Koolboy123, Oct. 1, 1992-Apr. 27, 2016 ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ |
|
waifuSZNJoin Date: 2012-05-04
Post Count: 2577 |
Wazzu played nobody
Utah is like 8-4
Colo and Stanford their only good wins and Stanford became an afterthought this ssn |
|
|
"ACC > pac12"
yeah, a conference with a 9-3 team making the title game is definitely better than a conference with two T10 teams in the title game. not only that, but the conference with one T10 team is better than the team with THREE T1O teams (will be two after this week though).
mhm, totally.
RIP Koolboy123, Oct. 1, 1992-Apr. 27, 2016 ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ |
|
waifuSZNJoin Date: 2012-05-04
Post Count: 2577 |
In level of difficulty? Yes, yes it is.
|
|
|
not to mention the ACC will only have one RANKED team after this, whereas the pac 12 will still have 5. "Utah went 8-4" they're still ranked, and two of those losses were to the teams in the ###### and both games were within a touchdown. RIP Koolboy123, Oct. 1, 1992-Apr. 27, 2016 ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ |
|
|
two of those losses were to teams in the T25 and both games were within a touchdown.*
"In level of difficulty? Yes, yes it is."
mind backing this up at all?
RIP Koolboy123, Oct. 1, 1992-Apr. 27, 2016 ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ |
|
WaaaxJoin Date: 2011-03-15
Post Count: 9613 |
"ACC will only have 1 ranked team"
So #12 FSU and #13 Louisville are just gonna magically drop out of the polls after not playing a game this weekend? Also I don't see why Virginia Tech would drop out of the poll considering they played a close game with a top 4 team
|
|
jimbobuckyTop 100 PosterJoin Date: 2008-06-01
Post Count: 71233 |
Haven't read a single post but...Washington deserves to be in lol, there's really no argument against it |
|
WaaaxJoin Date: 2011-03-15
Post Count: 9613 |
@jimbo read my original post
|
|
milanfanJoin Date: 2011-03-20
Post Count: 2120 |
Washington is a good team. Yea they have 1 loss but hey, they won the Pac-12 and big ranked wins in their conference.
|
|
|
bleh i meant 3.
"Also I don't see why Virginia Tech would drop out of the poll considering they played a close game with a top 4 team"
when you're two ranks into the polls you'll more often than not drop out. just how it usually goes, not saying they shouldn't stay in.
RIP Koolboy123, Oct. 1, 1992-Apr. 27, 2016 ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ |
|
jimbobuckyTop 100 PosterJoin Date: 2008-06-01
Post Count: 71233 |
">Only quality win is maybe Colorado
>Scheduled Rutgers, Portland State and Idaho in their non conference
>Their one quality opponent, USC, ran all over them at their own home field
>Only 12-1 because Pac 12 is a horrible conference this year besides 1 or 2 teams
>Not much special about this team"
They have more than one quality win, look at their schedule
Other top 4 teams also scheduled cupcakes
USC was not their only quality opponent
Pac 12 isn't a "horrible conference"
They have a very good QB, arguably the best receiver in the nation, and a fantastic defense |
|
|
stop over-complicating it
1. Alabama
2. Ohio State/Clemson
3. Ohio State/Clemson
4. Washington
Michigan ranked wins: 1
Penn State ranked wins: 2
Washington ranked wins: 4
Michigan is 10-2
Penn State is 11-2
Washington is 12-1
Loss to USC > Losses to Pittsburgh and Iowa
WASHINGTON DESERVES TO GET IN
|
|