of     1   

Iaptus
#204821151Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:13 AM GMT

idk id take China-Russia-India-UK
BIoodPatriot
#204821213Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:14 AM GMT

with what navy/air force are they going to transport troops to our shores with? we dominate the air and the sea by far, and there's absolutely no competition between us and any combination of countries.
Laedere
#204821233Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:14 AM GMT

india, china, and uk aren't much of a superpower
Saevor
#204821327Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:16 AM GMT

USA USA USA USA USA
eeoa
#204821377Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:16 AM GMT

USA
gamemastereric
#204821508Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:18 AM GMT

The war would drag on for a while and eventually get shot down by SJWs so a truce would be agreed upon | Ninjas. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=whqHqgEZmao
BIoodPatriot
#204821765Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:22 AM GMT

the US wouldnt be able to take any offensive no but it would certainly out-last the countries for the following reasons: china - completely reliant on trade, mainly on the US companies within their borders. once they're gone, their production for war is tanked already. india - they're not even military competent to begin with other than huge manpower reserves. they don't have a navy or an air force to even begin to think about participating in an invasion of the US. russia/UK - would be the US's only competitors in the long run. the US could however easily strangle their economies with 3-4 carrier fleets.
frosthawks
#204822077Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:26 AM GMT

so would I lol
MerkFreeksWolffe
#204822140Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:27 AM GMT

'Merica
gostriderthe2
#204822337Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:31 AM GMT

China could destory the US's Economy massively crippling production, jobs, and make utter chaos happen(Of course China would get massively hit as well), but then combining Russia, India, and the UK's military forces, yeah I'd say the US is pretty much beat. But we can't always predict war solely on statistics/opinions, it just doesn't work that way, so anything could happen.
gostriderthe2
#204822405Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:32 AM GMT

Also don't forget Nukes, so .3.
TimeBurnz
#204822464Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:32 AM GMT

the US wouldnt be able to take any offensive no but it would certainly out-last the countries for the following reasons: china - completely reliant on trade, mainly on the US companies within their borders. once they're gone, their production for war is tanked already. india - they're not even military competent to begin with other than huge manpower reserves. they don't have a navy or an air force to even begin to think about participating in an invasion of the US. russia/UK - would be the US's only competitors in the long run. the US could however easily strangle their economies with 3-4 carrier fleets.[2] @gost we have trump now so shhh |+1550 posts|Devin|yeet yeet|
gostriderthe2
#204822607Tuesday, December 20, 2016 3:35 AM GMT

Also I really don't get the "Who'd win a war thing" you can't really predict the outcome of war, russia could beat the us, or the us could beat russia, we won't really know just based on statistics and opinion, but I guess it is fun to speculate on who'd win I guess. Also imo, if countries did have another war, it'd just be a nuke battle, regardless who has the bigger military, if a country is able to get a few nukes on key areas/places auto rip

    of     1