of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

eeoa
#206126846Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:40 PM GMT

Raiding a dead clan doesn't really boost activity.
ClearPilot
#206127028Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:42 PM GMT

^ life is like a potato, it can grow anywhere
Heydude261
#206127033Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:42 PM GMT

SC is defending and able to defend multiple servers so there should be no real reason why they won't accept
eeoa
#206127091Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:43 PM GMT

From what I've heard SC can't defend a single server, though.
ShatteredQ
#206127114Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:43 PM GMT

"SC is defending and able to defend multiple servers so there should be no real reason why they won't accept " no they can't LOL SC can barely rally 10 when I was an HR just a few days ago, you all are really uninformed.
VicePrezLava
#206127135Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:43 PM GMT

"from what I've heard" this is the problem with c&g
Heydude261
#206127180Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:44 PM GMT

They defended like 4 servers last week and had no trouble defending today They're not really dead, just playing really dead
Seraphim_S
#206127185Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:44 PM GMT

Well I guess Precian was talking nonsense he said SC was alive and well. :/
ShatteredQ
#206127220Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:44 PM GMT

"just playing dead" this shows the average intelligence
Heydude261
#206127331Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:45 PM GMT

SURGE raided like 4 servers of SC the other week and to my knowledge defended them all though Shattered
ShatteredQ
#206127387Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:46 PM GMT

yes but it was the same people defending and it was 2 servers not four, we won one then lost the other to my knowledge.
Heydude261
#206127529Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:47 PM GMT

So they are defending right ok
spIashes
#206127542Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:48 PM GMT

its been the same people defending...
eeoa
#206127564Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:48 PM GMT

" "from what I've heard" this is the problem with c&g" I heard it from a raid leader that tried to raid SC and they couldn't get enough to defend.
Dhagandey
#206127582Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:48 PM GMT

And to my knowledge, not too long ago SC defended 3 servers.
eeoa
#206127623Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:48 PM GMT

Still how are the same 10 or so people going to defend from a massive invasion from RAT?
ShatteredQ
#206127663Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:49 PM GMT

Literally it's the same group of SC HRs defending lol, that doesn't make them active SQ is cool
Heydude261
#206127757Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:50 PM GMT

ok thank you for telling us that they're defending and able to defend, SQ
Heydude261
#206127802Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:50 PM GMT

WAR terms exalted O_O
VicePrezLava
#206127947Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:52 PM GMT

you're not getting the point exalted people like you need to be rid of c&g and be replaced with more intelligent ppl
eeoa
#206127969Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:52 PM GMT

"Servers going un-defended for 10 minutes will count as a win, and any servers will be shutdown (i.e RAT is raiding Briscald and SC doesn’t defend, all servers at Borealis/Sierra will be shutdown)" so the war terms will hand RAT free wins?
striketurtle
#206128027Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:52 PM GMT

And this is during winter break, when school starts back up we'll be dead again
eeoa
#206128029Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:52 PM GMT

"you're not getting the point exalted people like you need to be rid of c&g and be replaced with more intelligent ppl" what
Heydude261
#206128390Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:56 PM GMT

no war terms basically force SC to defend
eeoa
#206128485Sunday, January 01, 2017 11:57 PM GMT

Yes but do you really think the same 10 or so people are gonna defend all 30 raids RAT needs to win?

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right