|
"if u were in void during void vs vak u know he was a good leader"
If he was such a good leader then VOID wouldn't be in development for over a year now and a laughing stock of C&G |
|
|
Diastra, I never heard of you before |
|
|
|
me of course
have you seen my work with void? |
|
|
definitely not thecelvestian |
|
zman250Join Date: 2011-01-20
Post Count: 18410 |
"me of course
have you seen my work with void?"
_
lmao
|
|
|
l3oss is probably the most underrated leader on this game |
|
|
ForenzJoin Date: 2009-10-31
Post Count: 7481 |
Also VAK is only considered the most relevant in that genre because they're open to the other genres, their activities aren't restrained within their own genre
Other groups respect their identity to the letter and coordinate their activities in that manner |
|
WannaBetJoin Date: 2011-01-01
Post Count: 23607 |
There's no real answer to your question. The people that everyone generally supports are those that don't have much to do with groups (or at least anymore) and stray away from being very opinionated on the forums. Those would be people like Squidboi, Flammus, and Diesoft (though his popularity has been waning down in the past year).
Out of those who are still involved, there are ideologically divisive camps where people of the same camp would like one another. The spectrum is generally dictated by the level of support a person would have for the notion that clans are solely about warfare.
There are those who strongly support this notion, like Synoan and ISO.
There are those who are caught up somewhere in the middle, like Dystra and Seviro.
And then there are those who are against it, like Falsewarrior and I.
Just to create a little fun visual spectrum using the names of people others on here know, I would say that it would look something like:
Lily_____FalseWarrior____Myself___________Clock________Seviro___________Dystra______Vaktus_________________Sas_ISO
(further left, less support)
That's just a rough take on how I see it.
|
|
|
polymorphic, seviro, pragmatist
get off my subforum |
|
|
I don't mind wars but people are just stupid babbys about it now so it's more fun to do internal events |
|
|
CyxeJoin Date: 2012-08-25
Post Count: 3131 |
Thank you WannaBet, your post made alot of sense.
I do agree with Seviro, about clans being not solely based about warfare.
I have very good leadership skills in my opinion, but I am not the greatest fighter.
Not that that means anything.
The intent of this thread is to see who the community thinks are the greatest leaders, but that is not accurate whatsoever.
I also agree l3oss is very underrated. Resade was one of my best clan experiences thanks to him and Jay.
|
|
CyxeJoin Date: 2012-08-25
Post Count: 3131 |
The problem with wars these days is the cheating, it's unavoidable in most cases which is sad.
You can always solve that with banning, or exiling members, but now the majority of the cheating within wars comes from, or is supported directly from the leader themselves. |
|
|
CyxeJoin Date: 2012-08-25
Post Count: 3131 |
That's true, but there also are the clans who want to war legitimately, and that ruins the experience for them. |
|
|
|
Vaktus is probably the most respected, lets be real here. Most people don't dislike Vaktus, but only those under him.
|
|
|