of     1   

Tottenham_Hotspur
#207530075Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:08 AM GMT

because apprently TFC devs think this is fair when in reality it's super raider sided So domination round, starts out neutral, but TFC needs 1.2k points to win and raiders need 1k points to win It's already a strech to have domination with equal points to win, I mean it's so much easier to get 1k points domination style with a number advantage than hold a term for 1200 seconds He thinks that it's fair because we're getting a gun system like A2 (guns save between servers) but that applies for both teams (also guns are gonna be made so they're fairly even) and spawns are equal IMO it should be like 1k for TFC and 1.2k for raiders, not the other way around
PharaohOfEgypt117
#207530176Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:10 AM GMT

well it's new and interesting let's just see how it works out yanno
big_sean
#207530253Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:11 AM GMT

Experiment with it before making hasty decisions Try it both ways
Tottenham_Hotspur
#207530259Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:11 AM GMT

ya it's super interesting but i feel like raiders would win a nice 75% of the raids since TFC legit needs to be better with a number disadvantage
ImperialOutcast
#207530384Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:13 AM GMT

I-i-i-i-i-i It's already been voted 4-1, we're doing it my way m8... I'm a master strategist, we got this.
Tottenham_Hotspur
#207530514Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:14 AM GMT

we voted 4-1 on the system not to make it so raiders have an easier objective than defenders
ImperialOutcast
#207530577Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:15 AM GMT

...
PharaohOfEgypt117
#207531175Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:24 AM GMT

we really only have to hold more than half of the points, it won't be a big deal, they'll be stretched thin, so would we, it'll be a tough fort to raid would be better if we made it even tho
Tottenham_Hotspur
#207531299Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:26 AM GMT

pharoh someone has to win in this fort since only tfc or raiders can hold points they get number advantage and they need less points to win
DominusRobloxia
#207531523Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:29 AM GMT

"Raiders get number advantage" You have 2k members. Use them "Raiders get less points to win" So you want to make it unfair by increasing their points rather than improving your defences via practice?
promemeazine
#207531571Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:30 AM GMT

rat has 200k members why cant u guys rally atleast 100k???
Desorte
#207531636Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:31 AM GMT

release then change if people complain
DominusRobloxia
#207531695Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:32 AM GMT

tbh I'm not even maiming RAT, just for the infocenter points Other than that, RAT is very active even without a war.
PharaohOfEgypt117
#207532409Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:43 AM GMT

i see where you're coming at, we get flooded when we have the bare minimum, something like that, right? if it becomes a huge problem, we could try to fix it by increasing the tfc limit to raid, or increase the server size should just be even points tho, dunno why they let the raiders have less points to win
DominusRobloxia
#207532498Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:44 AM GMT

OE JUSR HAVE THE RAID LEADERS MESSAGE YOU THAT THEYRE GOING TO RAID...
Desorte
#207532620Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:46 AM GMT

########################
Kiritsugu
#207532706Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:47 AM GMT

the forest clan is real? i thought it was a meme O.o nani sore? 🐙 ★—_— ♠ 🔫
Tottenham_Hotspur
#207533083Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:52 AM GMT

""Raiders get number advantage" You have 2k members. Use them "Raiders get less points to win" So you want to make it unfair by increasing their points rather than improving your defences via practice?"" uhh are you dumb? Servers have limited space and how would we make it unfair? The raiders have easier objectives than us.

    of     1