Senate Vote on Power Defense Organization Establishment

Join Date: 2015-05-17
Post Count: 600

#207674656Friday, January 20, 2017 3:20 AM GMT

The bill can be found here: https://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=207631986 The vote ends in 24 consecutive hours. The vote may be closed early if a majority is reached. Vote on this thread.

Apolloqi

Join Date: 2013-12-08
Post Count: 783

#207675188Friday, January 20, 2017 3:26 AM GMT

Aye. I encourage all other Senators and House of Reps to pass this bill. This will allow our international community to finally be able to truly spread military support that is reliable and constant. We need to better our military stance within the int'll community. And this bill would exactly do this.

Isner

Join Date: 2008-02-04
Post Count: 14138

#207676335Friday, January 20, 2017 3:40 AM GMT

Nay. I would vote Nay on this a thousand times over. Not only does this form a international organization under our nation, which has a thousand issues associated with it, it gives Congress NO power over war, but instead this "Power Defense Organization" and it's committee members. On top of all that, we do not even control this council, and are forced to pledge troops even if we may disagree with the cause. Absolutely not. This should be a separate organization if anything, but definitely not under the United States. - Senator Isner

WillMcAvoy

Join Date: 2010-05-29
Post Count: 932

#207676576Friday, January 20, 2017 3:43 AM GMT

Nay, nay, nay. I thought Plutocrats were anti-globalism. Senator Jeff Sessions

blastatack

Join Date: 2010-06-12
Post Count: 871

#207677465Friday, January 20, 2017 3:54 AM GMT

nay : 31,416

Apolloqi

Join Date: 2013-12-08
Post Count: 783

#207677869Friday, January 20, 2017 3:59 AM GMT

See this is why no one likes Republicans and they are dying. You all assume too much which are all lies. Please tell me where this bill takes away Congresses power? It doesn't even state that. This is very similar to the United Nations, but instead works on bettering our military support. Claiming that this bill will strip our powers away is idiotic Why would I do that, even when I'm on Congress myself. Makes no sense. If this is the only thing you have against this then your opinions are quite honestly sad. Our powers aren't taken away. This only benefits us by having an organized military international council. We need military support; reliable at least. Not ify support.

Isner

Join Date: 2008-02-04
Post Count: 14138

#207678590Friday, January 20, 2017 4:08 AM GMT

Your bill claims that if the council decides to go to war, then we, by contract, are also required to go to war. When I asked for clarification on this on Discord, you stated we would still "vote so our Ambassador could cast the vote in our place". That does NOT remedy this situation. If our Ambassador votes no, under your bill we still have to go to war with troops, if the majority vote yes. I'm not in the habit of letting 18 other nations decide our military strategy. No thanks.