chevron_leftchevron_leftchevron_left
    of     2   

ghostbleed
#208067884Monday, January 23, 2017 10:56 PM GMT

Signed
AcidRaps
#208067907Monday, January 23, 2017 10:57 PM GMT

Signed, AcidRaps
yosebleed
#208068081Monday, January 23, 2017 10:59 PM GMT

X
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#208068300Monday, January 23, 2017 11:01 PM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
SurpriseParty
#208068307Monday, January 23, 2017 11:01 PM GMT

2nq is by far one of the most active judges on the federal court - he last took a case four days ago and we have judges who go MONTHS without taking a case and you guys call for the impeachment of 2nq? sorry but, he won't be being impeached over a mere four days of 'inactivity' (assuming he hasn't done anything with mythicone v. bank of america, which he has) in all honesty, i don't think that it's a coincidence technozo calls for his impeachment after he takes a case against bank of america (notice how technozo is an advisor in boa?) pathetic, you guys don't even know what you're doing and this is not happening - i promise you. tl;dr he last took a case 4 days ago when we have judges who havent done anything for months - call for the impeachment of someone else thanks.
Idiotic_Leader
#208068472Monday, January 23, 2017 11:03 PM GMT

@surpriseparty he's made 2 shouts in his entire history in NUSA How is that being an "active" federal judge?
SurpriseParty
#208068748Monday, January 23, 2017 11:07 PM GMT

@idiotic_leader (the name actually suits you now that i think about it) activity isn't determined through audit logs for federal and supreme court justices - for example, half the supreme court has rarely used the shout and never uses it, but are they inactive? no, because they vote and are active on the supreme court >TRELLOCOURT PROCESS TRELLO< (which is where the case distribution is done, etc.) - he last took a case FOUR days ago and we have judges who haven't taken one for MONTHS and you #### ### inactive? like i said, pathetic that technozo calls for this right after he takes a case against boa and tech is an advisor in boa - i see an issue here.
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#208068865Monday, January 23, 2017 11:08 PM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
jatinxyz
#208069450Monday, January 23, 2017 11:15 PM GMT

I see a conflict of interest here...
jerel303
#208070147Monday, January 23, 2017 11:22 PM GMT

Signed
TwoPugs
#208070686Monday, January 23, 2017 11:28 PM GMT

signed signed twopugs,,,,,,the greatest pug ever
Convolution
#208071802Monday, January 23, 2017 11:42 PM GMT

i shoot i forgot about that account
DavidBakyl
#208071900Monday, January 23, 2017 11:43 PM GMT

Yeah honestly, I doubt even half of you work with/in the same department as him. That's like me saying oh I think Night's inactive lets fire him. Tbh, y'all should focus on yourselves cause from what I see 2nq is pretty active.
UsSpecialOps
#208072719Monday, January 23, 2017 11:54 PM GMT

Signed We need to rid of all incompetent, inactive government officials. They will be what hinders our ability to thrive as a stable, strong nation. ~UsSpecialOps
Carking007
#208073024Monday, January 23, 2017 11:57 PM GMT

no, hes active ❕ Newbie123Pg/MyPassIsKitty21/daniday123 ❕ Twitter: 📧TRUE_TEXAN_ ❕ 💖 JESUS LOVES YOU 💖 ❕
Convolution
#208073773Tuesday, January 24, 2017 12:07 AM GMT

isnt it obvious that hes an alt
SurpriseParty
#208074060Tuesday, January 24, 2017 12:11 AM GMT

@convolution as probably the only opposition to the democrats - i can assure you if i thought 2nq was an alt he wouldnt have passed senate (plutocrats) nonetheless been nominated by the president (democrats) so unless he's an alt used by both sides (highly doubtful considering demos and plutos r like complete opposition to one another, and even then i can tell u it doesnt happen) then he isnt an alt dont judge based off appearance - he's actually really smart
KOTwarrior
#208074574Tuesday, January 24, 2017 12:17 AM GMT

Honestly, I'm really quite disappointed in each and every one of you who signed this petition; there truly is only one word to describe your actions here: ignorance. A judge's activity isn't dependent on their shouts, but on their case completion, and let me tell you: the Honorable Federal Judge 2NQ is one of roughly five judges (perhaps less) of the Federal Court who actively complete cases. Since his appointment slightly under two months ago, Judge 2NQ has completed fifteen separate cases, and taken up roughly twenty. As many of your are quite ill-informed, might I remind you that several (most) of the judges currently serving have held office for upwards of half a year and have not completed even half that number of cases *throughout their entire tenure.* So no, he is not inactive, and in reality, he is one of, if not the, most active judges presently serving on the Federal Court. I would wholeheartedly support the impeachment of an inactive judge (although I believe that activity in the lower courts is better served by actual reform and not merely temporary impeach-and-replace solutions), but really, you need to actually take some due diligence before bringing things up like this, it really just makes you look stupid. Signed, Chief Justice Holmes, Jr.
spyagent388
#208092236Tuesday, January 24, 2017 3:51 AM GMT

SIGNED
Carking007
#208098445Tuesday, January 24, 2017 5:12 AM GMT

technozo now regrets this ❕ Newbie123Pg/MyPassIsKitty21/daniday123 ❕ Twitter: 📧TRUE_TEXAN_ ❕ 💖 JESUS LOVES YOU 💖 ❕
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#208148548Wednesday, January 25, 2017 1:09 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]

chevron_leftchevron_leftchevron_left
    of     2