of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

Zammy67rocks5
#210142473Sunday, February 19, 2017 8:49 PM GMT

I, zammy67rocks5, am excited to announce myself as a candidate for a Class 3 Senate seat in NUSA. SPEECH: I may seem inexperienced to many of you, which is understandable, but I do have some experience, having previously been a Vice President of Bosnia and Herzegovina. I am running in this campaign for one simple reason: People with foreign policy experience are needed to keep our country safe and running. And I know I have that experience needed. As Senator, I will support all efforts to end the current war with the UK which I feel is a completely unnecessary war that is for petty reasons and not only doesn't protect NUSA, it only puts us in more danger. We need to cut down on these type of wars. On top of foreign policy, these three issues are also important for me: -Holding every government official accountable as they should always be working on behalf of th###eople. -Creating more government and private sector jobs to boost the economy. -Voting reform. Approval voting needs to replace first past the post as our voting system. Voters should be able to choose all candidates they like, not have to tactically vote, and candidates should have to be elected over 50% of voters. I believe this will increase voting turnout in all elections if implemented. Thank you for taking your time in reading this speech, and I hope you will consider signing this petition and also voting for me in ### general election. Zammy67rocks5 NUSA Senate Candidate
AnimatedDannyo
#210142572Sunday, February 19, 2017 8:50 PM GMT

Signed! ᗩᘉᓰᗰᗩ☂ᕮↁᗪᗩᘉᘉϒ〇
TEXANNATI0NALIST
#210143924Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:03 PM GMT

you didnt got endorsed by animated LOL ill beat u up 👊👊👊
Zammy67rocks5
#210144298Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:06 PM GMT

considering he signed this petition...
AnimatedDannyo
#210144568Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:09 PM GMT

wow people are pretty petty so let me reword... Signed and endorsed!! ᗩᘉᓰᗰᗩ☂ᕮↁᗪᗩᘉᘉϒ〇
Hugo_Banzer
#210144626Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:09 PM GMT

signing =/= endorsing General Secretary of the Socialist Party, Roberto
Hugo_Banzer
#210144659Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:10 PM GMT

nvm General Secretary of ### Socialist Party, Roberto
TEXANNATI0NALIST
#210144739Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:10 PM GMT

bc i feel like arguing "As Senator, I will support all efforts to end ### current war with ### UK which I feel is a completely unnecessary war that is for petty reasons and not only doesn't protect NUSA, it only puts us in more danger. We need to cut down on these type of wars." do you even know why we're fighting, UK has been pushing us around, wars are fun anyways "Holding every government official accountable as they should always be working on behalf of th###eople." how "Creating more government and private sector jobs to boost the economy." so more useless government agencies? "Voting reform. Approval voting needs to replace first past the post as our voting system. Voters should be able to choose all candidates they like, not have to tactically vote, and candidates should have to be elected over 50% of voters. I believe this will increase voting turnout in all elections if implemented." oh are there so many things wrong with this 1. making voters having the option to vote as however many candidates they want to will rig elections 2. it's going to practically be impossible for candidates to win if you're going to implement a system that they need to get over 50% ill beat u up 👊👊👊
AnimatedDannyo
#210145501Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:17 PM GMT

^ there was so much ignorance in this post but i don't care enough to say anything lol ᗩᘉᓰᗰᗩ☂ᕮↁᗪᗩᘉᘉϒ〇
TEXANNATI0NALIST
#210145635Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:18 PM GMT

youre only signing his thread just because he's running as an independent ill beat u up 👊👊👊
Zammy67rocks5
#210145668Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:19 PM GMT

"do you even know why we're fighting, UK has been pushing us around, wars are fun anyways" I am very well aware of why we're fighting. It's because the ###tocrats wanted Hawaii back for no reason but to create controversy. "how" Voicing any displeasure I have is quite important. "so more useless government agencies?" Why can't we create jobs within already functioning government agencies? Also, private sector jobs are a part of the ###n so it won't require creating "useless government agencies" "1. making voters having the option to vote as however many candidates they want to will rig elections" No it won't. People will still be only able to vote once. "2. it's going to practically be impossible for candidates to win if you're going to implement a system that they need to get over 50%" Approval voting would make it easier to get over 50% because you can vote for more than one candidate. It's very difficult to get over 50% right now because ### current system only lets you pick one and unless there's only one candidate people actually want like in ### previous presidental election, that won't happen.
TEXANNATI0NALIST
#210146739Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:29 PM GMT

"I am very well aware of why we're fighting. It's because the ###tocrats wanted Hawaii back for no reason but to create controversy." not really, UK has been very undemocratic and ruthless so someone had to whoop them "Voicing any displeasure I have is quite important." u didnt answer my question "Why can't we create jobs within already functioning government agencies? Also, private sector jobs are a part of the ###n so it won't require creating "useless government agencies"" bc we dont need a lot of govt jobs, you also shouldve said "promoting more private sector jobs" instead of "creating them" "No it won't. People will still be only able to vote once." you said "Voters should be able to choose all candidates they like" don't act dumb "Approval voting would make it easier to get over 50% because you can vote for more than one candidate. It's very difficult to get over 50% right now because ### current system only lets you pick one and unless there's only one candidate people actually want like in ### previous presidental election, that won't happen." do you even know what youre saying? here's an example theres 3 candidates, candidate a, candidate b, and candidates c you can vote for all 3 only 2 will get in the most equal amount they each get is 33.33% you cant get over 100% do the math ill beat u up 👊👊👊
Zammy67rocks5
#210147692Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:39 PM GMT

"not really, UK has been very undemocratic and ruthless so someone had to whoop them" lmao. This was about Hawaii and you know it. "u didnt answer my question" Yes I did. "you also shouldve said "promoting more private sector jobs" instead of "creating them"" Fair enough. Similar meaning anyway. "you said "Voters should be able to choose all candidates they like" don't act dumb" You'#####y get one vote but you'#####t vote for one or more. Actually research how approval voting works before you talk about it. "theres 3 candidates, candidate a, candidate b, and candidates c you can vote for all 3 only 2 will get in the ###t equal amount they each get is 33.33% you cant get over 100% do the ###h" Wrong. This is ignorant of how approval voting works. Let's say there's 3 candidates with 100 people. 60 are Candidate A fans, 40 are Candidate B fans. Let's say a Candidate C enters the race, and runs on similar positions to Candidate A. He/she takes 25 of Candidate A voters. Candidate A, despite having a huge majority of people liking him/her, loses because our current system, plurality voting, lets you vote only for a single candidate: Candidate A - 35 votes Candidate B - 40 votes Candidate C - 25 votes In approval voting, sums can go over 100% because you vote for more than one candidate if you'd like. It'd end up like this then: Candidate A - 60% approval Candidate B - 40% approval Candidate C - 25% approval
Zammy67rocks5
#210147806Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:40 PM GMT

Sum of ### vote share between all 3 candidates. No candidate can go over 100% of course still.
TEXANNATI0NALIST
#210148329Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:46 PM GMT

@zammy "lmao. This was about Hawaii and you know it." like i said theres many reasons "Yes I did." all you said was "Voicing any displeasure I have is quite important." you didnt answer ## question that i asked you "Candidate A, despite having a huge majority of people liking him/her, loses because our current system, plurality voting, lets you vote only for a single candidate:" candidate A will still win bc i said only 2 candidates will get in "In approval voting, sums can go over 100% because you vote for more than one candidate if ##### like. It'd end up like this then:" then whats going to be ### ##### ## ### sum share of ### votes? there needs to be a limit unless 1% = 1 vote which will be a really stupid system by ### 100% i meant ### sum share of ### vote btw ill beat u up 👊👊👊
AnimatedDannyo
#210148404Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:47 PM GMT

"youre only signing his thread just because he's running as an independent" i'm a justice do you think i care about political parties. zammy is my friend and i know he has the right ideas so yes i do support him to get elected. also don't make a fool of yourself and educate yourself on different polling systems; just because you don't know how they work does not mean they don't exist. you're criticizing him for political reasons not because of his policies; try again. ᗩᘉᓰᗰᗩ☂ᕮↁᗪᗩᘉᘉϒ〇
yosebleed
#210149200Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:56 PM GMT

signed justice yosemite
TEXANNATI0NALIST
#210149209Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:56 PM GMT

"zammy is ## friend and i know he has ### right ideas" lol did u even read thoroughly "also don't make a fool of yourself and educate yourself on different polling systems; just because you don't know how they work does not mean they don't exist" ik they exist i just think theyre really stupid and unnecessary ever thought of that "you're criticizing him for political reasons not because of his policies; try again." did u even read all of ### arguments, i only argue with ppl who's policies are really dumb no matter which party they are ill beat u up 👊👊👊
nastyeddie
#210149343Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:57 PM GMT

signed
Zammy67rocks5
#210149523Sunday, February 19, 2017 9:59 PM GMT

"theyre really stupid" that's what first past the post is.
AnimatedDannyo
#210149960Sunday, February 19, 2017 10:05 PM GMT

"i just think theyre really stupid and unnecessary ever thought of that" ignorance is bliss done posting here lol ᗩᘉᓰᗰᗩ☂ᕮↁᗪᗩᘉᘉϒ〇
TEXANNATI0NALIST
#210150005Sunday, February 19, 2017 10:06 PM GMT

you mean the last post or the last post made by me? lmao ill beat u up 👊👊👊
TEXANNATI0NALIST
#210150113Sunday, February 19, 2017 10:07 PM GMT

@animated >when youre trying to sound smart ill beat u up 👊👊👊
Zammy67rocks5
#210150116Sunday, February 19, 2017 10:07 PM GMT

First past ### post is what the current voting system is called and I describe it as stupid because it is.
TEXANNATI0NALIST
#210150250Sunday, February 19, 2017 10:09 PM GMT

sorry i thought you were talking about the posts, my apologies ill beat u up 👊👊👊

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right