|
The following constitutional ammendments are now open for voting. A 2/3rds majority is required for the following legislation to pass.
1: https://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=211948355
2: https://forum.roblox.com/Forum/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=211949162
Please enter your votes in the way shown down below:
1: [your vote]
2: [your vote]
-Luke Hefner, PPT. |
|
|
1: nay
2: nay
theyre both horrible bills that should fail automatically
ill beat u up 👊👊👊 |
|
|
|
1. nay, the current system for passing/presenting a new constitution is perfectly fine and doesn't need to be amended; we have the permission factor there for a reason.
2. nay: while i'm in favor of getting rid of presidential appointments, a special election is most certainly not the way to go about doing it.
two constitutional amendments as drastically-changing as these are should've been discussed with the entirety of congress before trying to present them so that we could have addressed our concerns beforehand |
|
|
TwitteredJoin Date: 2015-01-01
Post Count: 222 |
Nay to both of them per Senator Party.
Karl Rove [ISO-CA] |
|
|
|
nay to both NOW NOW NOW!!! |
|
|
|
Nay. It needs to be deliberately difficult to have a new constitution, and different options are provided to minimize chances of political sabotage.
Nay. While I can agree to remove presidential appointments, its implausible to have special elections every time a senator resigns. I would probably keep a ranked list from that class of how many votes candidates got and go from there. |
|
|
both failed
ill beat u up 👊👊👊 |
|
prevbloxJoin Date: 2012-05-05
Post Count: 1056 |
1. Nay: The Constitution is the law of the land; it should be immensely difficult to pass as it's such a grounding source of all law and legislation.
2. Nay: It seems like we'd be over-complicating matters with this amendment; if deemed necessary, we can always vote for an expulsion of senators, appointed or not, if they perform with, "disorderly behavior" [Constitution Article I, Section 5]. |
|
|
|
1-Nay
2-Nay
Signed, Senator Lordsights |
|
|
you fool, all constitutional amendments are meant to go through the SJC first (unless some moron didnt add it)
~mama bennett |
|
|
but yeah since i doubt you're going to do anything about it, nay to both
~mama bennett |
|
HarkologyJoin Date: 2011-07-12
Post Count: 190 |
1: nay
2: nay
both bad |
|
ApolloqiJoin Date: 2013-12-08
Post Count: 783 |
thee r suppose to go through sjc first then vote.... someone doesnt know procedures hmm? |
|