|
60 games in the USA, 10 each in Mexico and Canada.
Should probably be more like 40-26-14 or something along those lines TBH, Mexico should be able to host plenty more and the USA shouldn't get to host so many.
"'Live Laugh Logaids' - Worst Siggy Ever 2017" - ebenton -- RIP Koolboy123, Oct. 1, 1992-Apr. 27, 2016 ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ |
|
|
|
THEY BETTER HAVE AT LEAST ONE GAME IN EDMONTON |
|
123yonndTop 100 PosterJoin Date: 2008-07-19
Post Count: 66637 |
I don't see why USA cant just host by themselves.
They have plenty of stadiums to host the event with much better facilities. I would hate going through border as a middle eastern traveling fan several times during the tournament. |
|
EbbysfaceJoin Date: 2013-05-28
Post Count: 350 |
2 reasons Donny
1. It lessens the burden on the U.S.
2. Fifa no like U.S. |
|
123yonndTop 100 PosterJoin Date: 2008-07-19
Post Count: 66637 |
they hate the U.S because they got caught with corruption. if they weren't corrupt we wouldn't have a problem. |
|
hancock3Join Date: 2008-08-22
Post Count: 7809 |
Portugal better play in USA somewhere in northeast! |
|
|
Honestly, if there's a game in Edmonton, I'm going.
I don't care if it's a matchup I'd hate like Sweden-Russia. I'd still go. |
|
xjake99Join Date: 2010-10-09
Post Count: 6881 |
so does all 3 teams get auto bids ? |
|
|
40-26-14 sounds more fair tbh |
|
|
Why not have a world cup in Dubai?
Argentina and China are also good options. |
|
123yonndTop 100 PosterJoin Date: 2008-07-19
Post Count: 66637 |
because you cant have a world cup in the same continent for two straight world cups. |
|
|
I think that Argentina or Mexico should host the 2026 WC. |
|
123yonndTop 100 PosterJoin Date: 2008-07-19
Post Count: 66637 |
neither argentina or mexico have the current infrastructure to host a world cup right now, and they are not willing to spend the money on renovations and building. |
|
|
The Emirates (Dubai/Abu Dhabi/others) wouldn't be nearly as bad of a host as Qatar but it's still an extremely hot place and isn't exactly known to have a good human rights record. |
|
|
Speaking of tiny gulf states hosting the World Cup,
If co-hosting bids like North America 2026 and a Pan-European Euro 2020 are allowed, then why not just have a World Cup across the entire Arab Gulf instead of just Qatar where they've literally had to build an entire brand new city to accommodate the tournament? |
|
|
Im thinking Iceland or the UK.
Iceland deserve to host in my opinion especially after the incredible performance in the Euro's. |
|
|
"Iceland deserve to host in my opinion"
Yeah, a country of 350,000 people should totally host a world cup. /s |
|
|
Uruguay hosted the first world cup and had a population of 3.5 million. (and won it)
So why not Iceland? |
|
123yonndTop 100 PosterJoin Date: 2008-07-19
Post Count: 66637 |
because the first world cup was barely a fraction as big as the world cup is right now. also iceland doesnt have ANY stadiums that meet the world cup minimum capacity. |
|
|
little do they know Kazakhstan is planning to bid |
|
|
Maybe 2030 WC can be in North Korea :)
They have the biggest stadium in the world.
Rungrado 1st of May Stadium with a capacity of 114,000. |
|
|
The Rungrado Stadium's capacity is closer to 150,000 than 114,000. |
|