of     1   

MICHEAL1988351
#215810437Tuesday, May 02, 2017 9:47 PM GMT

It is annoying when you are developing a game which contains a ton of UI, and you realize you need an entire extra image, because the image you are working with will need to be flipped horizontally (or vertically) throughout some part of your game. Typically for a 2d UI (ImageLabel, or ImageButton), you would have to go back to your computer and flip the image horizontally or vertically respectfully using your image editing software, then upload this new flipped image to ROBLOX, simply because the GuiObject.Rotation property does not exactly handle Image flips. As a suggestion to get around the hassle of this perhaps ROBLOX could add a method to any class which contains a type Content property that would render the Content image pixels in reverse of what they normally are, thus flipping the image. (or instead there could be a method inside Content [Content:method()], kind of like [CFrame:lerp()]; which would do the same thing) Lastly, the method could have two overloads, one overload would take a parameter that enables or disables flip rendering of the Content, and the other overload would take a parameter possibly being a future Enum, determining whether to vertically flip the image, horizontally flip the image or both; for example say that there was Enum.ContentFlipType, which contained 0:Horizontal, 1:Vertical, 2:Inverse. (Inverse being Horizontal and Vertical) An example of this would probably look like ImageLable.Image:Flip(true); ImageLabel.Image:Flip(Enum.ContentFlipType.Inverse); making it extremely easy to flip image content in your game via code. I appreciate those who took the time to read this, consider it, and/or constructively criticize it. Personally it would make me more than ecstatic if ROBLOX decided to implement this idea.
MICHEAL1988351
#215829481Wednesday, May 03, 2017 2:43 AM GMT

Bump
asValkyria
#215829558Wednesday, May 03, 2017 2:44 AM GMT

tl;dr pls
MICHEAL1988351
#215829755Wednesday, May 03, 2017 2:48 AM GMT

### I'm sorry to hear that. I didn't think of my suggestion as being to long to read though.
asValkyria
#215829919Wednesday, May 03, 2017 2:50 AM GMT

ok i read it op sorry :( i support this
MICHEAL1988351
#215855774Wednesday, May 03, 2017 3:59 PM GMT

thanks :)
iChairman
#215855926Wednesday, May 03, 2017 4:02 PM GMT

support
MICHEAL1988351
#215858967Wednesday, May 03, 2017 5:07 PM GMT

thanks for support!
MICHEAL1988351
#215863379Wednesday, May 03, 2017 6:46 PM GMT

blump
Borsy
#215867678Wednesday, May 03, 2017 8:16 PM GMT

no i love having to use 4 separate images for the exact same thing but flipped and i also love having to clone the same image to make a looping image for the entire screen instead of having an image "looped" property. much more efficient
XxSWxX
#215867845Wednesday, May 03, 2017 8:19 PM GMT

yes
chatowillwin
#215870773Wednesday, May 03, 2017 9:07 PM GMT

Support!
MICHEAL1988351
#215875216Wednesday, May 03, 2017 10:12 PM GMT

thank you all!
MICHEAL1988351
#215881618Wednesday, May 03, 2017 11:41 PM GMT

bumpity
MICHEAL1988351
#215895991Thursday, May 04, 2017 3:39 AM GMT

bump
heerpdeerp
#215896026Thursday, May 04, 2017 3:40 AM GMT

sure signature
Anthonychi
#215896358Thursday, May 04, 2017 3:48 AM GMT

support
MICHEAL1988351
#215914585Thursday, May 04, 2017 3:21 PM GMT

thank you all for supporting! buuummmppp
iChairman
#215915989Thursday, May 04, 2017 3:50 PM GMT

hey look another thread i posted on before
MICHEAL1988351
#215929764Thursday, May 04, 2017 8:53 PM GMT

buwuummmpppp
MICHEAL1988351
#215999217Saturday, May 06, 2017 12:29 AM GMT

nump
DragonOfWar900
#216000680Saturday, May 06, 2017 12:57 AM GMT

MICHEAL1988351
#216032024Saturday, May 06, 2017 1:19 PM GMT

thanks everyone for supporting! bump
MICHEAL1988351
#216066079Saturday, May 06, 2017 9:19 PM GMT

bum,p
MICHEAL1988351
#216081528Sunday, May 07, 2017 1:04 AM GMT

numump

    of     1