chevron_leftchevron_leftchevron_left
    of     3   

UnderEstimating
#216492150Friday, May 12, 2017 9:02 PM GMT

name clans pls and i mean if you're limited to just one tactic its not fun either sniff
theNBK
#216492364Friday, May 12, 2017 9:06 PM GMT

We were going to declare war on Sunday, and some Vaktovians knew about it so VAK just declared war before us so they can believe that they have some sort of leverage over us.
Brutecus
#216492545Friday, May 12, 2017 9:09 PM GMT

Oh yeah we declared war just to aggravate you on being first. Focus on what CSP is going to do instead of just wining. Be a god damn leader already.
HateHouse
#216492609Friday, May 12, 2017 9:10 PM GMT

Brutecus, your bait is really bad.
Weaponizing
#216492655Friday, May 12, 2017 9:10 PM GMT

seems like vak declared war first so that they could give their demands and add a no negotiation factor coupled with the average "if you dont accept this you're a coward" implication
UnderEstimating
#216492673Friday, May 12, 2017 9:11 PM GMT

i remember that one time we played apoc together nbk how your internet randomly spikes and it'd be like you were lagswitching but you werent and you moved from a to b was fun miss those days now its all toxicity and arguments :(
Brutecus
#216492826Friday, May 12, 2017 9:13 PM GMT

Weaponizing, VAK has been heavily associated with the image of stalled negotiations. You're saying us not wanting to do that was for only our benefit? We want to fight already. CSP has been attacking us for months and suddenly they don't want a symmetrical, and fair battlefield.
c4spian
#216492933Friday, May 12, 2017 9:15 PM GMT

it's the endurance war we don't want AKA we can't do anything even though we'll stomp you in win count
Weaponizing
#216492976Friday, May 12, 2017 9:15 PM GMT

Weaponizing, VAK has been heavily associated with the image of stalled negotiations. You're saying us not wanting to do that was for only our benefit? We want to fight already. CSP has been attacking us for months and suddenly they don't want a symmetrical, and fair battlefield. --- what guns will be used who will have administrative powers at the actual battlegrounds will there be a mediator will both sides get a copy etc
Brutecus
#216493054Friday, May 12, 2017 9:16 PM GMT

Again, you believe that is only for our benefit. What if we 100-0 you at Varcia and you just not to pull out? You know in your mind that CSP can't do this because they don't have the balls to keep fighting.
spongixon
#216493137Friday, May 12, 2017 9:18 PM GMT

they dont want to accept the war cause they know their clan will collapse
Brutecus
#216493177Friday, May 12, 2017 9:18 PM GMT

Weaponizing, guns that CSP is heavily trained in. Much more than or equal to their own guns. For the other three, I wouldn't know but I wouldn't deny it either.
HateHouse
#216493247Friday, May 12, 2017 9:19 PM GMT

Good bait Spongi.
Brutecus
#216493269Friday, May 12, 2017 9:20 PM GMT

Plus we always gave admin to the leader of the opposing during the NFC war.
c4spian
#216493273Friday, May 12, 2017 9:20 PM GMT

Again, you believe that is only for our benefit. What if we 100-0 you at Varcia and you just not to pull out? You know in your mind that CSP can't do this because they don't have the balls to keep fighting. --- if you 100-0 us at varcia and we don't surrender, that's the exact same thing lol, no winner
Weaponizing
#216493419Friday, May 12, 2017 9:22 PM GMT

Again, you believe that is only for our benefit. What if we 100-0 you at Varcia and you just not to pull out? You know in your mind that CSP can't do this because they don't have the balls to keep fighting. --- answer the questions and because vak in the past has used wins in endurance wars to claim victory and then quit you can also say that vak doesn't have the balls to fight at the actual bases so they need to rely on fair fights fair fights have never proved anything in the clan world it's always the combination of unfair and fair things coupled with the performance of clans experiencing it that determine clan strength
Atomicwaldo
#216493478Friday, May 12, 2017 9:23 PM GMT

Brutecus thought that the csp guns do more damage lol idiot
Weaponizing
#216493553Friday, May 12, 2017 9:24 PM GMT

ok u did answer thanks
Brutecus
#216493634Friday, May 12, 2017 9:26 PM GMT

Atomic, when did I say that? I was testing the guns with a CSP and it was an equal amount of shots to kill for both sides.
draintc
#216493640Friday, May 12, 2017 9:26 PM GMT

war us with a score
theNBK
#216494269Friday, May 12, 2017 9:36 PM GMT

I'd rather have a war score to 300, which is very similar or even longer than an endurance war.
Brutecus
#216494397Friday, May 12, 2017 9:38 PM GMT

So you'd be willing to keep Varcia if we had a war score that high? Which is essentially the same as having no war score, you are correct.
TheMedievalist
#216494537Friday, May 12, 2017 9:40 PM GMT

"@Hate There is nothing "dirty" about an endurance war. Unless you're saying CSP can't hold up the fight and they know this." What he said, it just shows that VAK is better than CSP.

chevron_leftchevron_leftchevron_left
    of     3