TivalizeJoin Date: 2010-07-04
Post Count: 1410 |
by all groups.
I'm wearing designer im crazy-famousdex |
|
|
We better watch out for these guys https://www.roblox.com/groups/group.aspx?gid=663539
In reality though I don't get how the terms are unfair. |
|
|
BeebartJoin Date: 2013-06-02
Post Count: 3339 |
Because a completely evenly sided base is unfair?
|
|
TivalizeJoin Date: 2010-07-04
Post Count: 1410 |
it funny
I'm wearing designer im crazy-famousdex |
|
|
It's not really the base, but rather the endurance war part.
|
|
Moist_GodJoin Date: 2016-12-05
Post Count: 582 |
Beebart at this point it doesn't even matter if the forts are fair, it's first to surrender. |
|
|
What is unfair about it?
Tell me?
|
|
FrosteusJoin Date: 2013-12-21
Post Count: 13470 |
LOL THIS IS COMING FROM RAT
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPRuL9ACZeM |
|
|
"What is unfair about it?
Tell me?"
Do you know why an endurance war would never work in this clan community? |
|
TivalizeJoin Date: 2010-07-04
Post Count: 1410 |
^
I'm wearing designer im crazy-famousdex |
|
FrosteusJoin Date: 2013-12-21
Post Count: 13470 |
"endurance war"
YOU CANT EVEN GET PAST RAID 1 XDDDDDDD |
|
|
If CSP isn't a hype clan, it should be able to be in an endurance war.
|
|
gunbotsJoin Date: 2017-01-24
Post Count: 130 |
the side who proposes endurance war is bc they want to get saved of a defeat |
|
|
The point of the endurance war is to make the losing side literally give up. That way their group will be in a really bad state afterwards and maybe even die out. And trust me, that will probably happen if one side get's dominated enough. But if the wins are even then this might take a while. |
|
|
You can't lose an endurance war unless you surrender.
This is a cheap way for VAK to ensure they don't actually have to war CSP. |
|
|
|
The same can be said about rat |
|
|
A group could be dead, but if the leader just decides to never surrender then the war continues.
|
|
TreeRex64Join Date: 2013-02-08
Post Count: 441 |
The problem isn't the bases, the bases are ok. The problem is VAK wants to do a endurance war, knowing they'll NEVER surrender, knowing they'll get DESTROYED by CSP if they did a legit war.
- Leet Clutcher Tree |
|
|
I'd not mind having a war too about 100 wins or so. And too be honest I think that is what may happen if the war continues for too long without any surrender. But if one group does get dominated and loses over and over again then even if they refuse to surrender, I think most of us will be able to see the side which won more as the victor. |
|
|
I think most of us saw TGI as the victor in the VAK/TGI war, however VAK somehow won? |
|
TreeecowJoin Date: 2011-06-10
Post Count: 5161 |
"I'd not mind having a war too about 100 wins or so. And too be honest I think that is what may happen if the war continues for too long without any surrender. But if one group does get dominated and loses over and over again then even if they refuse to surrender, I think most of us will be able to see the side which won more as the victor."
I remember back in the day when TGI was stomping VAK 27-1 after a week of war. Too bad the history books only remember VAK winning because of the SMO updates, even though one side was clearly more dominant. |
|
|
no official winner even if you -see- them as the victor |
|
jd123Join Date: 2007-05-27
Post Count: 4993 |
team |
|