of     1   

vinblob242
#216991586Sunday, May 21, 2017 12:59 AM GMT

[53rd Congress of the United States of America] [The 20th of May, in the year of our Lord 2017] Section 1. This act shall be titled the "Secession of California From the Union Act of 2017." This act has been made on May 20th, 2017, and is solely made by Representative Vinblob242. Section 2. California is pure, uber liberal so why not make them secede? No one wants that diversity anyways!!! Section 3. Bill has normal rules of passing or failing. Signed, Representative Vinblob242, Ohio's 4th Congressional District, [ISO-OH]
Castlemore
#216991740Sunday, May 21, 2017 1:02 AM GMT

SOOOO SICK OF THESE RO-NATION THREADS
AnimatedDannyo
#216991988Sunday, May 21, 2017 1:08 AM GMT

states can't secede u idiot ᗩᘉᓰᗰᗩ☂ᕮↁᗪᗩᘉᘉϒ〇
jltom
#216992021Sunday, May 21, 2017 1:08 AM GMT

Secession of California From the Union Act of 2017 r+://458563499r+://458563471r+://458563418 JLTOM | JUSTIN50003 | KENNYOMEGA
DAVIDGC890
#217002160Sunday, May 21, 2017 4:19 AM GMT

im a conservative and i live in cali!!!!!!!!!!! ill move to texas anyways
red65560
#217002254Sunday, May 21, 2017 4:21 AM GMT

just leave then california is too liberal for normal people to live in, at least the cities anyways.
xXWolversXx
#217005761Sunday, May 21, 2017 5:49 AM GMT

what form of stage 4 cancer is this
RevenantKing
#217006001Sunday, May 21, 2017 5:56 AM GMT

>states can't secede u idiot why aren't we daft? You're also wrong.
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#217064793Monday, May 22, 2017 1:29 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
AnimatedDannyo
#217070230Monday, May 22, 2017 3:04 AM GMT

1. We don't have states, so how could one secede? 2. States cannot secede. In Texas v. White, the Supreme Court ruled that secession does not exist legally and the constitution cannot recognize such. ᗩᘉᓰᗰᗩ☂ᕮↁᗪᗩᘉᘉϒ〇
bob561
#217101337Monday, May 22, 2017 6:49 PM GMT

I swear to god, Congress just gets worse and worse with these stupid bills. NUSA does not have states, The founder removed them. Lets also take a look at where states lie within our constitution... Oh wait, they do not exist within the constitution. This also leaves me with a pretty generative precedent that establishes the same concept, United States vs. Las Vegas, 2 U.S. 5 (2017) established that Localities do not have the authority to create their own legislation because the constitution did not give it to them, and the states. "There exists serious contention among supporters and doubters about the applicability of states in our United States, and whether they can truly be created. Our Constitution is clear: they cannot. In passing our Constitution, the entire concept of the “state” was omitted on purpose; the lawmakers responsible felt that it would be too difficult to organize and put into practical use in our country." (Geithner, 1) So it is pretty clear, States do not exist in NUSA, therefor, secession is not possible. Get with the times boys!
red65560
#217155290Tuesday, May 23, 2017 4:01 PM GMT

LA is inside CA though so that means it's removed if this passes. LA sucks so who cares lol

    of     1