of     1   

xvbones
#218558583Saturday, June 10, 2017 1:08 PM GMT

theres no valid reason for it to exist
Pumaface011
#218558641Saturday, June 10, 2017 1:10 PM GMT

Yes there is a reason. We also did this in the past, everybody was friends with everybody.
dinnomint
#218558809Saturday, June 10, 2017 1:15 PM GMT

So what if everybody was friends with everybody?
ImAFatGuyLoLoL
#218559102Saturday, June 10, 2017 1:23 PM GMT

Support, I want to accept all 861 friend request I have
dinnomint
#218559143Saturday, June 10, 2017 1:25 PM GMT

@ImA I adore the originality in your username.
infortality
#218559168Saturday, June 10, 2017 1:25 PM GMT

You can't maintain a social ############ with more than 200 people.
infortality
#218559236Saturday, June 10, 2017 1:27 PM GMT

social connection*
dinnomint
#218559260Saturday, June 10, 2017 1:28 PM GMT

Connectivity?
dinnomint
#218559276Saturday, June 10, 2017 1:28 PM GMT

Never mind, lmao.
xvbones
#218559451Saturday, June 10, 2017 1:34 PM GMT

you don't need to talk to all 200 of them every day lol its just a mutual friendship
DrAngelJr
#218563783Saturday, June 10, 2017 3:12 PM GMT

Support
DailyRoLord
#218563864Saturday, June 10, 2017 3:14 PM GMT

There's also no valid reason for you to have several thou sand friends. Are you actually gonna keep in touch with them all?
xvbones
#218571103Saturday, June 10, 2017 5:10 PM GMT

where did i say several thousand
ShippyCar3
#218573427Saturday, June 10, 2017 5:45 PM GMT

There's not really a good reason for the friend limit to exist anyway. Support.

    of     1