|
*I totally don't wanna profit off those ugly wool hats* |
|
|
Also to make up for the fact that they removed tix |
|
|
Ehhh you guys get something other than "bring back tix" and you guys ignore it |
|
privateyJoin Date: 2013-03-22
Post Count: 195 |
because it is quite useless |
|
MrDrChefJoin Date: 2013-10-07
Post Count: 5245 |
no, we're running ROBLOX's game.
we deserve it. |
|
|
|
Why do all the NBC whine about their rights
Be grateful the game isn't pay to play
Color splash! |
|
|
^ if game was pay to play then it wouldnt even exist BECAUSE of REASONS |
|
|
This is mostly for the ex-BC because most NBC wouldn't have limiteds in the first place.
IMO it will make buying BC for the first time more attractive (and then get it again later on if they enjoyed it) since they wouldn't be constrained to a short period of time after buying limiteds, but I'm prolly wrong. Maybe there should be restrictions to make it fair I guess. |
|
|
Support, I want 6k in my pocket not my hats |
|
DinoteddiJoin Date: 2016-05-03
Post Count: 3567 |
Support |
|
MrDrChefJoin Date: 2013-10-07
Post Count: 5245 |
funny how the only people saying support are nbc.
grow up |
|
|
cannooJoin Date: 2014-02-13
Post Count: 7428 |
Could ruin limited prices
No support
-_-🅷🅴🅻🅻🅾 🅼🆈 🅳🆄🅳🅴-_- |
|
|
"we run the game"
no you dont lol |
|
|
Guys this would destroy ROBLOX because every limited is not free so you would have to WORK (yeah working is unimaginable in game about Imagination) or they previously buy BC/Robux |
|
|
What do you mean by ruin limited prices?
Also it'll provide more hats that can be bought by the BC people
P.S. not everyone nags their mom for 6 bucks for a lego ripoff game. Maybe they can introduce external ads to mobile |
|
|
Why remove tix if they were gonna have to make this compensation
If they saw this coming, they would've just kept tix |
|
|
|
that would break many things so no
what dont you understand about membership?
|
|