SuperSorcerer
#22140475Sunday, March 07, 2010 6:27 PM GMT

Taslem, you should revise the consequences.
Toadsworth29
#22140613Sunday, March 07, 2010 6:29 PM GMT

This idea fails. If a thread is old, IGNORE IT!
TaslemGuy
#22140813Sunday, March 07, 2010 6:33 PM GMT

Toadsworth? i CAN ignore it. other people are too stupid too. Honestly, once, someone dug up a thread from 06 in Technical issues, that made it look like a forum mod was spamming. people started flaming him for no reason, not realizing it was old.
bouncyball6
#22141012Sunday, March 07, 2010 6:36 PM GMT

That was one time. Вσшпсуьаιι6
Toadsworth29
#22149348Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:47 PM GMT

So, the mods should be more careful of what they say.
TaslemGuy
#22159948Sunday, March 07, 2010 11:36 PM GMT

He wasn't a mod when he said it. And at the time, it was correct.
Pichu7245
#22160313Sunday, March 07, 2010 11:43 PM GMT

I like the idea. Bumping old threads can start flame wars and cause massive rule breaking. Ban the bumpers of old threads!
SaintDemon
#22162892Monday, March 08, 2010 12:34 AM GMT

They should get a 1 week or 2 week ban
TaslemGuy
#22208961Tuesday, March 09, 2010 12:58 AM GMT

Thanks. I suppose a permaban is too harsh.
razor125
#22209570Tuesday, March 09, 2010 1:06 AM GMT

to hard of a punishment
Quackoid
#22209715Tuesday, March 09, 2010 1:08 AM GMT

Listen. Im a TR (Thread Reviver). Not a TRoll. I think this idea is the worst idea ever. Furthermore, It might be a really great idea that may benefit ROBLOX alot. Maybe even make ROBLOX more popular. RBLX more popular = More money for RBLX = More cool updates = RBLX more popular, ect. I revive old 06 or 07 threads. If this were an update, many popular people (maybe even a mod or a admin) will get automatically banned and they will think RBLX is bad, and they will talk to their friends telling them RBLX is bad. People banned for no reason = People bad-mouthing RBLX = RBLX less and less popular = Less money for RBLX = RBLX down the tubes. Do you want RBLX to end, Taslem?
TaslemGuy
#22323362Thursday, March 11, 2010 10:15 PM GMT

Quackoid? You do realize bumping old threads are against the rules? I'm asking for the rule to be enforced. "Reviving threads" is nothing short of spam.
halowave
#22325913Thursday, March 11, 2010 11:01 PM GMT

One time I was scaning the forums and i opened and replied to a thread. It was on the first page but somebody asked why I would bump a 3 year old thread.......What happened there?
Quackoid
#22326795Thursday, March 11, 2010 11:17 PM GMT

Taslem, Ive seen you around the fourms. You just want ROBLOX to end. Go jump in a hole.
CoolTJP
#22326885Thursday, March 11, 2010 11:19 PM GMT

No. Warning, Warning. BAN. Thats how it should go.
johnny10
#22326946Thursday, March 11, 2010 11:20 PM GMT

Very good idea but if someone did bump one then someone else posts on it don't ban the second poster because they might of didn't know it was bumped.
100P3rcent
#22327455Thursday, March 11, 2010 11:29 PM GMT

I agree. We need to stop those idiots who bump old threads. It's spam, annoying, and pointless. SUPPORT.
77poker
#22327555Thursday, March 11, 2010 11:31 PM GMT

no this idea is a fail u guys must have all bump your therad before this idea fails
snakehunt
#22327575Thursday, March 11, 2010 11:31 PM GMT

calm down a bit taslemguy we all gotta get used to the noobs around here....no forum is perfect from a bump.....
Quackoid
#22327631Thursday, March 11, 2010 11:32 PM GMT

I said it before, Ill say it again. Listen. Im a TR (Thread Reviver). Not a TRoll. I think this idea is the worst idea ever. Furthermore, It might be a really great idea that may benefit ROBLOX alot. Maybe even make ROBLOX more popular. RBLX more popular = More money for RBLX = More cool updates = RBLX more popular, ect. I revive old 06 or 07 threads. If this were an update, many popular people (maybe even a mod or a admin) will get automatically banned and they will think RBLX is bad, and they will talk to their friends telling them RBLX is bad. People banned for no reason = People bad-mouthing RBLX = RBLX less and less popular = Less money for RBLX = RBLX down the tubes. Do you want RBLX to end, Taslem?
snakehunt
#22327686Thursday, March 11, 2010 11:33 PM GMT

we all heard you.....-_-
100P3rcent
#22327737Thursday, March 11, 2010 11:34 PM GMT

I said it before, Ill say it again. Listen. Im a TR (Thread Reviver). Not a TRoll. I think this idea is the worst idea ever. Furthermore, It might be a really great idea that may benefit ROBLOX alot. Maybe even make ROBLOX more popular. RBLX more popular = More money for RBLX = More cool updates = RBLX more popular, ect. I revive old 06 or 07 threads. If this were an update, many popular people (maybe even a mod or a admin) will get automatically banned and they will think RBLX is bad, and they will talk to their friends telling them RBLX is bad. People banned for no reason = People bad-mouthing RBLX = RBLX less and less popular = Less money for RBLX = RBLX down the tubes. Do you want RBLX to end, Taslem? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thread revivers are spammers. Spammers deserve punishment. Best punishment is a ban. You deserve a ban.
Quackoid
#22350409Friday, March 12, 2010 12:40 PM GMT

People who want ROBLOX to end and therefore are noobs who like to proove me wrong: 100P3rcent TaslemGuy (TaslemNoob)
Quackoid
#22350410Friday, March 12, 2010 12:40 PM GMT

People who want ROBLOX to end and therefore are noobs who like to proove me wrong: 100P3rcent TaslemGuy (TaslemNoob)
100P3rcent
#22351542Friday, March 12, 2010 1:51 PM GMT

Listen up, Quacky. Thread bumping is AGAINST THE RULES. ROBLOX isnt going to end if we punish the morons who bump old threads. The idea is simply enforcing the rules. And you apparently hate the rules of the forums.