of     6   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#226485730Tuesday, October 17, 2017 3:11 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
Dekania
#226485820Tuesday, October 17, 2017 3:15 AM GMT

Really good. There's a lot of detail in everything. One thing I want to say though, the colors are a bit lacking on the space station. Otherwise, 9.5/10
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#226485899Tuesday, October 17, 2017 3:18 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
Dekania
#226485927Tuesday, October 17, 2017 3:19 AM GMT

Ah, that explains it. I would've just tried to make the colors more appealing, you know?
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#226485965Tuesday, October 17, 2017 3:21 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
G003Y
#226487151Tuesday, October 17, 2017 4:14 AM GMT

pretty god damn good 100000/100000 how long did it take
itZAKU
#226487856Tuesday, October 17, 2017 4:55 AM GMT

Detail - 7/10 Layout - 9/10
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#226487880Tuesday, October 17, 2017 4:57 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
itZAKU
#226487904Tuesday, October 17, 2017 4:58 AM GMT

Layout design, aka the design itself, could be better in my opinion in detailing wise though.
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#226487935Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5:00 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
itZAKU
#226487965Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5:02 AM GMT

Obviously you didn't make it yourself[design], it's a based on a real-life design, as if that wasn't obvious enough. It's realism, but I think you could've chose a better design in aesthetic-wise.
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#226487988Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5:03 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
itZAKU
#226488122Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5:12 AM GMT

I have not intended imply that at all. When I say it could've been a better design in aesthetic-wise I mean by: - A cramped layout, more complexed shapes, the harder and complexed the layout is the better (aesthetic-wise), now if you were to make a certain replica of something for someone then that is totally understandable, but out of the few other models I would've chosen another one, but we all have personal favorites and taste. Just my own personal opinion on how I would think it would be a better build.
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#226488165Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5:15 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#226488275Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5:22 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
itZAKU
#226488278Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5:22 AM GMT

,but yet again, when I said better build I meant detailed wise, I didn't think I needed to clarify that. You are going for realism, so in that case I think the design itself was fine when it comes to realism, in aesthetic-wise, as stated many time before, no. I mean, we only use 10% of our brains at once, so you aren't wrong.
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#226488333Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5:26 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
itZAKU
#226488359Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5:28 AM GMT

Thank's for pointing out the obvious...
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#226488380Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5:30 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
Life_Threatening
#226488445Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5:35 AM GMT

How do you get inside? Subscribe to "Terminandrew" on YouTube! || https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCNth3evvuwH87h1dqcu3Owg?sub_confirmation=1
itZAKU
#226488463Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5:36 AM GMT

All in all though, I think you did an okay job on this, thus could use improvement as there is always room for improvement, hence on other general opinions.
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#226488475Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5:37 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#226488492Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5:38 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
CWSinister
#226488579Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5:46 AM GMT

Personally I'd recommend this build to - https://www.roblox.com/groups/group.aspx?gid=1396
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#226488616Tuesday, October 17, 2017 5:48 AM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]

    of     6   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right