of     1   

Tcnja
#37839518Monday, November 29, 2010 8:29 PM GMT

"The time has come! For surely the tide is crashing against the shores of this great nation, ever receding the sands of time. A history of greatness waiting to be replenished with the glistening sands of truth! " "A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one." Alexander Hamilton Let's set the record straight. There is no argument over the choice between peace and war, but there is only one guaranteed way you can have peace--and you can have it in the next second--surrender. Admittedly there is a risk in any course we follow other than this, but every lesson in history tells us that the greater risk lies in appeasement, and this is the specter our well-meaning liberal friends refuse to face--that their policy of accommodation is appeasement, and it gives no choice between peace and war, only between fight and surrender. If we continue to accommodate, continue to back and retreat, eventually we have to face the final demand--the ultimatum. And what then? When Nikita Khrushchev has told his people he knows what our answer will be? He has told them that we are retreating under the pressure of the Cold War, and someday when the time comes to deliver the ultimatum, our surrender will be voluntary because by that time we will have weakened from within spiritually, morally, and economically. He believes this because from our side he has heard voices pleading for "peace at any price" or "better Red than dead," or as one commentator put it, he would rather "live on his knees than die on his feet." And therein lies the road to war, because those voices don't speak for the rest of us. You and I know and do not believe that life is so dear and peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery. If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin--just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard 'round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nassis didn't die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well, it's a simple answer after all. You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, "There is a price we will not pay." There is a point beyond which they must not advance. This is the meaning in the phrase of Barry Goldwater's "peace through strength." Winston Churchill said that "the destiny of man is not measured by material computation. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we are spirits--not animals." And he said, "There is something going on in time and space, and beyond time and space, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty." You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on Earth, or we will sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness.
Dr01d3k4
#37840056Monday, November 29, 2010 8:41 PM GMT

And why is this in the language center?
Tcnja
#37840290Monday, November 29, 2010 8:46 PM GMT

Is not a speech part of language?
Tcnja
#37840605Monday, November 29, 2010 8:52 PM GMT

" vicis has adveho! Pro nam estus est fragosus obviam brevis illae? valde populus , umquam recipio sands of vicis. A history of maiestas exspecto futurus replenished per glistening sands of verum! " "A populus quod can antepono opprobrium ut periculosus est paratus parumper vinco , quod mereo mereor one." Alexander Hamilton Let's paro record rectus. Illic est haud argument super choice inter pacis quod bellum , tamen illic est unus guaranteed via vos can have pacis - quod vos can have is in tunc secundus - trado Admittedly illic est a periculum in ullus tractus nos insisto alius is , tamen sulum dictata in history dico nos ut quantum periculum lies in appeasement , quod is est phasmatis nostrum puteus - voluntas probus amicitia renuo ut visio - ut suum excolo of accommodation est appeasement , quod is dat haud choice inter pacis quod bellum , tantum inter pugna quod trado. Si nos persevero ut accommodate , persevero ut tergum quod verto eventually nos have ut visio denique requiro - ultimatum. Quod quis tunc? Ut Nikita Khrushchev has told suus populus is teneo quis nostrum refero ero? Is has told lemma ut nos es verto sub pressure of Gelu Bellum , quod nonnullus ut vicis adveho ut vindico ultimatum , nostrum trado ero voluntarius quoniam illa vicis nos mos have infractus e spiritually , castimonia , quod parce. Is puto is quoniam ex nostrum pars is has auditus vox vocis oro pro " pacis procul ullus pretium " vel " melior Rutilus quam mortuus " vel ut unus commentator loco is , is would quinymo " ago in suus genua quam intereo in suus feet. " Quod inibi lies via ut bellum , quoniam illud vox vocis don't narro cetera nostrum. Vos quod EGO teneo quod operor non puto ut vita est sic carus quod pacis sic dulcis ut futurus emo procul pretium of chains quod servitus. Si nusquam in vita est wo
Tcnja
#37840629Monday, November 29, 2010 8:53 PM GMT

Ha, now's it's in multible languages!
Dr01d3k4
#37840686Monday, November 29, 2010 8:54 PM GMT

1. The point of this forum is to speak in languages that are _not_ English. 2. I bet you used google translator for that.
Dr01d3k4
#37840799Monday, November 29, 2010 8:56 PM GMT

Actually, I know you used google translator (or some other translating program) because I can see English words in there. GOOGLE TRANSLATOR/OTHER TRANSLATING PROGRAMS ALWAYS GET IT WRONG
Tcnja
#37841027Monday, November 29, 2010 9:00 PM GMT

ας εμάs θέτω the καταγράφω ευθύς. υπάρχει όχι επιχείρημα πάνω the choice ανάμεσα ειρήνη και πολεμοs , μα υπάρχει μόνο έναs εγγύηση δρόμος εσύ μπορείs έχω ειρήνη - και εσύ μπορείs έχω αυτό μέσα στο επόμενος δεύτερος εγκαταλείπω. ομολογουμένως υπάρχει έναs κίνδυνοs μέσα οποιοσδήποτε πορεία εμείs ακολουθώ άλλος από this , μα κάθε μάθημα μέσα ιστορία λέω εμάs ότι the σπουδαίος κίνδυνοs lies μέσα κατευνασμός , και αυτό είναι the φάσμα δικός μας καλά - με νόημα φιλελεύθερος φίλοι αρνούμαι σε πρόσωπο - ότι δικό τουs πολιτική του προσαρμογές is κατευνασμός , και αυτό δίνω όχι choice ανάμεσα ειρήνη και πολεμοs , μόνο ανάμεσα μάχη και surrender. εάν εμείs συνεχίζω προσαρμόζω , συνεχίζω σε πλάτη και υποχωρώ eventually έχουμε σε πρόσωπο the τελικός απαίτηση - the τελεσίγραφο. και what τότε? πότε Nikita Khrushchev έχει είπα δικός του άνθρωποι αυτόs γνωρίζω what δικός μας απαντώ θα να είμαι? αυτόs έχει είπα αυτούς ότι εμείs είμαστε υποχωρώ κάτω the πίεση του ψυχρός πόλεμος , και κάποια μέρα πότε the ώρα έρχεται σε παραδίδω the τελεσίγραφο , δικός μας surrender θα να είμαι αυθόρμητα διότι ως τότε εμείs θα έχω εξασθένισα από με πνευματικός , ηθικός , και οικονομικά. αυτόs πιστεύω this διότι από δικός μας πλευρά αυτόs έχει άκουσα φωνή pleading για " ειρήνη σε οποιοσδήποτε τιμή " ή " καλύτερος κόκκινο από νεκρός " ή όπως έναs commentator βάζω αυτό , αυτόs θα rather " ζω επάνω δικός του γόνατο από πεθαίνω επάνω δικός του πόδια " και εκεί lies the δρόμοs σε πολεμοs , διότι εκείνοι φωνή don't μιλώ για το υπόλοιπο του εμάs. εσύ κι εγώ γνωρίζω και κάνω όχι πιστεύω ότι ζωή is so Αγαπητέ και ειρήνη so γλυκός όσο για το να είμαι αγόρασα στο τιμή του chains και σκλαβιά. εάν τίποτα εν ζωή is αξίζω dying για , πότε έκανα this ξεκινώ - μόλιs αντιμέτωπος με this εχθρός? ή θα Moses έχω είπα the παιδιά του Ισραήλ σε ζω μέσα σκλαβιά κάτω the φαραώ? θα χριστιανόs έχω αρνήθηκα the σταυρός? θα χριστιανόs έχω αρνήθηκα the σταυρός? θα the patriots σε κοίλος γέφυρα έχω λαιμόs κάτω δικό τουs guns και αρνήθηκα σε φωτιά the shot άκουσα 'round the κόσμοs? The martyrs του ιστορία λυκάνθρωπος όχι τρελός , και δικός μας τιμώμενο νεκρός ποιόs έδωσα δικό τουs ζωέs σε σταματώ the προωθώ του Nassis didn't πεθαίνω μέσα μάταιος. πού , τότε is the δρόμοs σε ειρήνη? καλά , αυτό είναι έναs απλό απαντώ στο κάτω-κάτω. εσύ κι εγώ έχω the κουράγιο λέω σε δικός μας εχθρός , " υπάρχει έναs τιμή εμείs θα όχι pay. " υπάρχει έναs θέμα πέρα από ο οποίος αυτοί μουστάκι όχι προωθώ. αυτό είναι the με νόημα μέσα στο φράση του στρατώνες Goldwater's " ειρήνη διαμέσου δύναμη Winston εκκλησία είπα ότι the μοίρα του άντραs is όχι μέτρο από material computation. πότε σπουδαίος δύναμη είναι επάνω σε κινώ μέσα στο κόσμοs , εμείs μαθαίνω εμείs είμαστε πνεύματα - όχι ζώο " και αυτόs είπε , " υπάρχει κάτι μετάβαση επάνω έγκαιρα και διάστημα , και πέρα από ώρα και διάστημα , ο οποίος , κατά πόσον εμείs αρέσω αυτό ή όχι , συλλαβίζω καθήκον " εσύ κι εγώ έχω έναs rendezvous με μοίρα. εμείs θα διατηρημένος για δικός μας παιδιά δικός μας χώρα , τελευταίοs καλύτερος ελπίδα του άντραs επάνω γη , ή εμείs θα πρόταση αυτούς σε παίρνω the τελευταίοs σκαλί into έναs thousand χρόνια του σκοτεινιά.
Dr01d3k4
#37841103Monday, November 29, 2010 9:01 PM GMT

Again, obvious translating program abuser. Could you please just stop failing so much?
Igloogirl3
#37841145Monday, November 29, 2010 9:02 PM GMT

Only translators can do that stuff. You have to learn how to really type in greek. -nice speech, I guess.
skystreamer
#37841494Monday, November 29, 2010 9:08 PM GMT

@Dr0id im pretty sure the creator of this forum can demote you in UCR if your in it.
Dr01d3k4
#37841936Monday, November 29, 2010 9:16 PM GMT

What the hell is UCR?
Tcnja
#37954750Thursday, December 02, 2010 1:37 AM GMT

The greatest clan ever created.
libyaitalia
#37970819Thursday, December 02, 2010 1:31 PM GMT

Noob, posts this without translations to WWC (world Wide chat). There we talk and discuss about politics
MrBlockson
#37974216Thursday, December 02, 2010 4:55 PM GMT

You think that for calling the OP an idiot for failing in language, he can demote someone who isn't in your little group? Du hast geschmeckt. That sounded wrong.

    of     1