rotototo
#19657536Sunday, January 17, 2010 3:51 AM GMT

Modifey to the idea. If someone has a bricksmith badge on their alt, which will not damage the big leauges, then the name stays. However, if the person does NOT have a bricksmith and stays logged out for one year, then they can be deleted. Take "Spock" for example. Almost everyone knows the name, no one can use it. Some noob took it in 2007, then left it.
EmoNation
#42498090Sunday, February 13, 2011 11:22 PM GMT

I know I hate when people do that
RadioactiveWafflez
#42498974Sunday, February 13, 2011 11:36 PM GMT

NBC should get 5, and BC should get 15, Mods still limitless. That way it would be easier to keep track of alts.
RadioactiveWafflez
#42499035Sunday, February 13, 2011 11:37 PM GMT

Nevermind didn't notice 5 pages, only read the first page.
kai3345
#42499087Sunday, February 13, 2011 11:37 PM GMT

No.
MrSuperSpace
#42500190Sunday, February 13, 2011 11:52 PM GMT

Eh, some people don't log on so they cn get more RObux and Tix
EmoNation
#42500275Sunday, February 13, 2011 11:53 PM GMT

Yea but they don't stay logged off for 3 years to do that.
MrSuperSpace
#42500352Sunday, February 13, 2011 11:55 PM GMT

What's the point of alts if you aren't banned?
JUSTINBG
#42501280Monday, February 14, 2011 12:09 AM GMT

NO,ABSOLUTELY NOT. People like Are92 and others do not deserve to be deleted for NO REASON. And if you are going to whine about people taking names that you wanted,DEAL WITH IT AND THINK OF A NEW ONE.
deathfangs20
#42504392Monday, February 14, 2011 1:00 AM GMT

Some BC members manually make new accounts just to buy their shirt, so there are probably BC members that have more than 100 alts.
deathfangs20
#42504424Monday, February 14, 2011 1:00 AM GMT

oh... this is 5 pages long.... i replied to something said on page 1.
Stewiepwns
#42504514Monday, February 14, 2011 1:02 AM GMT

No on the part where a banned user's name becomes available. If STHHXX gets banned, think of how many people will take that name and get undue credit. Same for other famous people.
deathfangs20
#42506037Monday, February 14, 2011 1:26 AM GMT

There is a problem with this idea. People who get banned still have places that can be played at if somone can find them.
Violating
#43068736Friday, February 25, 2011 4:59 AM GMT

Would you say my name is violating ROBLOX rules?
Legoegoman
#43070481Friday, February 25, 2011 6:13 AM GMT

Its called Name Sniping
Legoegoman
#43070492Friday, February 25, 2011 6:14 AM GMT

lol ik Are92's real player hes my friend.
Jasonheart22
#43070563Friday, February 25, 2011 6:17 AM GMT

Limit of 10 alts? What a fail. Vendettathegreat has over 2000 alts.
gamesam
#43071746Friday, February 25, 2011 8:05 AM GMT

worst idea i've see
bunnybunn264
#43071839Friday, February 25, 2011 8:23 AM GMT

2008 thread... :o Yeah, I think old accounts should be deleted, ESPECIALLY if they hadn't accomplished much (nooby name-sniper), but important historical figures would remain. I think you could make a formula, and if they have a score (using the formula) under a certain amount, they will be deleted.
MattOwnz
#43071864Friday, February 25, 2011 8:29 AM GMT

That would be awesome if ROBLOX delete accounts that haven't been on for a year cause seriously..... all the cool names were taken i wanted to name my self mattwolf but that 1 was taken :l
MattOwnz
#43071882Friday, February 25, 2011 8:32 AM GMT

And ya some people already got main accounts and make a alt account with Epic names so people won't use it! but still am kinda lucky i got a cool user name xD the 1 i wanted! :P
Techmagss
#43076075Friday, February 25, 2011 2:00 PM GMT

Brilliant idea but i usually stay on my account so i would most likely get removed.Other than that,no flaws,i support. BUMP BUMP BUMP LIKE YOUR LIFE DEPENDED ON IT!
Techmagss
#43076131Friday, February 25, 2011 2:03 PM GMT

Oh and you know those dudes THELDUDE THEODUDE and THELDUDE?They make your favorites say LOL and i think they have not been on for a while.If their accounts get removed their places shall die with them,making your profile not lol anymore.Any way to fix this?
watevs44
#43076600Friday, February 25, 2011 2:24 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
Violating
#43107948Saturday, February 26, 2011 1:19 AM GMT

This whole thread is a fail.