bawlsaku
#48963566Monday, June 20, 2011 4:49 AM GMT

@ JulienDethurens In denial much?
bawlsaku
#48963607Monday, June 20, 2011 4:50 AM GMT

"Why do you want to win? That's not the point of this forum, neither of this thread! //I should ask you the same thing. And I still think that javascript would be a way better alternative than VBS." //Who cares?
JulienDethurens
#48963644Monday, June 20, 2011 4:51 AM GMT

We're not talking about peanut butter and my post is relevant because I am proposing an alternative to using VBS, an alternative that would be able to be used by far more users than VBS and that would use a language considered as a standard on the web instead of a Microsoft language. How is that not relevant?
bawlsaku
#48963729Monday, June 20, 2011 4:53 AM GMT

@Julien How IS it relevant? Who cares about a JavaSkript alternative? I mean really? If you have a new idea, please explain it.
miloguy
#48963748Monday, June 20, 2011 4:53 AM GMT

OMG SIGGIES AND 3 PAGE ARGUMENT ON IRRELEVANCE!!! WHATS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE
bawlsaku
#48963764Monday, June 20, 2011 4:53 AM GMT

@milo agreed
JulienDethurens
#48963853Monday, June 20, 2011 4:55 AM GMT

Agreed. I asked him many times what was the point of arguing. =/ Bawlsaku, I'm just proposing javascript as an alternative to VBS because you used VBS in the post. Javascript would be available to way more users.
bawlsaku
#48963957Monday, June 20, 2011 4:58 AM GMT

@Julien I know, I asked Julien MANY times his point of arguing, and he ALWAYS evades the question! And, okay, you are posing something new. That doesn't make me forget about your previous idiotic argument. JavaScript would be better for more advanced users. But this is supposed to be SIMPLE. If you really want to pose this now, then you must provide how to do it for the newbie users.
miloguy
#48964020Monday, June 20, 2011 4:59 AM GMT

inb4argumentaboutarguing
bawlsaku
#48964062Monday, June 20, 2011 5:00 AM GMT

@miloguy Are you an idiot?! NOW ONE HERE IS ARGUING! /joke
JulienDethurens
#48964074Monday, June 20, 2011 5:01 AM GMT

Why would javascript be for advanced users? I don't get your point. And please stop insulting me.
miloguy
#48964103Monday, June 20, 2011 5:02 AM GMT

super-beginners shouldnt make URL decoders
JulienDethurens
#48964163Monday, June 20, 2011 5:04 AM GMT

First, I don't like the name URL decoder because it isn't about decoding urls, it is abotu finding where they redirect to. Also, it's not about beginners making it, it's about them USING it.
miloguy
#48964241Monday, June 20, 2011 5:06 AM GMT

"Also, it's not about beginners making it, it's about them USING it." Well that sucks for whoevers trying to make it
bawlsaku
#48964273Monday, June 20, 2011 5:06 AM GMT

@Julien You first. And you also are inferring something not true. You think that ALL programmers automatically know JavaScript. And you are stupid, I mean seriously. "not about beginners making it, it's about them USING it". -_- They have to make it to use it. And I'd much rather know how to make my own beef jerky, then buy it at the store. Because it's $8 for a small bag, and I can make 3 large containers for about $12. @milo But this code is for beginners just to show them a concept. this isn't something complex. It's just the concept I wanted them to see.
JulienDethurens
#48964363Monday, June 20, 2011 5:09 AM GMT

We make it for them and then they use it. How doesn't that make sense? I never said that all programmers know JavaScript. That comes out of nowhere.
bawlsaku
#48964420Monday, June 20, 2011 5:10 AM GMT

@Julien The knowledge of JavaScript DOESN'T come out of know where! It's actually a language you have to LEARN. Dingbat! And saying a JavaScript Chrome Extension is BASIC, is saying that everyone should know how to do it! Chrome Extensions are easy to make once you understand them, but they are ADVANCED! Even if YOU think they are easy, it doesn't matter. They are still at an advanced level.
JulienDethurens
#48964517Monday, June 20, 2011 5:13 AM GMT

I NEVER TALKED ABOUT A CHROME EXTENSION. STOP INVENTING THINGS OUT OF NOWHERE. I never said either that everyone knows JavaScript, and it's the same for VBS. Incase you didn't know, JavaScript wasn't invented for making Chrome extensions.
bawlsaku
#48964692Monday, June 20, 2011 5:17 AM GMT

"Stop inventing things" Are you a broken record? Not only did I prove you wrong about that TWICE, but you KEEP ON SAYING IT! I mean, really?! ANYONE can read back and see that I am right, so drop it. Your previous posts won't just disappear if you want it to. You implied it. And I obviously know that, you're doing it again. Making up random facts to support your ego. Like seriously. What does that have to do with ANYTHING?!
Corecii
#48964842Monday, June 20, 2011 5:21 AM GMT

Before I say anything there's one thing that needs to be known: The Google Chrome extension idea in the recently started argument is thought of as already being created. It would not require you to write your own code for it. If Mustyoshi completes the task of creating the Google Chrome extension it will no longer be a problem that the extension has not yet been created. I am going to work off of the idea that the extension was already created. If it wasn't created when that person decides to choose between the two options presented in this thread, then the VBS option would be the best choice. VBS cannot be used everywhere. VBS can only be used if that person has a Windows computer. Which not everyone has one, or if they do, it might not be their most regularly used one. I agree that Windows is widely used. This would make the VBS one the worse one for them, because it would require them to do stuff that they would not normally do and they'd rather not do. The Google Chrome extension would be best since it doesn't include the user of the computer to type in anything. But not everyone uses Google Chrome, so for some people, like the VBS version, it would not be the best choice. But, most or all computers have the ability to run Google Chrome properly. This makes the Google Chrome option usable in most places, since this option can be used without switching whole computers. A big part of this though, is how many people have, and USE a Windows computer more often than a non-Windows computer. If you have a Windows computer just to do things you cannot do on other non-windows computers, then you likely will likely not be using Internet Explorer. There are still other internet browser choices though. You can use some of those, right? Of course you could. But if you wanted a fast way to figure out where links like that lead you, would you not just download Google Chrome and use it instead? Unless you needed a different browser for some reason, it would probably be the smarter choice. Also, if you wanted to use Internet Explorer instead, you could just get the IE Tab Google Chrome extension, right? The Google Chrome extension would probably be the best, since after everything is installed for it, you'd end up doing less work in the end. So now it's more of "What do the majority of people use, and would they be comfortable switching over to Google Chrome, if they aren't using it already?" If they aren't comfortable switching just to switch, would they switch in the case that they have to choose between the two options that have been argued about in this thread? If that question could be answered accurately, then we'd know which one would be used more, and which one is the best out of the two. For someone who uses Google Chrome though, the Google Chrome extension would be the best. This also applies to people that will switch to Google Chrome and not be unhappy about it..
Legend26
#48964863Monday, June 20, 2011 5:21 AM GMT

@Julien, He won't, he is a troll and we both fell for it. Stop posting and let this die. -Legend-
bawlsaku
#48964902Monday, June 20, 2011 5:22 AM GMT

@Legend You are just calling me a troll because you are upset you lost. @Corecii Don't plagiarize things. please. Post where you copied that from and then I'll read it.
Corecii
#48965065Monday, June 20, 2011 5:25 AM GMT

Why do you think I copied it? Because I took time to write it? Read it. It talks about an argument, in a thread, with two options, which are a Google Chrome extension and a VBS way of doing the same thing. It includes 'Mustyoshi' in it, and the VBS way is a way where you have to type somethign in. Unless there was a big coincidence and it just happened that there was another thread on another forum with the same stuff that's happening now, I don't think it's copied.
Fubl
#48965251Monday, June 20, 2011 5:30 AM GMT

OP, don't insult people just because they think their idea is better. For one your attitude of repeatably calling people idiots and immature is quite dull and expected of people lesser learned to those in this forum. Also, fun fact, javascript can be used in both windows, mac, and linux computers. ....And it can be executed in IE9.
bawlsaku
#48965274Monday, June 20, 2011 5:31 AM GMT

@Corecii Yes, I believed you copied it. I will only read the first sentence of each since you won't tell me where you got it from. '--- The Google Chrome extension idea in the recently started argument is thought of as already being created. //If it wasn't released, then who cares? VBS cannot be used everywhere. VBS can only be used if that person has a Windows computer. //You obviously have not been following any of the posts A big part of this though, is how many people have, and USE a Windows computer more often than a non-Windows computer. //Again The Google Chrome extension would probably be the best, since after everything is installed for it, you'd end up doing less work in the end. //Ya, end up working months of hard work to successfully learn JavaScript and creating extensions just to make a perfect one So now it's more of "What do the majority of people use, and would they be comfortable switching over to Google Chrome, if they aren't using it already?" //People who don't use Chrome are usually stubborn minded and wouldn't switch over if the world depended on it For someone who uses Google Chrome though, the Google Chrome extension would be the best. //Again, months of learning two languages for something simple as this OBVIOUSLY harder than remembering a few basic lines