of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

runalex123
#59043548Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:29 PM GMT

i would say no because they shouldn't be in the Natty if they can't beat the teams in their own confrence (unless its Alabama)
extemmasfriend2
#59043716Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:32 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
Southpoint
#59043758Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:32 PM GMT

Exteemas, should they go if both of them can't even win their confrence?
runalex123
#59043771Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:33 PM GMT

hmm yeah true but still... idk its confusing
runalex123
#59043851Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:34 PM GMT

@extemmasfriend2 but what your saying is, because they beat Alabama they can lose any games now and still go to the Natty?
extemmasfriend2
#59043911Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:35 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
extemmasfriend2
#59043968Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:35 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
patrickbun
#59043976Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:36 PM GMT

Their should be a rule where you have to win your conference to at least go to the NC.
extemmasfriend2
#59044045Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:37 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
Southpoint
#59044082Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:37 PM GMT

Exteemas, why should LSU or Alabama go. If LSU cant beat UGA I say that neither should. Neither one of them would've won their confrence so it makes no sense to put two teams who couldn't win their confrence.
runalex123
#59044179Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:39 PM GMT

exactly south
extemmasfriend2
#59044270Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:40 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
Southpoint
#59044384Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:42 PM GMT

I never said UGA should go to the Natty...
fruz
#59044438Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:43 PM GMT

They should even if they lose, they've had the toughest schedule in the league. And BTW LSU isn't going to lose.
extemmasfriend2
#59044462Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:43 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
runalex123
#59044512Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:44 PM GMT

@ex, okay look at it this way. (my opinion) the NCAA should look at all of the Conference champions and choose the two who should be in the Natty. If LSU loses, they shouln't be int he Natty, but i don't think Alabama should be in the Natty either
fruz
#59044517Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:44 PM GMT

@Ex If they do, I believe OSU would.
Southpoint
#59044531Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:44 PM GMT

Exteemas, exactly! Everyone would have a loss now. Making it difficult to decide. This is why the BCS is stupid. Oh BTW LSU just went 3 and out again. No First Downs on the day.
patrickbun
#59044548Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:44 PM GMT

i'm trying to say that if they have a chance to be in the NC they have to at least win their conference to be in the NC.
extemmasfriend2
#59044907Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:50 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
fruz
#59044953Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:51 PM GMT

Probably Alabama. VT might sneak in though because of a weak Stanford schedule.
123yonnd
Top 100 Poster
#59044993Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:51 PM GMT

If LSU loses. I think that LSU will drop to 2nd. Since look at the resume of OSU's season. I would take LSU over OSU anyday.
123yonnd
Top 100 Poster
#59045028Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:52 PM GMT

Fruz, VT has a weaker schedule than Stanford.
fruz
#59045151Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:53 PM GMT

Yeah, but I like VT in that case. Also, a team like Oregon or Arkansas might....but really? I hate BCS, lets just do a playoff system, something the A division did right.
extemmasfriend2
#59045327Saturday, December 03, 2011 10:56 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right