|
YOU LITTLE BLOOP BLAZING SWEET CAKE CHERRY ON TOP OF A MILKSHAKE THIS HAS BEEN WAY TO OVER SUGGESTED YOU BIG VANILLA FLAVORED WAFFLE.
100% support :3 |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
Mai thank you mr. james.
Bawmp. |
|
smashkillJoin Date: 2010-02-04
Post Count: 194 |
I say the owners should get some kind of checkbox to censor or kick swearing c: |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
It works on the fourms as well though smash. In fact, it works on every part of speech. So, what about Pms and the fourms? |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
And bump. |
|
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
I've forgot to bump this for ages. Silly me.
Bump. |
|
frittleJoin Date: 2009-05-06
Post Count: 2781 |
This is a shoe box idea that really brings the cloud with flying sheep.
I will surely support this rotten everlasting peppermint.
|
|
frittleJoin Date: 2009-05-06
Post Count: 2781 |
wait... won't this ENCOURAGE bad language? |
|
|
You clever tomato salad, didnt someone suggest this a year ago?
Im neutral on this though. |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
Yus real, me. :3
@Frittle: It'll all get changed into something you can't see, so... not really. |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
Bumping. |
|
FredfishyJoin Date: 2009-03-21
Post Count: 4197 |
Support, but that would be tricky to implement. They'd have to work out which words were verbs/adjective etc. As some are several, :/
But that would be truly awesome. |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
My thank you for the support mtr. fred.
Just as a note, I wasn't really intending for the verbs and adjectives to be seperate. If you place a bad noun in, you might end of with a preposition.
Shut the dazing up! :3
|
|
court2000Join Date: 2010-04-25
Post Count: 3066 |
Support.
Toontown has this.
Everytime you chat something bad, it says 'Ruff!' or 'meow!'...
Why not ROBLOX?
But make it with NOMNOM and DONUTS and other silly stuff!
AND ROBLOX JUST ADDED THAT ONE PERSONS 60 CHARACTER LONG SUBJECTS!
It said this when I tried to reply.
Underneath the subject:
"Subject title cannot be more than 60 characters." |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
I know. D: I want it to be 100.
Anyway, my thank you for the support miss. court. |
|
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
As a smarter mod once said to me, 'Prevention is better than consequence.' |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
Bump. |
|
|
jaceyjaceJoin Date: 2010-03-12
Post Count: 5202 |
This idea is not good.
No support.
no siggy |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
My thank you for the support jace. Oh, you didn't support? Well, I'm sorry, but you've put no legitimate reason of why not, so I'm forced by all known rules to count it as a support.
flaming: You do know how foolish they will look if they DO try to swear if intention, right?
Get away you wal-mart mother diamond-encrusting apoptosis!
See? Not only is the swearing is not seen, which is good for everyone, but they'll look like complete idiots, which *IS* how they aren't let off. |
|
jaceyjaceJoin Date: 2010-03-12
Post Count: 5202 |
Want me to say a reason?
Reason: It will be too silly.
How about this.
Cover it up with BLACK squares. |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
But then, as sacred said, 'If they have the intention to harm, they don't deserve to be let off.'
And they would be let off.
Also, it's supposed to be silly. There's more benefits to it being silly than not.
|
|
calv111Join Date: 2010-02-05
Post Count: 847 |
This would encourage cursing.
~We don't really want that, do we?~ |
|