of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

Corey089
#66962002Wednesday, April 25, 2012 3:15 PM GMT

It's just increasing the OD'ing problem. Who agrees?
RoyMer
#66962110Wednesday, April 25, 2012 3:19 PM GMT

Won't make any difference, there still is the Shaggy hair.
MadSoulStabber
#66962117Wednesday, April 25, 2012 3:19 PM GMT

Not me.
lucasbravo
#66963274Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:09 PM GMT

This goes against the "player original clothing & accessories" ideas...
TNTxERIC
#66963380Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:13 PM GMT

No support people have the right to express themselves, when you see people OD report them, if the players all looked like the 2006 players people would still OD -pointless siggy-
UltimateZombie756
#66963472Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:18 PM GMT

Agreed
[rfa#hidefromsearch]
#66964003Wednesday, April 25, 2012 4:41 PM GMT

[rfa#hidefromsearch]
cobb26
#66964783Wednesday, April 25, 2012 5:17 PM GMT

I really dont think this will make it.
Tysoncoun6
#66965243Wednesday, April 25, 2012 5:38 PM GMT

If you see people ODing why do you care. Its there lives there messing up. But still report them The Secret to making good ads is...Light Ray...
RobloxCitizen9
#66965353Wednesday, April 25, 2012 5:43 PM GMT

Read my special title :3
xXVegaXx
#66967896Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:21 PM GMT

No point. OD'ers will still OD.
ThisHatIsInsanity
#66968217Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:28 PM GMT

Guys,its the OD part that's doing it.Everybody blames the hair,but they are just people that don't have a life.It's the real OD part that matters.Not the hair.
sniper385417
#66968552Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:37 PM GMT

Eh agree Sort of. ~NHL Go Pro~
Z007
#66969063Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:49 PM GMT

NO SUPPORT. Wow. This "OD Problem" DOES NOT EXIST, IT'S CALLED A "TROLL PROBLEM". Just sayin'.
SwaggerNation
#66969133Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:50 PM GMT

Haters gonna hate ODers gonna OD. You can't stop them.
Z007
#66969140Wednesday, April 25, 2012 7:50 PM GMT

And now I'm confused. Is this "OD" a different thing from the actual "OD"? Because, it makes no sense for everyone to be jugding like that.
Z007
#66990692Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:06 AM GMT

Call me an idiot, I thought it was Over-Dosing... NOT Online You-know-what
Jammintoad
#66990837Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:08 AM GMT

umad.
VidaFrezz
#66991101Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:12 AM GMT

No. Without hair,I won't look this hot.
Andrew7711
#66992989Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:35 AM GMT

I AGREE BUT I LIKE SOME OF THE HAIR
court2000
#66994011Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:47 AM GMT

I half support. Here are two simple ROBLOX math equations: More hair = more people happy (more people buyin' R$ & BC, so that makes a HAPPY ROBLOX) And the other one is this: More hair = More OD'ers (NOT GOOD, this means a UNHAPPY ROBLOX)
Winterpwner
#66994770Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:57 AM GMT

Math Equation Hair =/= (Not equal to) Online Dating Hair = Customization Hair ∴ is good Player Actions = Possible Online Dating Online Dating =/= Hair Online Dating =/= ANYTHING BUT PLAYER ACTIONS
snakehunt
#66994896Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:59 AM GMT

Hair isn't the only problem...
Winterpwner
#66995263Thursday, April 26, 2012 2:05 AM GMT

Lots of things, but Hair DOES NOT contribute to Online Dating. Behavour does. Therefore, we need to strike where the problem lies: Online Daters. Don't remove hair; it's just another catalog item.
Zimitri
#66997397Thursday, April 26, 2012 2:40 AM GMT

Ok I see your point. But I don't think this is a good idea. I just ignore the ODers. Then they'll go bother someone else. Then she quits being a oder sooner or later if we just ignore. No Support. Sorry.

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right