of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right

LUExtremePowerDragon
#68120212Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:26 PM GMT

Introduction to Safechatting (Skip this if you know what it is) Yes Safechatting makes things "safe" for ROBLOXians under 13. But I just think ROBLOX pushed the safechatting limits too far. Like you can't post on the group wall, that seems unfair. You can't say much in game, only the things that they approve you too. You can't update your status. You can't change the name of your shirt or the description of it, this fact ticked me off. You can't comment. YOU CANT EVEN FORUM! The safechatting thing really makes ROBLOX less fun. You can barely talk to safechatters in-game. Here is my solution... Idea #1: In-Game Freedom Have a thing where you have a bunch of words (NOT PHRASES) and the safechatters can type them and chat. For example you are typing something and when you say a word thats not approved it turns red and you can't say it. The safechatters would only see chats that are like that. They wouldn't see what all of us use. Idea #2: Freedom on the Website You literally can't do anything on the website! If you read the introduction you will see that you can't really do anything. Lets change this. As in idea #1 lets give the safechatters this and put it on the website. All the things that you saw in the introduction lets use the idea from "Idea #1" and just put that on the website. For example you can post on the group wall, but you can only type approved words. Now so you don't have to waste your time just copy and paste this "tl;dr". But I'm sure some of you would read and comment. Who supports? I spent some time typing this so if you say "tl;dr" it would really be mean.
Reeddavenport
#68120333Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:27 PM GMT

Yeah. SUPPORT!!
Vareity
#68120375Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:28 PM GMT

Idea 1 is the same as toontown. They dont approve stuff so they turn them red
LUExtremePowerDragon
#68120390Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:28 PM GMT

@reed Thanks. But I bet that most people wouldn't care because they are not safechat.
Vareity
#68120423Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:29 PM GMT

Support. No tl;dr. What does that mean anyways
Reeddavenport
#68120792Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:34 PM GMT

Yeah, LU, what does tl;dr mean?
drgn42
#68121149Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:39 PM GMT

Guess why people safechat?
kiki1811
#68121230Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:41 PM GMT

I totally support your idea. Not to bring you down though, the moderators don't really care about this kind of thing. Their busy worrying about curse words that people say. I like this idea, though. :D ~Kiki1811~
rocksrolling749
#68121778Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:48 PM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
LUExtremePowerDragon
#68121986Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:51 PM GMT

tl;dr Is Too long; Didn't read
17dogmaster
#68122151Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:53 PM GMT

Support.
TwentyTwoPilots
#68123164Wednesday, May 16, 2012 12:08 AM GMT

No. It's called "Safe" for a reason. It does not need to be tampered with. ~~Why waste logic on the logicless?~~
wagnerja
#68123397Wednesday, May 16, 2012 12:11 AM GMT

No.
LUExtremePowerDragon
#68123685Wednesday, May 16, 2012 12:15 AM GMT

@Alex I would re-name it AnnoyingChatters. Its just a little too safe
LUExtremePowerDragon
#68124176Wednesday, May 16, 2012 12:22 AM GMT

Bump
BigAngryDino
#68125333Wednesday, May 16, 2012 12:37 AM GMT

[ Content Deleted ]
ifavila
#68125515Wednesday, May 16, 2012 12:39 AM GMT

"@Alex I would re-name it AnnoyingChatters. Its just a little too safe" So now safechatters are annoying? Also, I agree with alex.
TwentyTwoPilots
#68125569Wednesday, May 16, 2012 12:40 AM GMT

There's no such thing as being too safe, especially on the Internet. We do not need to tamper with the Safe-Chat system, and that's final. ~~Why waste logic on the logicless?~~
Coolwhacka
#68125654Wednesday, May 16, 2012 12:41 AM GMT

I think it should stay the same. Also when something is moderated, and it isn't too bad, perhaps there should be a "Warning 13+" or "Warning, click to open." Of course this would not apply to copyrighted content or real life pictures.
LUExtremePowerDragon
#68152480Wednesday, May 16, 2012 6:50 PM GMT

Well maybe they should change safechat to 10+ because honestly 13+ is just a little too old.
717kool
#68153364Wednesday, May 16, 2012 7:18 PM GMT

I support.
kingdestroyah
#68157015Wednesday, May 16, 2012 8:31 PM GMT

I give so much support on this.
Firebrand1
#68157768Wednesday, May 16, 2012 8:42 PM GMT

No
226611
#68160363Wednesday, May 16, 2012 9:21 PM GMT

Support, if i'm trolling as a guest i should be able to troll BETTER.... --Srsly? No.
LUExtremePowerDragon
#68163508Wednesday, May 16, 2012 10:05 PM GMT

@22 What about we keep the same thing for guests, but change actual paying players.

    of     2   
chevron_rightchevron_rightchevron_right