of     1   

skyscraper
#685212Tuesday, April 01, 2008 12:21 AM GMT

I think there should be a 2 player edit mode for people who are not so good at scripting and such. It would sure be a big help to me, because I am terrible at scripting. 1 person could make a model, the other can make a script for it and it would make the model better! Some people aren't as talented as Telamon (I'm a big fan of his work) or Zuka. I just think there should be a 2 player edit mode. Please reply, ~~skyscraper~~
Chriz
#685743Tuesday, April 01, 2008 1:27 AM GMT

And what would also be fun is... "Surprizing" your friend with a brand new GRAVITY HAMMER. Lolz. Well, GREAT idea. Just GREAT. This would also bring up "Shared Ownership"
theBloxerman64
Top 100 Poster
#686014Tuesday, April 01, 2008 2:33 AM GMT

Ya,Building in edit mode alone is kind of boring,sometimes i need a bit of company Respect The Pudding-BLOXERman AKA-The Lord Of Pudding
yi239
#686670Tuesday, April 01, 2008 7:19 AM GMT

support! i love this! im good at basic building,but when it comes to scripting... x.x
Caterator478
#688273Tuesday, April 01, 2008 8:18 PM GMT

Yeah, that's what I'm thinking. But you need to add more stuff to editing your place. IF you copylock it, you have to add in all the usernames that may come in yet still. That's alot of work. And it'll take a while until they let you check off your friends.
magikarcher
#688429Tuesday, April 01, 2008 8:41 PM GMT

That would be awesome! It would be like forge mode from Halo 3!
woof67
#688521Tuesday, April 01, 2008 8:50 PM GMT

Its a good idea, but there might be some friendships broke about it.
skyscraper
#691060Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:26 AM GMT

Yes, and that made me think- well, what if we can put in the names of the people that you would allow, the ones you trust. Then, if you have a good mind or think it through and you pick the right person(s), it would be alot better. And the actual owner of the place has more priviledges, like saving it and opening up "Insert". See, if you have a friend and he goes in and saves all these things on your place, it would really hurt your friendship if you were'nt careful. I just added these things before anything backfires.. 0.o
skyscraper
#691090Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:29 AM GMT

Shared ownership, that goes with the "You'd better pick the right person(s)" thing. If you pick the wrong person... Ouch.
wormyyy
#691272Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:44 AM GMT

yes haveing a 2 player edit mode would be the best upgrade yet and if you do that ill be come member lol
dragonking11111111
#691295Wednesday, April 02, 2008 12:46 AM GMT

It would also be a good idea to put what the person can do like he said but u pick if they can insert from the free modles and all that this is a great idea
Jamesnorrington123
#73257303Sunday, July 22, 2012 9:30 PM GMT

support
XSpwX
#73258771Sunday, July 22, 2012 9:44 PM GMT

Full support
maddie20012
#73259689Sunday, July 22, 2012 9:53 PM GMT

Stupid people, bumping old threads... But this still SHOULD be made.
XSpwX
#73260038Sunday, July 22, 2012 9:56 PM GMT

Maddie, Define "Stupid". Also just because its old doesn't mean its a bad idea.
HyperShadicXG
#73261326Sunday, July 22, 2012 10:08 PM GMT

Yeah that would be a good idea but lets make it simple how 'bout pressing the 0 + h Button To Activate 2 Player Mode Or 3 Player: p + ALT Yeeeah.
RBX_Lua
#82315809Sunday, November 18, 2012 6:55 AM GMT

@the I wish I had your top 100 poster sign
JakieMcCool
#82324674Sunday, November 18, 2012 12:12 PM GMT

A bit like KoGaMa! The only problem is, they can always start wrecking your place. And I woulden't be surprised if the tools all glitched out. What if he cut something and you pasted something, would it paste what he cut or what?
R3geBiscuit
#82325732Sunday, November 18, 2012 12:59 PM GMT

This was talked about on the blog, Shedletsky (or whoever it was, can't remember) said that giving control to which people in terms of scripting and building would be confusing.
GloriedRage
#82326712Sunday, November 18, 2012 1:30 PM GMT

Not just two players. multiple players up to the server ammount.

    of     1