chevron_leftchevron_leftchevron_left
    of     2   

Varp
#69292485Tuesday, June 05, 2012 2:50 AM GMT

It's easier to defend "Play with people who have paid money and have a stake in their account" than "Exclude anyone who's *only* paying $6/mo." There is no real difference between the people who buy BC, TBC, and OBC.
KTeddy13
#69292654Tuesday, June 05, 2012 2:54 AM GMT

Adding this will cause more chaos, no support. ~Forgive my interruption, my vision is augmented~
alivebasil
#69292765Tuesday, June 05, 2012 2:56 AM GMT

What's ROBLOX coming to? Obviously they are going to "Approve" of this because then people will spend money to buy TBC and OBC as much as BC it self. For the BC'ers I'm going to say this, what if they have a friend that is only BC and they are in a TBC game? What happens? no one gets to visit one another.
WinterFrostine1214
#69293377Tuesday, June 05, 2012 3:06 AM GMT

Kinda agree. But if we get seperated we have to talk with NBC people and we don't have to know BC/TBC/OBC epic people. I'd kinda not agree with you. ============================================================Agreeage: Right:50% Wrong 50% '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''So I am kinda/not fair.
Nox_Noxeru
#69615319Saturday, June 09, 2012 10:26 PM GMT

Well I can't really agree on the "shouldn't need/have any more BC games. I mean, look how many there are and how many have poor quality. I mean, if there's places for OBCs and TBCs to gather without BCs/TBCs/OBCs, it would create better places. I guess it's an asumption and opinion, but I'll stick to it....
HappyJippster
#69617984Saturday, June 09, 2012 11:05 PM GMT

no support a bc game is enuff and plus there would be no nbc games on the front page and people sometimes dont wana pay for membership.

chevron_leftchevron_leftchevron_left
    of     2