|
First of all, I love the WNTS, though it is missing a few things in it, such as suggesting to stop suggesting something. but, yeah, it's still cool.
now, the idea. a global trust and ranking system for forums. It's been a while since anything's been updated on the forums (for what I can tell) and I'd say it's time for an update.
tl;dr: don't be lazy, read it.
-Global Ranking System:
This is basically my idea of a "revised" top 100 poster tag. Instead of having a "top 100" or "top 50" poster badge under their forum details, it'd have their global post rank. so, someone like frozengaia would be a higher global rank than me. This would be based off of the amount of forum posts the user has, and it'd just tell other Robloxians who to trust with their posts.
-Trust system:
If a user achieves a high enough global rank, every 1 in 5 or 10 of their forum posts gets reviewed, and if it's a trustworthy* post, they get a "trust point".
Trust Points would be an accumulative detail, that regular users can't see, but Moderators and above can. Basically, if they get 50-100 Trust Points they get a badge, as well as their global rank, which says "Trusted Poster"
*Trustworthiness is defined by spelling and grammar, logicality, and size and relevance of their post. i.e if they have impeccable grammar, but horrible spelling, they might not get a trust point. similarly, if they have perfect spelling and horrible grammar, they might not.
also, size and relevance of the post as determined by 2 things: if their post has a direct quote from someone else, that won't go towards the size factor, but if it's all their own words, that will. If their post is relevant to the topic being discussed or the original topic, then they'd have a better chance of getting a trust point.
Give me your ideas and feedback, if you say no support, please fo thr love of Shedletsky give a reason for it. |
|
snakehuntJoin Date: 2009-06-22
Post Count: 34463 |
I dont support the trust system....
Global ranking sounds good. |
|
|
I just thought of a flaming issue due to global rank, and then a solution for it.
If someone is busted for flaming someone for any reason whatsoever, they instantly drop a rank or more and earn a temporary ban |
|
|
Well done! You have my support. |
|
|
Bump, thanks for the support guys! |
|
|
Most people are prejudice to what people say through the ammount of forum posts they have.
Aswell as their join date.
I feel this will only make things worse and might be used as a 'bragging' tool.
So no support. |
|
|
188809Join Date: 2011-07-14
Post Count: 510 |
Yes on global ranking.
no on trust system. |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
I agree on what most people are saying.
But, trust system? I like it, but...
How can a computer magically tell those things? |
|
SwordismJoin Date: 2011-12-07
Post Count: 4835 |
Very well done, but what if someone's account is PGed? *cough* mine *cough*
Will they have to start over or will the mods realize that they're who they say they are?
Anyways, I think the new badges also sound good.
You have my support.
-Torpedo17 |
|
|
@frozen it'd be a human, duh
@Swordism I guess you'd send them an email saying that your old account was PGed and that you've started on a new account, and give them the name and pass or something |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
Rp:
The chance of a human MODERATING even THAT,
is so slim.
IMAGINE how much they would have to go though!
Also, crititist differentiation.
I'd be harder than say... you. :3 |
|
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
Critist differentiation.
Example:
A place. It has some trees and a park.
Two people of the same tastes rate it.
person 1 likes it a lot. 5/5 from him.
person 2 likes it, but doesn't love it... 3/5 from him.
Same place, but different people have different ideas of what a good place is. And those ideas can be harder to impress.
person 1 may call grammar "Understandable."
person 2 may call grammar "Absolutely perfect spelling and punctuation, no fractions whatsoever, and understandable."
Get it? |
|
|
ah, yeah, then I believe the words you were looking for are "critical viewpoints"
but yes, I see your point. maybe a more generalised standard then, understandable grammar and spelling |
|
|
xXVegaXxJoin Date: 2011-10-26
Post Count: 7370 |
I don't really like the trust system.
But great idea on the global ranking system. |
|
|
The trust system sounds nearly impossible to work out, but I think everything else is completely doable.
~~ My mouse is bipolar. D: ~~ |
|
|
obligatory bump + thanks for semi supports too! |
|
|
it's time for a daily bump! |
|
|
Bump for the second-last time |
|