|
Q: "Read WNTS" -MasterChiefAlpha and other people think this thread violating it
A: "Yeah I know, more NBC rights cannot be suggested due to WNTS. However, this is ROBLOX's promise.(Thats the loophole of this) This suggestion isn't for more NBC rights but for making ROBLOX's promise come real, unless you say the following in WNTS: What ROBLOX told is a LIE and won't come real, you cannot suggest roblox's promise." |
|
|
I think this is a pathedic idea. Why do you think ROBLOX will suddenly go down the tubes just because NBCers don't get those worthless packages? How could that take from them even a single dollar!? I think it gives them MORE money to modivate them about BC! How would giving NBCs packages do anything good at all? |
|
|
|
Quote ballofwhacks Posted: 01-25-2013 06:15 PM
"I think this is a pathedic idea. Why do you think ROBLOX will suddenly go down the tubes just because NBCers don't get those worthless packages? How could that take from them even a single dollar!? I think it gives them MORE money to modivate them about BC! How would giving NBCs packages do anything good at all? "
This idea is NOT pathedic at all.
ROBLOX will lose income from the potential BC/TBC/OBC buyers NOT suddenly, but EVENTUALLY. Did you read the thread thoroughly? I think you didn't.
Also, this is ROBLOX's promise, lying to be very bad, so thats why players will quit if ROBLOX don't make the promise come true, 'Nuff said. |
|
|
NO PACKAGES JUST MORE TIX THATS IT |
|
|
I'm with Telamon. NO NBC RIGHTS! This is just more incentive to get bc. |
|
|
@orangebaron
If roblox didn't promised this, then it is a incentive to get BC.
However, ROBLOX DID promised this!!(It means if roblox don't make this promise comes real, then it is an 'incentive' to make players quit!)
I want to stand on your side, but I cannot!! Why? Since roblox promised this!! |
|
|
Roblox 1.0: One of the best for free
iBot: Costs 99 cents.
Buy BC: It's 7 bucks
~ The WNTS Police ~ |
|
|
Q: "You want packages? Buy BC."
A: "Yes, I realize you can just buy BC to buy them. But, does that make it okay for roblox to lie? Does that make it so no customers/NBC will quit because of roblox lying? Absolutely not!"
that answered your point. |
|
|
CrazcJoin Date: 2009-08-29
Post Count: 11834 |
[ Content Deleted ] |
|
|
@Crazc,
Lolno, lots more then just 200 will leave. |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
I've already stated my opinion and it's sort of been satisfactionally answered so I don't have a right to crtisize this again, but can I ask something?
@Derek/everyone who says roblox promised bodies:
Yes, they did promise it.
But how do you remember that!?
...Okay, my attempts to derail it by saying that Derek didn't even have an account when the blog "promise" came out, which he did and does, is failing. Woot. POO YOU JOIN
But still.
How do you remember a very flimsy comment they may or may not even remember anymore that was posted two years ago that people only care about on S&I!?
I wish I had that idetic memory. >:U.
But I will say one thing:
"Lolno, lots more then just 200 will leave."
Roblox logic 101- If they would leave because they don't have packages, then that means they aren't worth the effort trying to save.
Roblox doesn't care that > 200 people approx will leave because of a pedantic memory.
It has 6 million more. It's fine. They'll be replaced by more loyal and logical-thinking people.
I could even assume that the only reason you're complaining is because you were there when the packages were made, opposed to joining and taking packages as BC only for granted.
If you promise to kill someone, in your logic it is then alright and mandatory to kill that person.
Logic must be universal. |
|
|
@Frozen,
Yes, it won't damage ROBLOX much if 200 people leave (NBC), but what IF roblox fulfilled its promises, and then, the NBC might buy a type of BC such as OBC? If 200 NBC bought OBC because of knowing ROBLOX won't lie (The user's parents) then that will be Big Money.
But it'll still be good money if they buy BC, or TBC as well. |
|
|
lol packages are ugly. roblox girl is already for you. Honestly, people never even wear packages right. Everyone uses short sleeved shirts which mkes them look like they have deformed wrists. |
|
EspithelJoin Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917 |
People don't think like that, spooky. |
|
|
CrazcJoin Date: 2009-08-29
Post Count: 11834 |
[ Content Deleted ] |
|
|
@frozengaia
I've already stated my opinion and it's sort of been satisfactionally answered so I don't have a right to crtisize this again, but can I ask something?
"@Derek/everyone who says roblox promised bodies:
Yes, they did promise it.
But how do you remember that!?
...Okay, my attempts to derail it by saying that Derek didn't even have an account when the blog "promise" came out, which he did and does, is failing. Woot. POO YOU JOIN"
It is NOT related to "omg that person didnt have an account when roblox's promise came out!!" Anyway, I can just view the history(the old blog entry) of roblox, and I realised it
"But still.
How do you remember a very flimsy comment they may or may not even remember anymore that was posted two years ago that people only care about on S&I!?
I wish I had that eidetic memory. >:U."
If one person remembers it, others will recognise it, just like XiaoXiaoMan remembers Telamon asked 'What is your opinion on making SFOTH BC only?'(of course, that post has been hidden, but he made a video about it and it is on youtube atm)
"But I will say one thing:
'Lolno, lots more then just 200 will leave.'
Roblox logic 101- If they would leave because they don't have packages, then that means they aren't worth the effort trying to save."
Since many robloxians don't know about the fact that packages should be NBC, they just think that there is NO problem that only BCers can get packages, what a pendatic mind.
"Roblox doesn't care that > 200 people approx will leave because of a pedantic memory.
It has 6 million more. It's fine. They'll be replaced by more loyal and logical-thinking people."
If I view "Roblox doesn't care that > 200 people approx" in mathematics, then your point failed: since 6000000 > 200, the inequality holds true even if it is in this case.
"I could even assume that the only reason you're complaining is because you were there when the packages were made, opposed to joining and taking packages as BC only for granted."
I could even assune that you are the only person(or some more) to have pedantic mind, because according to your logic, you nullify the problems even they are TOO OBVIOUS, like you will see there are NO problems of FAKE TITLES.
"If you promise to kill someone, in your logic it is then alright and mandatory to kill that person.
Logic must be universal."
Your comparison is HIGHLY INvaild. You cannot compare the lie with crime. Lie offends the ethic, but if you offends a crime, you will be sued then sentenced by the court.
That's the end. Thanks for your opinions.
~如果你的主意是可行的，我會給予支持。~ |
|
|
@Crazc
one of my points answered your question :P |
|
|
|
|
|
|