watevs44
#79480018Friday, October 05, 2012 4:33 PM GMT

Triforce, I can't take anything that's INVALID. That's what your whole argument is. Try again. !Dream Crusher Strikes Again:3
Espithel
#79480043Friday, October 05, 2012 4:34 PM GMT

Want to change his marginally ignorant responce? Tell him why you don't support. It's that simple. We're both only getting onto you is because it's explicit that you have some form of text that watevs can improve his idea with.
Triforce778
#79480120Friday, October 05, 2012 4:36 PM GMT

>I can't take anything that's INVALID. Exactly. One does not simply change something.
Triforce778
#79480144Friday, October 05, 2012 4:37 PM GMT

And here's something else for you to read: The more you feed me, the more the flame war is fueled. It's common sence. You might as well close the thread, dammit.
Espithel
#79480188Friday, October 05, 2012 4:38 PM GMT

It's not really a flame war. It's more of a one-sided interrogation. Now. tell us why you don't support. We're being really blunt here.
Triforce778
#79480225Friday, October 05, 2012 4:40 PM GMT

>Now. tell us why you don't support. It's past the point where I don't give a crap to why I don't support. So, you cannot squeeze it out of me.
Espithel
#79480351Friday, October 05, 2012 4:44 PM GMT

Then three things occur: A) Because you do not have a reason for not supporting, your arguement is invalid. B) Because your arguement is thus invalid, we can thus declare the polar opposite arguement valid; which we have done. C) Because we have declared the opposite arguement valid, which is that you support, we can then in every logical right declare two things: D) Ask you to give a reason, E) Have the last say.
Triforce778
#79480383Friday, October 05, 2012 4:45 PM GMT

>arguement Great spelling here, guys.
Espithel
#79480514Friday, October 05, 2012 4:50 PM GMT

Please do excuse my error there. Anyhoo, seeing that was the only form of reaction was so... Yep. I could declare my point to have validity, as there was no reaction against it...
watevs44
#79480566Friday, October 05, 2012 4:52 PM GMT

Triforce, When you wanna try again, foruming logically, efficiently and validly, give us a call. !Dream Crusher Strikes Again:3
watevs44
#79481402Friday, October 05, 2012 5:20 PM GMT

Mmmm, I love the taste of Supports. Anyway, time to bump. !Dream Crusher Strikes Again:3
Espithel
#79481463Friday, October 05, 2012 5:22 PM GMT

What do supports taste like?
NateDawggy
#79481478Friday, October 05, 2012 5:22 PM GMT

Support. Logic + Grammar + Troll = Me
Triforce778
#79481485Friday, October 05, 2012 5:22 PM GMT

They probably taste like failure.
Espithel
#79481570Friday, October 05, 2012 5:24 PM GMT

If you've got nothing worthwhile to say tri, You might as well just leave the thread. You're explicitly trying to waste time.
Triforce778
#79481598Friday, October 05, 2012 5:25 PM GMT

I sure am.
Espithel
#79481619Friday, October 05, 2012 5:26 PM GMT

Well, I have all the time in the world. :3
Triforce778
#79481764Friday, October 05, 2012 5:31 PM GMT

Lucky! D:<
watevs44
#79481776Friday, October 05, 2012 5:31 PM GMT

Triforce, It's okay, you've already supported. You can go now. !Dream Crusher Strikes Again:3
Triforce778
#79481810Friday, October 05, 2012 5:32 PM GMT

.....*poker face*.......
Espithel
#79481977Friday, October 05, 2012 5:37 PM GMT

CAN'T DENY, CAN'T DENY, THAT I'VE REALLY GOT A POKER FACE............... Meh, this has now turned into a chatroom. :D
Triforce778
#79482233Friday, October 05, 2012 5:45 PM GMT

*Reads my little dashie* What... What have I just read? ITS SO SAD!!! D:>
fastepiceric
#79486762Friday, October 05, 2012 7:29 PM GMT

support.
NoobTubeToday
#79487802Friday, October 05, 2012 7:47 PM GMT

I support
Keyumi
#79488177Friday, October 05, 2012 7:53 PM GMT

Support.