"Next ban punishment"

Join Date: 2008-10-28
Post Count: 8671

#80503724Sunday, October 21, 2012 1:09 AM GMT

SUPPORT. I WANT THIS D:

Join Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917

#80528796Sunday, October 21, 2012 8:57 AM GMT

My thank you for supporting mr. pokemon, mr. katsui and mtr. mikkel. On another note, thanks for making me feel I have no life and forum on the forums all day long kat. :D

TheDankDorito

Join Date: 2011-10-24
Post Count: 507

#80550417Sunday, October 21, 2012 5:16 PM GMT

support

rigbyxx

Join Date: 2011-09-29
Post Count: 67

#80550609Sunday, October 21, 2012 5:19 PM GMT

Support.

ZZ9PluralZAlpha

Join Date: 2008-06-08
Post Count: 879

#80550642Sunday, October 21, 2012 5:19 PM GMT

SUPPORT THE CRAP OUT OF IT!

paintballzombiedude

Join Date: 2009-07-16
Post Count: 13541

#80551574Sunday, October 21, 2012 5:32 PM GMT

"SUPPORT THE CRAP OUT OF IT" Grammar, you unintelligent fool.

Espithel

Join Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917

#80551902Sunday, October 21, 2012 5:36 PM GMT

@Paintball: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA FUFUFUFUFUFUFUFUFU LOLOLOLOL ROFLROFLROFLROFL THE IRONY! THE IRONY! ENCORE! ENCORE! -Your reply was not correct in a sense of grammar either, because it was a minor. Rule 21 doesn't exist, so you might aswell stop being idiots and actually stay on topic and prefectionately and ironically causing non-existant affects whilst pointing out every single error in people's typing. If you're going to be a grammar fan, do it properly please.

paintballzombiedude

Join Date: 2009-07-16
Post Count: 13541

#80552114Sunday, October 21, 2012 5:39 PM GMT

@frozen I'm not a grammar fan, but all I see that guy LEGO, do is annoy people about their grammar, and then he messed up. I couldn't help myself. And I support. :)

Espithel

Join Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917

#80552409Sunday, October 21, 2012 5:43 PM GMT

-Oh. -Ah well, join the club. ;3 But my thank you for the support mr. lego, mr. paint and mr. rig. Also mr. eg. Bawmp.

cobalt10

Join Date: 2008-07-21
Post Count: 7371

#80552691Sunday, October 21, 2012 5:46 PM GMT

Not sure if this has been posted before, but this is one of those rare cases where I'm too lazy to read the thread. Anyway: The problem with this is that it can't actually happen. Bans aren't calculated solely on the number of bans, reminders, and warnings you've had. It counts the number in total you have, the number of recent bans, the date of your last ban/reminder, and what type of infraction occurred in addition to its severity. At least, to my knowledge (which usually isn't that far from the truth, if not exact), this is how it's done. And it makes sense, too, considering I've yet to exceed a 3 day ban even after at least 20 actions against me. To get an accurate approximation they'd require a tool that would look at your entire ban history, and calculate all that data, also ignoring that a moderator could easily choose to levy a different ban time regardless of previous actions. But, whatever. I guess, if ROBLOX really wanted to, they could do this. Though I'm certain it wouldn't be accurate at all. ~ Ivegottogodosomething!

Espithel

Join Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917

#80553207Sunday, October 21, 2012 5:52 PM GMT

I could happen for a variety of reasons that I have carefully added into the thread, cobalt. First of all, the word least. Second of all, the second suggestion. Third of all: I am STILL certain the moderation process is done by bots. The bots determine what needs banning, the banning is done by the mods. Fourth of all: Because I was on an xbox, I couldn't type a lot, so I was lazy aswell. A part I missed was: "The approximation will be altered per the calculations of the banning system. You can view what the next ban will at least be in the account badge, and when you get banned assuming that you get banned every 3 months."

Espithel

Join Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917

#81207035Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:16 PM GMT

And bump.

GreenShaman

Join Date: 2010-08-06
Post Count: 18049

#81207111Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:18 PM GMT

support.

XxDesertxX

Join Date: 2008-04-09
Post Count: 192

#81207325Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:23 PM GMT

Support

EpiczzEddy

Join Date: 2012-01-13
Post Count: 1033

#81207385Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:25 PM GMT

Support.

NoahWoah

Join Date: 2009-12-15
Post Count: 2144

#81208016Wednesday, October 31, 2012 6:41 PM GMT

How can the mods know how serious the person will do that offence again? Let's say a noob was banned for spamming. It says that the next time he spams he will be banned for 1 day. Then he spams at least 1 million spam comments on every item on the front page of the Catalog. Then he thinks that he will be banned for 1 day and then he finds that he got banned for 2 weeks! So no support.

Espithel

Join Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917

#81255269Thursday, November 01, 2012 2:13 PM GMT

@Noah: It's amazing how a single word (or lack of noticing thereof) can make an entire opinion. You have cleary not noticed a magical word I used: The word (or phrase.) "at least." But my thank you for supporting mr. everyone else.

Dandelion212

Join Date: 2008-09-28
Post Count: 9847

#81255735Thursday, November 01, 2012 2:36 PM GMT

No, bans/warnings/reminders/poisons/terminations are given out based on severity. It wouldn't be right if someone got a warning for spamming, it said their next would be a 1-day'er, then they swore a bunch, and still only got a 1-day ban.

Espithel

Join Date: 2009-10-09
Post Count: 20917

#81256737Thursday, November 01, 2012 3:30 PM GMT

@Dandelion: Did you read the reply above you? "at least." Please, people. Learn to read... .-. -... Sorry, that sounded a little bit rude. But still. If the ignorance of two words is all it takes for people to make a completely idiotic move, I really should start overstating every single minor detail.