of     1   

GalenLP
#87586342Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:05 AM GMT

Allies exist, but ever wanted a system to communicate to your allies? This feature adds 2 extra check box's to the rank systems, 1 saying "Can see allies", which is required for the other to work, and the other one saying "Allies admin". Check Can See Allies, and you get a new tab, next to shops, theres a tab that says "Alliances". It then, goes to a page, in which has no official owner, but a list of groups in the alliance. It also has a list of Alliance HR's, or admins. The admins have control over the shout, whether to break THERE GROUP from the alliance, etc. Naming the alliance is easy, the person first, next to an allie on the allies list for normal group Admin, selects "Form Alliance". It then goes to a page for like creating a group, only its making an alliance. After the alliance is made, you are made an Admin, for there is no owner. The Description is updatable by admins, the name is not, and the logo is not. If theres less than 2 groups in the Alliance, the alliance admins are sent a message saying "Alliance Ended", and in the body of the message, saying "[ Name ] has ended due to all groups breaking off". It then, deletes the alliance. - Add onto the idea if you want, hows it sound?
Sonic5479
#87587537Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:16 AM GMT

Support.
Zathog
#87588240Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:23 AM GMT

It's called a union, and people already do this. -_-
GalenLP
#87590994Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:50 AM GMT

@Chuck: Read the damn post before replying, not the title only.
Zathog
#87591503Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:55 AM GMT

I did, and it is simply a watered-down explanation of unions. By the way, no group owner? Perfect idea, not even going to start explaining the many negative repercussions of that. -_-
blakejm
#87591696Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:57 AM GMT

Support. I have a question though. Why is it EVERY player that joined in december has BC?
GalenLP
#87591715Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:57 AM GMT

Is there a feature for Unions? No. This feature brings alliance chat, and shouts, without having to join Multiple groups. No owner, because its not a dicatorship. To end it, easily just break away from the alliance. Name the cons, and the pro's.
GalenLP
#87591777Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:58 AM GMT

@Blake: Christmas, plus, i made this account so i could get away from the nubs stalking me on my other account. Many more did the same thing for the same reason, or bought without thinking first.
blakejm
#87591871Wednesday, January 23, 2013 12:59 AM GMT

Sure.
Zathog
#87592296Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:03 AM GMT

There is no need for a union feature. Some group prefer a union, others don't, that is up to the group leader. Also, implying everyone will be mature about this. Say one ally gets mad at another, starts raging, refuses to leave, etc. The point of a group owner is to control the members. -_-
GalenLP
#87594107Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:20 AM GMT

"There is no need for a union feature. Some group prefer a union, others don't, that is up to the group leader." - If you read, this was NOT REQUIRED, there's a button that ACTIVATES IT. "Also, implying everyone will be mature about this." - What does everyone being mature have to do with anything? "Say one ally gets mad at another, starts raging, refuses to leave, etc." - Demote if its your group, or break the alliance, which removes the alliance tab, but does not unally. "The point of a group owner is to control the members. -_-" - Plus, its not a group owner sort of thing, its a feature that lets Alliances communicate.
BungholeOnFleek
#87598237Wednesday, January 23, 2013 2:02 AM GMT

Support, seems nice.
court2000
#87602750Wednesday, January 23, 2013 2:50 AM GMT

I support. It could help for war groups and stuff. Or school groups. Or any groups. Support.
Vozha
#87604101Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:05 AM GMT

Very nice idea! Support

    of     1