of     1   

AvatarofNemesis
#88032198Tuesday, January 29, 2013 1:37 AM GMT

There should be an unlimited server option, I miss out on nearly all clan events due to stupid server limits and can't even attend a single epic battle.
Keyumi
#88032364Tuesday, January 29, 2013 1:39 AM GMT

Yes, if you're willing to pay for them. Why don't you ask your clan to expand the PlayerLimit?
mathepa
#88032748Tuesday, January 29, 2013 1:43 AM GMT

@Special The point of the mega server feature is so that roblox can be constantly raising the server limit. Their main goal is to make that feature enable 100 player servers. @Bvalere he is in a superclan. They could have like 70 members attending depending on the day and the activity level...
AvatarofNemesis
#88032856Tuesday, January 29, 2013 1:44 AM GMT

I am talking about unlimited PLAYERS in servers not the servers themselves.
AvatarofNemesis
#88032966Tuesday, January 29, 2013 1:45 AM GMT

For example 1 server able to hold 100 players.
Keyumi
#88033009Tuesday, January 29, 2013 1:45 AM GMT

@mathepa Oh, I didn't manage to catch that. ..Huh...have you ever considered, leaving a clan before...because this would make a response a whole less presumptuous.
mathepa
#88033135Tuesday, January 29, 2013 1:47 AM GMT

unlimited would be nearly impossible (the average front page game usually has around 1500K+ people playing the game). 100 or 200 player servers would be great editions to roblox though, would improve on your problem, would improve on lag itself, etc...
Keyumi
#88033585Tuesday, January 29, 2013 1:52 AM GMT

@mathepa They did attempt to grasp about 100 users in one server back when GameTest was online. Not sure if they got that far however, but it did manage...to some degree.. Others would consider leaving after joining due to a lapse in their connections. If we had servers such as those, I can only imagine how many users would waltz right into the game only to get disconnected.
TooMuchGibberish
#88033688Tuesday, January 29, 2013 1:53 AM GMT

On the average PC, you would get about 80-100% more lag on popular games.
mathepa
#88033836Tuesday, January 29, 2013 1:55 AM GMT

Bvalere They still do those tests :P This project has been going on for years (I tested the original kickoff place to this feature). the 100 players was a year ago, it was pretty laggy. But since then they have created terrain and featherlight bricks. It could be very well possible nowadays as they continue to improve the bricks and tweak the engine.
Keyumi
#88034604Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:04 AM GMT

@mathepa Ah, I see. I figured they would've let this go considering the possibility of even achieving a user-count of 100, all active on one server. I suppose the featherlight bricks give a larger opportunity now that they were introduced it to us. Though, it may strain to have a large number of users all gathered in one social domain....chatting miscellaneously... tripping and falling and getting squeezed beside multiple users when playing mini games.. I expect much to come for this feature. Most utterly overwhelming in gameplay.
mathepa
#88091681Wednesday, January 30, 2013 12:49 AM GMT

I wish they would let classic pick from 6 - 30 players and mega place pick from 40 - 100 users if this happens :P It would be silly to have the choice of 6 - 20, 100

    of     1