|
Well, I am trying to get in this FB with TRA, but some people say no.
I am posting this on C&G to get your thoughts on if I should be in this FB. TRAs side. |
|
|
Would TRA be likely to win if I was in their side in this Final Battle? |
|
|
|
no be on our side. the BETTER side. |
|
DravumJoin Date: 2009-03-25
Post Count: 28399 |
Lol. TRA will lose the FB. No doubt.
-\By the definition of perpendicular-\ |
|
|
oo7killJoin Date: 2009-08-02
Post Count: 9892 |
Lol, i want to be in Fb for rat. Then we have a chance of winning. |
|
thok1599Join Date: 2008-06-29
Post Count: 22519 |
FB? |
|
|
WHo's on your final battle team? you'd have to be a lot better than someone in order to replace them |
|
fl_axJoin Date: 2010-01-23
Post Count: 3514 |
TRA currently has the upper hand in the FB, so RAT will probably lose.
TRA is getting more lives, unless RAT can pull ahead in raid wins.
according to science |
|
|
|
@Groovy,
We aren't like MOST groups,
You must be in TRA elites to qualify for the Final Battle. |
|
|
if i were in the FB
RAT would loose
because im that good |
|
|
@flax, it's true that TRA may obtain more lives due to the abundance of raiding victories (Part of the wartime ordeal); however, you must still take into account that RAT's FB team could more than likely crush any FB team TRA could muster up... well, in my perspective. Which is why I believe the war and the rules thereof was issued so suddenly - DrDr's apparent fear of having to face RAT in a final battle. |
|
SpySapperJoin Date: 2012-07-04
Post Count: 8184 |
[ Content Deleted ] |
|
fl_axJoin Date: 2010-01-23
Post Count: 3514 |
TRA actually ins't that terrible... so you never know.
Sometimes they dissapoint, sometimes they surprise.
according to science |
|
trung39Join Date: 2011-12-31
Post Count: 1975 |
RAT has a former VAK General. Heil |
|
|
oo7killJoin Date: 2009-08-02
Post Count: 9892 |
Do the math, you exploited for about half of your wins Tra. So we get more lives. DO TEH MATH d o t h e m a t h DoTheMath dOtHeMaTh !¬!!!!!" |
|