|
|
|
I'd have to lean to no-merge. FCO is more strict, with formations and such and meetings and training. There is a bit too much contrast between eachother.
"A word to the wise ain't necessary - it's the stupid ones that need the advice." |
|
|
|
Merge is winning by a bit right now, I believe. |
|
NickyJ3Join Date: 2011-12-23
Post Count: 3563 |
No-merge. |
|
|
|
|
beloxyJoin Date: 2010-08-14
Post Count: 2800 |
Merge. |
|
|
RatiowiseJoin Date: 2012-05-18
Post Count: 10264 |
No-Merge. FEAR is better when they suk more.
"It is during our darkest moments that we must focus to see the light."
-Aristotle Onassis |
|
bakugan11Join Date: 2008-08-13
Post Count: 932 |
FiD is always being tossed around, merge it into FCO. |
|
|
|
Merge, it will get more things done. |
|
Redsoxs4Join Date: 2011-06-15
Post Count: 17324 |
No Merge! |
|
HD188753Join Date: 2012-06-13
Post Count: 5021 |
Merge, but put FiD under FCO. |
|
|
Merge -- I believe it will be beneficial to both sides. Black ops(Covert ops) are controlled by the U.S. CIA extremely well, so I see the two groups doing the same. |
|
StrongXVJoin Date: 2011-11-02
Post Count: 1489 |
No-Merge, FiD stores intel, FCO can gather it, and fights well. |
|
StrongXVJoin Date: 2011-11-02
Post Count: 1489 |
If you merge FCO and FiD, then where would the FCO trainings go? FCO trainings are strict, and you are disciplined to be good. If they merge, then trainings would go. |
|
|
|
No merge.
~I'm not the con, but the acon.~ |
|
|
|
|
no merge.
Fid is much more different than Fco. |
|