Badept
#98476487Thursday, May 23, 2013 12:48 AM GMT

so, in theory, you want one person, to take away RAP from every day items... ok.
AccessibleMrStealth
#98478291Thursday, May 23, 2013 1:04 AM GMT

@More Notice how new limiteds they release have more copies? That's because people can own multiple. And 1 person COULD take away RAP from any item before they had this feature. Anyways, people are entitled to whatever limiteds they want. If they have enough money to buy up an entire supply of a limited, then good for them for getting that money. People should be able to do what they want with their robux.
Airboren
#98479344Thursday, May 23, 2013 1:14 AM GMT

Support, we sued Bill Gates, we can control Merely. Monopolies are bad, If ROBLOX wants to bring in a real economy, support this!
INSANlC
#98480005Thursday, May 23, 2013 1:19 AM GMT

Rich people became rich with effort, why don't you do the same? NO support. Dᴏ ʏᴏᴜ ᴇᴠᴇɴ ʟɪғᴛ?
Airboren
#98480845Thursday, May 23, 2013 1:27 AM GMT

Nah, rich people just become rich in understanding the market, or abusing it. No real effort there :P
AccessibleMrStealth
#98481055Thursday, May 23, 2013 1:28 AM GMT

@Air Then are you rich?
Badept
#98693759Saturday, May 25, 2013 3:11 AM GMT

Nope. :P
monkrymonkry
#98699258Saturday, May 25, 2013 4:00 AM GMT

but i wouldnt have 13 LOL santas D:
databrain
#98701506Saturday, May 25, 2013 4:24 AM GMT

Limiteds go by way too fast! I sooooo want this!
Badept
#98709657Saturday, May 25, 2013 6:19 AM GMT

hi monkry, nice to see you stalking my threads.
databrain
#99098885Tuesday, May 28, 2013 1:31 AM GMT

BRUUMMPPPPPPPPP Emerson wrote an essay on that
Iamawesom
#99107695Tuesday, May 28, 2013 2:44 AM GMT

No support, no one can monopoly the limiteds, people sell for so much, to make a profit the price would be way to high, and no one will buy. Merely is smart enough to save incase a very expenive limited comes out, if he monopolizes, he cant buy limiteds worth 50k robux.
Badept
#99338013Thursday, May 30, 2013 1:44 AM GMT

Eh... More or less?
databrain
#99396661Thursday, May 30, 2013 5:00 PM GMT

All the limiteds I see go by within the same half-hour they were put on sale. This is madness. Emerson wrote an essay on that
RubiksCubix
#99400622Thursday, May 30, 2013 5:49 PM GMT

Badept
#99542381Friday, May 31, 2013 10:55 PM GMT

rubix, people creating monopolies would ruin it. the limit would prevent that.
databrain
#99543256Friday, May 31, 2013 11:03 PM GMT

This wont ruin the economy. Roblox survived before this was added.
Badept
#99564765Saturday, June 01, 2013 2:22 AM GMT

It survived before, because of the fact that everyone could only have ONE copy, and so the general owners could work out where supply and demand meet. But now, One person can do that, and set the prices VERY high... and make limiteds WAY more than their worth, which would crash the economy, more or less.
Airboren
#99565715Saturday, June 01, 2013 2:30 AM GMT

I could easily become rich, but ROBLOX isn't the place to :P
Badept
#99570474Saturday, June 01, 2013 3:12 AM GMT

Ok then. Unrelated comments.
electricslide
#99570920Saturday, June 01, 2013 3:16 AM GMT

This idea is hideous.
FierceAsTheFire
#99571899Saturday, June 01, 2013 3:24 AM GMT

ROBLOX is a free game where people can buy as many limiteds as they want. I do not support this idea because it seems not fair and unjust to the community.
databrain
#99608983Saturday, June 01, 2013 1:46 PM GMT

Buying all the limiteds is unjust to the community. Emerson wrote an essay on that
FierceAsTheFire
#99671567Saturday, June 01, 2013 10:20 PM GMT

I didnt say that. Im trying to state that its not fair to put a control on how many limiteds you have. It is a first come first serve basis. And also are you trying o make fun of me???
Badept
#99700339Sunday, June 02, 2013 1:42 AM GMT

burning, data was talking about the post above him, not you...