|
Ah, the issue itself is not necessarily gender-specific.
The actual problem arises from the fact that each individual's perception and personality varies significantly from another human's perception.
Gender does, however, affect certain stereotypical views that dominate social interaction to the degree of altering Quality-Of-Life.
Nevertheless, It's unreasonable to the maximum extent for any member of either gender to generalize every person in the specified category as having the exact sa... |
|
|
Hmm? Web-Oriented careers are flourishing under the correct circumstances.
Also, why do you need to inform an individual at a social gathering of your employment choice? It's not something to be disgraced by, rather, It's quite positive that you're capable of moderating a forum oriented towards younger audiences. |
|
|
"@Anon
Because apparently, they get enough attention in real life, Social Rejects."
Well, voluntary reclusion can be very beneficial when utilized temporarily. |
|
|
"WHY DO YOU LET YOURSELF BE AN EASY TARGET FOR PEOPLE"
Although the following statements may appear as patronizing or otherwise negative, I'm not trying to insult you, I'm merely trying to help you rationalize the situation.
In society, 'acceptance' is a necessary aspect beginning from the very critical durations of cognitive development, failure to feel accepted by other individuals has some degree of influence on your psychological state, though this varies on an individual basis.
These ot... |
|
|
Absolutely.
Adolescents should be more focused on their cognitive development in areas such as academic knowledge rather than futile "Social" relationships that will likely be insignificant later and enforce the individual with the emotional stability of another person. |
|
|
You aren't inferior to your friend whatsoever.
Each individual varies in personality characteristics from another person, I'm certain that you have plenty of positive and beneficial characteristics without having to conform to the social standards of another adolescent.
It's much better to divide yourself from the psychological entrapment of a clique than it is to allow yourself to become attached to something that could eventually damage your social perception of other humans when negativity ... |
|
|
'You are right Anony but it seems I can't post without being attacked.'
It usually takes a varying amount of time before the individual can become more adept at handling an unfamiliar environment.
Intervals between using the website is an efficient method for focusing on something else without allowing the "Toxic" individuals to influence your perception of social interaction negatively on a greater scale.
This type of reaction happens to the majority of us. |
|
|
What exactly are you accomplishing by "spying" on other users? The users in other Sub-Sections are preoccupied with their own social circle. |
|
|
That wasn't very kind at all.
This individual likely considered himself as being a member of your Social-Circle and this will likely have a lasting psychological effect on the person. |
|
|
You've created a web of deception and now you're suffering from the effects of your actions.
There's very few individuals capable of formulating their strategy well enough to avoid ruining their own plans when it comes to things such as this.
Explain the situation to the individuals involved and genuinely apologize if you are guilty for your "Crimes".
Also, if you cannot manage a simple "romantic" relationship without resorting to such tactics, how do you intend to maintain honesty in the Emp... |
|
|
"I know the psychological, social and ethical implications of a teacher following a minor on twitter. The joke is that it's a cultural reference and completely abhorrent behavior when taking the matter seriously. This is how jokes work."
Perhaps we simply perceive what can be considered as a "Joke" differently? It's certainly true that components of repulsive subjects can be viewed in a "Humorous" manner when approached in an "acceptable" way, yet it is also crucial to recognize that said accep... |
|
|
Understandably, I can recognize that our varying perceptions of social interaction may cause you to become irritated due to my responses.
Still, I'm not certain as to why you would become upset enough to make a thread stating for me to cease using the Sub-Section. |
|
|
Self-gratification is the essential component.
Placing individuals on a scale of wealthiness and privileges leads directly to this type of behavior.
The condescending individuals are often the ones suffering from internal psychological conflict and consistent worry over aspects such as financial sustainability and control over common civilians and thus they resort to patronizing those in a more minimal position to remind themselves of their abilities.
Social-Psychology can explain the majorit... |
|
|
Learning should be a more crucial motivational factor than any potential social benefits. |
|
|
The individuals of the Off-Topic Sub-Section are apparently somewhat more aggressive than users within the boundaries of this Sub-Section.
Although, that's simply due to social influence. |
|
|
Although I'm unaware of the circumstances involving these users, I'd suggest simply ignoring their responses if they're making you upset.
The only 'destruction' these users are capable of causing would be in terms of social psychology. |
|
|
Yes, female individuals regularly rely on the innate-attraction and submission of naive male individuals to manipulate social-interaction.
This is evident throughout society. |
|
|
Due to idealism and social cliques.
It is preferable to favor an individual that many of the people within your social-circle like simply because of the fact that the person is more likely to receive acceptance psychologically.
Although you perceive this individual's behavior as typical, many others would appear to perceive such behavior as "highly-selfless."
Of-course, such behavior does not necessarily have to be objectively selfless; the behavior simply needs to satisfy the ideals of the i... |
|
|
"It's confidence, mate. Narcissitic people tend to have a ton of it. And confidence is a quality that a bunch of women like for better or worse."
The "confidence" that you refer to merely creates a psychological-facade. Narcissistic individuals, such as the males that I am referring to, seem to rely heavily on social conformation to compensate for lower intellectual capabilities.
I disagree with the assertion that any display of excessive self-assurance will convince this woman that I truly a... |
|
|
Yes, I do indeed have a "social life."
Although, my preferred method of social interaction is to provoke impulsive users over the Internet for personal pleasure.
It is not worth maintaining "friendship" when you can enjoy the presence of enemies. |
|
|
Ah, very classic philosophical question.
Well, the essential aspect of the premise that "life" itself does not have any sort of systematic purpose. All "grander schemes of things" are fabricated to provide satisfaction to individuals that cannot recognize that the value of their actions is purely subjective and overall, insignificant.
This is actually quite good, because it guarantees that we do not need to live within a specific boundary of behavior. Rather, we can devise our own social-const... |
|