UnsourcedAnon
#183570741Sunday, February 14, 2016 6:35 AM GMT

You have an interesting inquiry. Could you provide further specification to your request?
UnsourcedAnon
#183637773Monday, February 15, 2016 2:41 AM GMT

Certainly. "tables", although data structures, are also a type of data themselves within Lua. Thus, you can index them within another table as you would any other type of data. An example is shown below: Table = {["Tab"]={"Cookies"}}; print(Table.Tab[1]); This would print the string data "Cookies" because "Cookies" is numerically-indexed within the first position of the indexed table.
UnsourcedAnon
#183643384Monday, February 15, 2016 3:56 AM GMT

"NOT disassembler" Ah, you are referring to an assembler then? Mathematical logic is truly spectacular.
UnsourcedAnon
#183643739Monday, February 15, 2016 4:01 AM GMT

You are essentially implementing an entire, disconnected system of anti-exploit utilities. The more crucial question is whether all of this scattered functionality is truly necessary for what you intend to implement. If you are developing a simple RPG-based game, you can mitigate the vast majority of "significant" issues by regulating client-server interaction properly.
UnsourcedAnon
#183644555Monday, February 15, 2016 4:11 AM GMT

"Are we expected to know who that is?" Certainly not. He/She was/is merely an individual within a social clique on an Internet forum. Focus on your own capabilities for greater pleasure.
UnsourcedAnon
#183645887Monday, February 15, 2016 4:29 AM GMT

Alright, perhaps I can provide you with a subjectively "helpful" suggestion. Do not attempt to replicate the sample scripts provided to the extent of perfection. Rather, attempt to focus on the actual usability of the concept being described. You can only accomplish this effectively by revising your problem-solving capabilities. Firstly, in order to solve a problem, you must identify the given problem. This requires analyzing the available data, such as script errors, to compare to known know...
UnsourcedAnon
#183646099Monday, February 15, 2016 4:32 AM GMT

An evident issue is that your script, identified as "Join", is not bound to any sort of event signalling line. As a result, your script will never execute. Consider using the PlayerAdded event, as shown below: "game.Players.PlayerAdded:connect(Join)" That will execute whenever a Player joins the game.
UnsourcedAnon
#183647006Monday, February 15, 2016 4:44 AM GMT

"No, you're just an idiot" While I admit that his/her attempts to deliberately provoke the above users were rather explicit, it would be somewhat narrow-minded to perceive it solely as due to idiocy. Perhaps they were merely very naive/gullible? After-all, the Internet is a very uncertain medium for connection.
UnsourcedAnon
#183647399Monday, February 15, 2016 4:50 AM GMT

"You're also an idiot for trying to argue" With all due respect, I believe that the term "moron" would be more preferable for an intellectually-inferior and otherwise worthless individual such as myself. "Idiot" is much too lenient. Anyway, returning to the actual discussion, I am very glad that we are having an exchange of opposing opinions. It truly establishes a sort of long-term "social expectation" between us, cntkillme.
UnsourcedAnon
#183650609Monday, February 15, 2016 5:40 AM GMT

Yes, certainly. Although narcissists misuse the anonymity provided by the Internet to "validate" their idiotic assumptions.
UnsourcedAnon
#183650778Monday, February 15, 2016 5:43 AM GMT

Yes. You should click on any link you desire. Windows has special filters that blocks every kind of malware from infecting your computer.
UnsourcedAnon
#183651028Monday, February 15, 2016 5:47 AM GMT

"it's hidden very well" No, if this individual's "insecurities" were "well hidden", he/she would not have created a thread to inquire about the public's opinion of his/her behavior. The overall opinion of the users on this website is quite worthless and idiotic. They are nothing more than narcissistic adolescent schoolchildren.
UnsourcedAnon
#183651122Monday, February 15, 2016 5:49 AM GMT

Very good for you then. Would you like a warm meal to compliment your "kitchen quality" water?
UnsourcedAnon
#183651360Monday, February 15, 2016 5:54 AM GMT

Why do you continue to boast about your "transition" instead of using Lua to create scripting tutorials for the ROBLOX community?
UnsourcedAnon
#183651500Monday, February 15, 2016 5:56 AM GMT

No. "Laws" are merely a psychological-construct. Exhibit as much violence as you please. It is natural for humans to seek pleasure only for themselves.
UnsourcedAnon
#183655404Monday, February 15, 2016 7:32 AM GMT

Correction: Off-Topic is inferior to the Scripters sub-section.
UnsourcedAnon
#183655624Monday, February 15, 2016 7:38 AM GMT

"what if this acc isn't mine and got it from a phishing site" I would imagine that such a confession would trigger moderator penalties.
UnsourcedAnon
#183658908Monday, February 15, 2016 9:39 AM GMT

Surely you have heard of the term "collective noun", yes?
UnsourcedAnon
#183658970Monday, February 15, 2016 9:42 AM GMT

Perhaps it was "Solar Conquest" or "Keith's Shipyards"?
UnsourcedAnon
#183659139Monday, February 15, 2016 9:50 AM GMT

Lua is inferior to Perl.
UnsourcedAnon
#183697642Monday, February 15, 2016 8:57 PM GMT

Very interesting. None of the previous users mentioned the presence of games such as "Solar Conquest" or "Ultimate Build." Nor the various free-model "Nuke" scripts available. I presume that the "Build To Survive" paradigm has already been referenced.
UnsourcedAnon
#183697770Monday, February 15, 2016 8:58 PM GMT

'None of the previous users mentioned the presence of games such as "Solar Conquest" or "Ultimate Build." Nor the various free-model "Nuke" scripts available' I admit being partially-defeated. Only Ultimate Build was referenced.
UnsourcedAnon
#183698427Monday, February 15, 2016 9:06 PM GMT

Your comparison is truly invalid. It consists of nothing more than optimistic, nostalgic illusions.
UnsourcedAnon
#183698626Monday, February 15, 2016 9:09 PM GMT

Online-dating is an action. Otherwise, it would not use the suffix "ing." You cannot be 100% certain that an individual is truly online-dating until you have obtained direct and valid evidence to indicate so. Until then, your statements are tantamount to heavily-biased assumptions.
UnsourcedAnon
#183743757Tuesday, February 16, 2016 7:08 AM GMT

"I'm interested to see what you guys think looks good while retaining maintainability" Well, despite the obvious subjectivity, I can provide you with biased "advice." Firstly, regarding the creation of identifiers, have you considered using a capitalization/underscore combination? A convention that I enjoy using is to separate each shortened word within a variable's name with an underscore character. Afterwards, the first letter of each word is capitalized accordingly. Single word identifiers...