SasookJoin Date: 2009-03-07
Post Count: 41122 |
12-0 is the final score. The final straw was SN perma banning several of my Commandos, SN crashing our raids for no reason, and the poor attitudes of SN. If you need proof of the wins just PM me I took pictures proving it was official before we raided and of our wins.
Good game SN. Get better. |
|
hiuokokJoin Date: 2012-06-16
Post Count: 657 |
sir did i do good |
|
SasookJoin Date: 2009-03-07
Post Count: 41122 |
yes |
|
ArchteryxJoin Date: 2013-02-18
Post Count: 20108 |
Ok
I'm so sorry, it's like every time I see a noob, they have like a bajillion numbers at the end. I think you're an exception. |
|
Legion1xJoin Date: 2012-04-22
Post Count: 4326 |
@sasuke
thought i'd show you this lol.
/dEnsxTT |
|
|
Heil Synoa! Heil RAA!
Take the cow, it's our only hope! |
|
|
CPA AUTOWIN11111111111
"One does not simply beat the floodcheck." |
|
Altair55Join Date: 2008-05-28
Post Count: 38160 |
sasuke i was banned too |
|
|
|
SN does not accept the surrender |
|
SLPMJoin Date: 2010-04-02
Post Count: 33349 |
Hm. I didn't realize you could count raid wins even if you broke fort rules by starting raids before enough SN arrived and other rules similar. Hm.... I guess I will look into that.
Majority of RAA raids were falsified, but if RAA is surrendering, it's fine by me. We will just put you on our defeated list and continue fighting honorable groups like RB. |
|
SLPMJoin Date: 2010-04-02
Post Count: 33349 |
And perhaps if your people stopped breaking our rules they wouldn't be banned. Think a little sasuke. |
|
Altair55Join Date: 2008-05-28
Post Count: 38160 |
how are we surrendering? we literally can't raid you because you banned a lot of RAA's best fighters a lot of which are also in CL. you can't handicap a group while losing 12 - 0 and think it's okay.
also, why would anyone surrender when they're winning 12 - 0? |
|
SasookJoin Date: 2009-03-07
Post Count: 41122 |
Short shutup |
|
|
hiuokokJoin Date: 2012-06-16
Post Count: 657 |
"Majority of RAA raids were falsified, but if RAA is surrendering, it's fine by me. We will just put you on our defeated list and continue fighting honorable groups like RB."
http://i
mgur.c
om/3si
JEQ5
http://im
gur.com
/xLPkR8
Q
|
|
HandsDownJoin Date: 2010-09-09
Post Count: 4034 |
RAA is not surrendering. xD
This is a victory declaration.
Not a surrender. |
|
Theta0Join Date: 2011-02-09
Post Count: 40750 |
SN is bad
Show me your raid wins then |
|
|
short how werent they official |
|
GrognikJoin Date: 2012-08-04
Post Count: 205 |
hail! |
|
|
@Short Agreed
@Sas when ever I get to one of the server's and there have been no HR's there only LR/MR's I see 1. you already have the flag 2.Sk'ing 3.You call AA for :h or :m.
Shadow Nation General Darkhydragin100 |
|
SLPMJoin Date: 2010-04-02
Post Count: 33349 |
@hiu, The first one does not prove that RAA waited for SN to have proper amounts of people. For all we know it was just RAA in that server.
The second one doesn't show a victory.
@shadow, For over half of RAA's "victories" RAA raided when we had less then 5 people, filling the server so that no one else can get in. rules clearly state that we need at least 5 people in server. Also, in many raids RAA repeatedly would break our fort rules such as excessive flaming.
@thea96, Show me yours.
@ HandsDown, Where's the evidence backing up those "raid wins". This is a surrender thread.
@sasuke, Don't tell me to shut up just because I'm right.
@ Altair55, Perhaps they shouldn't break our fort rules then. |
|
SasookJoin Date: 2009-03-07
Post Count: 41122 |
actually I took the liberty of taking pictures before all of our raids began to show there were 5 SN
so actually our raids were all official |
|
Theta0Join Date: 2011-02-09
Post Count: 40750 |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>@thea96, Show me yours.
not in RAA |
|
SLPMJoin Date: 2010-04-02
Post Count: 33349 |
@sasuke, Then show them. |
|